From: dick <dick.r.chiang@gmail.com>
To: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
Cc: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>, ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: feature request: differentiate between read and automatically marked read
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:04:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r18k85kj.fsf@dick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmo4m86n.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:38:04 +0100")
> Adaptive scoring is not a bag-of-words approach.
It is, you just don't know it yet. The default is bag-of-lines, but
setting `gnus-use-adaptive-scoring` to `(word)` is bag-of-words. In
either case, it's semantic-free tallying.
Far be it for me to instruct others on what works for them. Just
noting my surprise to the community.
I know of no companies, Google-scale or otherwise, who have stood behind
an algo that opines about the read-worthiness of one's mail unless the
mail is 99.98% probable spam.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-03 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 8:50 Eric S Fraga
2022-02-03 9:10 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-02-03 12:26 ` dick
2022-02-03 12:38 ` Tassilo Horn
2022-02-03 13:04 ` dick [this message]
2022-02-03 13:34 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-02-03 12:50 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-02-05 8:51 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-02-05 9:29 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-02-05 10:36 ` Uwe Brauer
2022-02-07 12:28 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r18k85kj.fsf@dick \
--to=dick.r.chiang@gmail.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=tsdh@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).