From: Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>
Subject: Re: Generating Mail-Followup-To: headers
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 11:51:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rjr8ryd4gg.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vafwv1ro6vg.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:51:47 +0200")
Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> What's so bad about using group parameters for this?
When I have been talking about group parameters, I have always been
imagining sending the mail from inside some folder (or with C-u a from
the *Groups* buffer), and looking at the group parameters for the
current group. In that case it is not robust, since you may send
messages from outside folders, or from other folders than the one
associated with the list.
However, if we are talking about code that iterate through all the
groups and note the (to-list / to-address), and compare that list with
the to/cc in order to decide whether to generate mft header, that is
an entirely different and much cooler case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-20 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-18 5:11 Matt Armstrong
2001-10-18 5:43 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-18 16:08 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-18 16:19 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-18 16:41 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-18 18:17 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-18 23:19 ` Maciej Matysiak
2001-10-19 9:03 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-11-01 21:54 ` Maciej Matysiak
2001-11-01 22:10 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-02 1:03 ` Samuel Padgett
2001-11-07 13:39 ` Maciej Matysiak
2001-11-07 13:30 ` Maciej Matysiak
2001-11-07 14:26 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-11-07 14:31 ` Didier Verna
2001-11-07 14:40 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-11-07 14:44 ` Josh Huber
2001-11-07 15:36 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-11-07 16:08 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-07 17:03 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-11-07 19:59 ` Josh Huber
2001-11-02 8:31 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-11-02 16:09 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-02 16:52 ` OT: make bbdb shut up about different email addresses? Josh Huber
2001-11-02 17:37 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-02 17:48 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-02 19:44 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-02 19:58 ` Paul Jarc
2001-11-02 18:35 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-02 22:27 ` Jack Twilley
2001-11-02 23:54 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-03 5:16 ` thoughts on spam Bill White
2001-11-03 6:33 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-03 7:29 ` SPAM? What SPAM? (was: thoughts on spam) Robin S. Socha
2001-11-03 18:13 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-03 18:39 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-03 19:04 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2001-11-03 19:12 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-03 19:21 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-03 22:52 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2001-11-03 14:48 ` thoughts on spam Bill White
2001-11-03 15:12 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-03 18:24 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-04 6:01 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-04 7:00 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-04 8:40 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 20:04 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-05 20:38 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 23:06 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-06 1:52 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-06 2:07 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-06 2:43 ` Paul Jarc
2001-11-06 3:05 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-06 3:26 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 22:01 ` Chris Shenton
2001-11-05 22:54 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-03 18:26 ` Robin S. Socha
2001-11-03 18:42 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-03 18:56 ` Fabien Penso
2001-11-03 19:24 ` Robin S. Socha
2001-11-04 5:54 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-04 7:07 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-04 9:04 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-04 17:57 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-04 20:46 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 3:49 ` Paul Jarc
2001-11-05 4:34 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 5:27 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-05 15:59 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-05 16:57 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 17:45 ` [OT] " Fabien Penso
2001-11-05 19:25 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 19:33 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-05 19:58 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-05 20:01 ` Karl Kleinpaste
2001-11-05 20:35 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-06 6:51 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-06 16:55 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-06 18:51 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-06 19:19 ` Lost Mail (was thoughts on spam) Stainless Steel Rat
2001-11-06 20:02 ` thoughts on spam Matt Armstrong
2001-11-06 20:49 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-06 19:52 ` Steinar Bang
2001-11-04 17:33 ` François Pinard
2001-11-04 17:23 ` François Pinard
2001-11-03 20:32 ` Russ Allbery
2001-11-03 18:15 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-04 4:08 ` Bill White
2001-11-04 4:04 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-04 4:07 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-04 7:11 ` Bill White
2001-11-04 7:10 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2001-11-04 13:47 ` Harry Putnam
2001-11-04 17:45 ` bbdb arcana Bill White
2001-11-07 13:43 ` Generating Mail-Followup-To: headers Maciej Matysiak
2001-10-19 4:48 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-19 13:46 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 14:08 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-19 15:49 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 15:29 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-19 16:19 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 19:29 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-19 19:44 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 20:59 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-19 15:42 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 16:16 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-19 16:25 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 17:01 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 17:04 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 19:46 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 19:54 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 20:05 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 20:50 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-19 21:12 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-20 6:52 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-20 9:41 ` Per Abrahamsen
2001-10-21 0:58 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-19 20:16 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 21:12 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 21:40 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-20 6:25 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 17:51 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-19 18:23 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 20:31 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-19 20:53 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 22:28 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-19 23:58 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-20 10:56 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-20 11:19 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-10-20 4:47 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-20 10:57 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-20 6:29 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-19 19:26 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-19 21:08 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-19 21:20 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-20 9:51 ` Per Abrahamsen [this message]
2001-10-20 10:59 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-19 16:31 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-10-18 16:59 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-18 16:36 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-18 17:11 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-18 17:56 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-18 18:52 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-18 19:11 ` Josh Huber
2001-10-18 19:29 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-10-18 19:27 ` Paul Jarc
2001-10-19 9:05 ` Kai Großjohann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rjr8ryd4gg.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk \
--to=abraham@dina.kvl.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).