From: Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
Subject: Re: [TUHS] CMU Mach sources?
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:44:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626174431.GT925@mcvoy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626151143.GC3116@mit.edu>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:11:43AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Unfortunately, I have to disagree with Larry, there are many, many
> engineers who works because they get a paycheck, and so they go home
> at 5pm. Some people might be free to improve their code on their own
> time, or late at night, but corporation also preach "work/life
> balance" --- and then don't fund time for making code long-term
> maintainable or reducing tech debt.
Yeah, I was talking about 25-30 years ago. And even then there were
people who were there for the paycheck. But the people I considered
my peers were people who cared deeply about doing work well. The
motivation was that we were at Sun, everyone wanted a Sun workstation,
which made it all the more important that we did stuff right.
If you need any proof, look no further than me. I was the guy who was
so happy to be at Sun, I walked around for 3 years saying "I'd do this
job for free if I had enough money" :)
I think that feeling still exists but it is much harder to find these
days, systems work seems to have dried up, kids think a server is a
VM, it's a strange world.
> There is a similar related issue around publishing papers to document
> great ideas. This takes time away from product development, and it
> used to be that Sun was really prolific at documenting their technical
> innovations at conferences like Usenix. Over time, the academic
> traditions started dying off, and managers who came from that
> tradition moved on, retired, or got promoted beyond the point where
> they could encourage engineers to do that work. And it wasn't just at
> Sun; I was working at IBM when IBM decided to take away the (de
> minimus) bonus for publishing papers at conferences.
Huh, I didn't know IBM gave bonuses for papers, Sun never did. I don't
remember, but they may have paid for us to go to a conference.
> But at the
> Usenix board, I remember looking at a chart of the declining number of
> ATC papers coming from industry over time. And it was very depressing...
Tell me about it. Systems work just isn't what it once was.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-23 4:38 Chris Hanson
2019-06-23 5:15 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-23 8:52 ` Andrew Warkentin
2019-06-23 13:39 ` Jon Forrest
2019-06-23 13:59 ` arnold
2019-06-23 14:03 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-23 8:04 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-23 14:54 ` Henry Bent
2019-06-23 21:52 ` Clem Cole
2019-06-25 0:06 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-25 0:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-06-25 0:45 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-25 0:55 ` Kurt H Maier
2019-06-25 4:18 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 23:19 ` [TUHS] Craft vs Research (Re: " Bakul Shah
2019-06-27 0:16 ` tuhs
2019-06-27 17:06 ` Clem Cole
2019-06-25 1:00 ` [TUHS] " Richard Salz
2019-06-25 8:00 ` Kevin Bowling
2019-06-25 12:11 ` Arthur Krewat
2019-06-25 12:17 ` Arthur Krewat
2019-06-26 2:45 ` Kurt H Maier
2019-06-26 2:56 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 15:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-06-26 17:44 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2019-06-26 18:01 ` arnold
2019-06-26 18:18 ` Warner Losh
2019-06-26 19:22 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-26 19:32 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-06-26 20:21 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-27 0:22 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-27 1:02 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-27 1:26 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-27 4:01 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2019-06-27 10:34 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-06-27 10:59 ` arnold
2019-06-27 11:13 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-06-27 11:39 ` arnold
2019-06-27 14:58 ` Warner Losh
2019-06-27 17:25 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 19:30 ` Dennis Boone
2019-06-26 19:25 ` Adam Thornton
2019-06-23 8:27 ` Kevin Bowling
2019-06-25 3:07 ` Gregg Levine
2019-06-25 8:15 ` Kevin Bowling
2019-06-25 18:18 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-25 20:23 ` Gregg Levine
2019-06-26 1:04 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-26 0:53 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-25 7:49 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-25 7:59 ` Andreas Grapentin
2019-06-23 22:08 Noel Chiappa
2019-06-23 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-06-24 17:04 ` Jason Stevens
2019-07-01 13:20 Jason Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626174431.GT925@mcvoy.com \
--to=lm@mcvoy.com \
--cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).