Discussion of Homotopy Type Theory and Univalent Foundations
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrik Buchholtz <ulrikbuchholtz@gmail.com>
To: Homotopy Type Theory <HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [HoTT] Re: Precategories, Categories and Univalent categories
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 06:28:46 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ae4c745-a00e-4ebd-9de2-e29474b75d48@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAkwb-kYvCQpnQSZDWULNW=qTNn-mASKQA7G5iucM6KXFnOjjA@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2243 bytes --]

On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 3:05:44 PM UTC+1, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine 
wrote:
>
> Yep, I indeed meant “agnostic” MLTT — in particular, without univalence 
> (or roughly-equivalent things like the glue-types of cubical type theory).  
> There are lots of motivations for working over that as far as possible: 
> baking univalence into material where it’s not really required feels like 
> when classical mathematicians make use of AC for no real advantage.
>

I'm in some respects sympathetic to this. We just have to be aware that 
working in agnostic type theory leaves us with a burden of 
mentally/manually handling the relevant notions of identity because the 
identity types cannot be relied upon.

But do you really think they don’t consider FinSet_N to be a category??  I 
>> find that very hard to believe: I am pretty sure that most traditional 
>> category theorists would consider FinSet_N a category without any doubt at 
>> all, which really seems to imply that the standard concept of category is 
>> more like “precategory” than “univalent category”.
>>
>
Well, FinSet_N presents FinSet and we often elide the difference between an 
object and a presentation for it, but we do so at our own peril. 
Traditionally, all categories are presented by a strict category, but 
traditional category theorists context-switch easily between strict and 
univalent categories (using heuristics about “evil”–there we go with the 
preaching again, sorry!).

I'm beginning to despair for ever using the word “category” again without a 
modifier. The notion of “precategory” is pretty weird in the standard 
model: Why should the notion of an infinity-groupoid with a family of 
hom-sets be the sanctified notion?! Of course it turns out to be a useful 
notion, just like group presentations are useful. But group theory is about 
groups, not group presentations.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Homotopy Type Theory" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to HomotopyTypeTheory+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3210 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-07 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-07 10:03 [HoTT] " Ali Caglayan
2018-11-07 10:31 ` [HoTT] " Paolo Capriotti
2018-11-07 10:35 ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2018-11-07 10:37   ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2018-11-07 11:09   ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2018-11-07 11:43     ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2018-11-07 11:50       ` Erik Palmgren
2018-11-07 11:51       ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2018-11-07 12:03         ` Erik Palmgren
2018-11-07 12:21           ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-11-07 13:00             ` Erik Palmgren
2018-11-07 13:02             ` Bas Spitters
2018-11-07 13:47               ` Ali Caglayan
2018-11-07 13:53               ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-07 14:05                 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-07 13:58       ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-07 14:14         ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2018-11-07 14:27           ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
     [not found]             ` <CAOvivQyG1q9=3YoS8hX3bRQK0yi+mpBnJu+rqb3oon0uPLpZ4A@mail.gmail.com>
2018-11-07 20:01               ` Michael Shulman
2018-11-08 21:37               ` Martín Hötzel Escardó
2018-11-08 21:43                 ` Michael Shulman
2018-11-09  4:43                   ` Andrew Polonsky
2018-11-09 10:18                     ` Ulrik Buchholtz
2018-11-09 10:57                       ` Paolo Capriotti
2018-11-07 14:31           ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-07 14:05       ` Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine
2018-11-07 14:28         ` Ulrik Buchholtz [this message]
2018-11-07 15:35           ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-07 16:54             ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-07 16:56               ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-07 17:31                 ` Eric Finster
2018-11-08 11:58               ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-08 12:23                 ` [HoTT] " Emily Riehl
2018-11-08 12:28                   ` Emily Riehl
2018-11-08 14:01                     ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-08 16:10                   ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-08 14:38                 ` [HoTT] " Michael Shulman
2018-11-08 21:08                   ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-08 21:30                     ` Michael Shulman
2018-11-09 11:56                       ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-09 13:46                         ` Michael Shulman
2018-11-09 15:06                           ` Thomas Streicher
2018-11-08 16:01                 ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-08 19:39                   ` Thorsten Altenkirch
2018-11-07 20:00         ` Michael Shulman
2018-11-08 21:35 ` Martín Hötzel Escardó

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ae4c745-a00e-4ebd-9de2-e29474b75d48@googlegroups.com \
    --to=ulrikbuchholtz@gmail.com \
    --cc=HomotopyTypeTheory@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).