SPAM again?! [xdfsnwu@lycos.com: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia]

SPAM again?! [xdfsnwu@lycos.com: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia]

[Oliver Bandel]

Hi,

this SPAM was NOT blocked.

Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem?

There is not so much SPAM as some weeks ago,
but it seems, that this could be the beginning
of the next flood of spam?

If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that
hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to
delete 60 mails per day by hand?


Ciao,
   Oliver

----- Forwarded message from  Guzman <xdfsnwu@lycos.com> -----

X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
From: " Guzman" <xdfsnwu@lycos.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Cc: caml@inria.fr, camllight@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia
Reply-To: " Guzman" <xdfsnwu@lycos.com>
X-Spam: no; 0.01; raven:99 hale:01 reckon:01 abidjan:99 cigar:99 forsake:01 nebraska:99 elevate:99 butch:99 delimit:01 gamma:01 americana:99 egan:01 benton:01 clockwise:01 
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.38

fife burglar chutney carlyle lieutenant 
dade raven cortege hale ante 
hun inclusive flak prorogue carrion manville plus hi lawman alchemy 

----- End forwarded message -----

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: SPAM again?! [xdfsnwu@lycos.com: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia]

[Remi Vanicat]

oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) writes:

> Hi,
>
> this SPAM was NOT blocked.
>
> Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem?

Well, one of them pass my filter too, these are cleverly done SPAM to
pass through spam filter. 

> If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that
> hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to
> delete 60 mails per day by hand?

Well, ocaml could filter machine listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
And the spam filter might be improved, or might learn (I don't know
what kind of filter the caml-list use.)

[...]


-- 
Rémi Vanicat

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

Re: SPAM again?! [xdfsnwu@lycos.com: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia]

[Sven Luther]

On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:51:40PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > this SPAM was NOT blocked.
> >
> > Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem?
> 
> Well, one of them pass my filter too, these are cleverly done SPAM to
> pass through spam filter. 
> 
> > If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that
> > hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to
> > delete 60 mails per day by hand?
> 
> Well, ocaml could filter machine listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com
> And the spam filter might be improved, or might learn (I don't know
> what kind of filter the caml-list use.)

Spamoracle probably, which cannot cope with those anti-bayesian filter
spams :/

Friendly,

Sven Luther

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

[Caml-list] Re: SPAM again?

[Byron Hale]

You lucky guy. Only 60 s-p-a-m-s a day. I'm getting
as many as 1000. Unfortunately, our domain name
located on what seems to be an "open relay." Our
ISP says they can do something about it and I am
now pursuing that.

After proving his famous incompleteness theorems,
Kurt Godel proved a result that implies that s-p-a-m
filters cannot be 100% effective. :(

I had hoped to set up the domain to run Caml & Haskell
based software, but that's not allowed. So, we're just stuck
until I can figure a better solution that is not a lot more
expensive.

I won't be able to read any replies until my ISP fixes that
email that won't download. Oh, yes...  I moved my office in
December and everything is still in chaos. That slows things
down a bit too. :)

Best Regards,

Byron Hale

At 02:56 AM 1/18/2004, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>this SPAM was NOT blocked.
>
>Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem?
>
>There is not so much SPAM as some weeks ago,
>but it seems, that this could be the beginning
>of the next flood of spam?
>
>If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that
>hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to
>delete 60 mails per day by hand?
>
>Ciao,
>    Oliver
>
>----- Forwarded message from  Guzman <xdfsnwu@lycos.com> -----
(not forwarded) 


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners