From: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>
To: Richard Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] CMU Mach sources?
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 01:00:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7dMtCX6-_e4ZCud-zTSmByBEqA-h23sRYuPPBcLRDfpxFA2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFH29trvYzXk5Uq3ndeaEOTTs3ChXH3ECJp_vo2u3RCemhCBbg@mail.gmail.com>
Why not? The utility of history isn't just recording or paying
reverence for the past, we can also draw conclusions in the current or
insights into the future -- "the old new thing"
That's certainly why I'm here and invest in computer history. Of
course it can be lossy, and victors get more air time. But there's
nothing inherently wrong with strong opinions or criticism of the
past.
Regards,
Kevin
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:01 PM Richard Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is this really the kind of commentary appropriate for this list? I mean I'm new here, but...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-23 4:38 Chris Hanson
2019-06-23 5:15 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-23 8:52 ` Andrew Warkentin
2019-06-23 13:39 ` Jon Forrest
2019-06-23 13:59 ` arnold
2019-06-23 14:03 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-23 8:04 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-23 14:54 ` Henry Bent
2019-06-23 21:52 ` Clem Cole
2019-06-25 0:06 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-25 0:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-06-25 0:45 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-25 0:55 ` Kurt H Maier
2019-06-25 4:18 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 23:19 ` [TUHS] Craft vs Research (Re: " Bakul Shah
2019-06-27 0:16 ` tuhs
2019-06-27 17:06 ` Clem Cole
2019-06-25 1:00 ` [TUHS] " Richard Salz
2019-06-25 8:00 ` Kevin Bowling [this message]
2019-06-25 12:11 ` Arthur Krewat
2019-06-25 12:17 ` Arthur Krewat
2019-06-26 2:45 ` Kurt H Maier
2019-06-26 2:56 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 15:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-06-26 17:44 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 18:01 ` arnold
2019-06-26 18:18 ` Warner Losh
2019-06-26 19:22 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-26 19:32 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-06-26 20:21 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-27 0:22 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-27 1:02 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-27 1:26 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-27 4:01 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2019-06-27 10:34 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-06-27 10:59 ` arnold
2019-06-27 11:13 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-06-27 11:39 ` arnold
2019-06-27 14:58 ` Warner Losh
2019-06-27 17:25 ` Larry McVoy
2019-06-26 19:30 ` Dennis Boone
2019-06-26 19:25 ` Adam Thornton
2019-06-23 8:27 ` Kevin Bowling
2019-06-25 3:07 ` Gregg Levine
2019-06-25 8:15 ` Kevin Bowling
2019-06-25 18:18 ` Chris Hanson
2019-06-25 20:23 ` Gregg Levine
2019-06-26 1:04 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-26 0:53 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-25 7:49 ` Jason Stevens
2019-06-25 7:59 ` Andreas Grapentin
2019-06-23 22:08 Noel Chiappa
2019-06-23 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2019-06-24 17:04 ` Jason Stevens
2019-07-01 13:20 Jason Stevens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK7dMtCX6-_e4ZCud-zTSmByBEqA-h23sRYuPPBcLRDfpxFA2w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kevin.bowling@kev009.com \
--cc=rich.salz@gmail.com \
--cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).