From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: new Mail-Followup-To patch...please take a look...
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 00:27:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ktgbtxm.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d73evv3k.fsf@hal.Olympus.INVALID> ("Davide G. M. Salvetti"'s message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 00:40:15 +0200")
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <salve@debian.org> writes:
> Ok for '(lambda). But what's the point in writing #'(lambda ...) if
> (lambda ...) already evaluates to it (being lambda a macro)? Is that
> some kind of stylistic convention, or there is really something more?
There's certainly a difference between ' and #': If you quote an
expression using ', it is not byte compiled, but if you use #', it is.
There's a section in the Elisp manual ('Anonymous Functions') which
explains the difference in more detail.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-27 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-23 15:24 Josh Huber
2001-10-23 15:42 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-23 16:32 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-23 16:54 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-23 17:45 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-23 18:54 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-23 19:53 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 0:34 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-24 11:35 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-24 12:48 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-24 16:31 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 17:08 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-24 17:18 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-26 6:24 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-27 23:23 ` Florian Weimer
2001-10-23 16:56 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-23 17:32 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-23 23:53 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-23 22:40 ` Davide G. M. Salvetti
2001-10-24 1:40 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 12:45 ` Davide G. M. Salvetti
2001-10-24 13:44 ` Samuel Padgett
2001-10-24 15:23 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 15:42 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-24 15:51 ` Samuel Padgett
2001-10-26 6:28 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-27 1:19 ` Barry Fishman
2001-10-29 14:49 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-27 22:27 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-10-24 1:59 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-24 15:02 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-24 16:48 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 17:13 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-25 1:52 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-24 16:13 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 17:19 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-24 17:28 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-24 17:38 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-25 1:45 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-25 18:48 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-29 21:58 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-29 22:19 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-29 22:31 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-30 2:47 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-30 3:11 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-30 3:49 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-30 12:55 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-30 15:31 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-31 13:44 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-10-31 17:28 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-31 17:51 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-31 18:22 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-10-26 6:34 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-26 9:07 ` Per Abrahamsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ktgbtxm.fsf@deneb.enyo.de \
--to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).