From: Ed Carp <erc@pobox.com>
To: Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com>
Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org, Doug McIlroy <doug@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2019 08:01:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACYmRNCfKqSoUFsjA=rD9KsfGVfXrU-5Kmibo9Y0ewuGZErLsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABH=_VQ+2T1EBE2ysvLP-4ODighbUv-Wnf5M-_2Tv+6SQiyGxg@mail.gmail.com>
> All that being said, I don't think this argument applies in any way to
> Bell Labs and Unix. Unix was "applied usefully" long before Stallman
> and Torvalds came along. Not crediting its inventors is inexcusable.
Completely agree!
On 1/5/19, Paul Winalski <paul.winalski@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/4/19, Doug McIlroy <doug@cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>>
>> In the case of Steve Jobs, Isaacson tells not just that the Alto system
>> from Xerox inspired him, but also who its star creators were: Lampson,
>> Thacker and Kay. But then he stomps on them: "Once again, the greatest
>> innovation would come not from the people who created the breakthroughs,
>> but from the people who applied them usefully." While he very describes
>> innovation as a continuum from invention through engineering to
>> marketing,
>> he seems to be more impressed by the later stages.
>
> I would argue that Isaacson does have a point here. After Lampson
> left Xerox PARC he set up a similar outfit at Digital'--the Western
> Research Lab (WRL). They did a lot of interesting work in the area of
> software development tools. I was working in the software tools
> engineering group at the time, and we would have loved to take WRL's
> work and to incorporate it in our products. But we couldn't. Why?
> Because they wrote everything in Modula 3, and we were using BLISS.
> It was too expensive and time-consuming to do the translation. If
> they had worked in BLISS, we could have just taken their code and run
> with it. From my perspective it looked as though they were
> deliberately setting up barriers to prevent us from sullying their
> research by actually turning it into useful products.
>
> In one memo to DEC's engineering staff, Gordon Bell proposed a "Xerox
> PARC" award to the R&D project that advanced the state-of-the-art the
> most while simultaneously advancing DEC's bottom line the least.
>
> Yes, PARC invented the modern windows-based GUI, but, as with so many
> PARC innovations, Xerox did nothing with it. Based on how the PARC
> alumni at WRL behaved at DEC,I would argue that this was the fault of
> PARC as much as of Xerox management.
>
> All that being said, I don't think this argument applies in any way to
> Bell Labs and Unix. Unix was "applied usefully" long before Stallman
> and Torvalds came along. Not crediting its inventors is inexcusable.
>
> -Paul W.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-05 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-05 2:26 Doug McIlroy
2019-01-05 2:35 ` Ronald Natalie
2019-01-05 15:31 ` Larry McVoy
2019-01-05 17:01 ` A. P. Garcia
2019-01-05 20:27 ` Paul Winalski
2019-01-05 21:38 ` A. P. Garcia
2019-01-05 21:51 ` Rob Pike
2019-01-05 21:53 ` Rob Pike
2019-01-05 21:52 ` Larry McVoy
2019-01-06 1:50 ` Chris Hanson
2019-01-06 2:18 ` A. P. Garcia
2019-01-05 17:07 ` Donald ODona
2019-01-05 21:20 ` joe mcguckin
2019-01-06 1:43 ` Chris Hanson
2019-01-06 2:40 ` [TUHS] Emacs (was: Isaacson v Unix) Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2019-01-06 6:01 ` Donald ODona
2019-01-06 6:03 ` Larry McVoy
2019-01-06 6:26 ` Chris Hanson
2019-01-06 7:50 ` [TUHS] Emacs Lars Brinkhoff
2019-01-06 14:23 ` Andrew Luke Nesbit
2019-01-06 14:30 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2019-01-05 9:08 ` [TUHS] Isaacson v Unix William Corcoran
2019-01-05 12:09 ` Ed Carp
2019-01-05 14:15 ` Paul Winalski
2019-01-05 15:01 ` Ed Carp [this message]
2019-01-06 4:35 ` Bakul Shah
2019-01-06 4:52 ` Bakul Shah
2019-01-06 5:00 ` Toby Thain
2019-01-05 4:20 Noel Chiappa
2019-01-05 14:30 Noel Chiappa
2019-01-05 15:04 ` Ed Carp
2019-01-05 15:26 ` Warner Losh
2019-01-05 15:37 ` Ben Greenfield via TUHS
2019-01-05 21:34 Doug McIlroy
[not found] <mailman.2.1546724053.30035.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2019-01-06 3:45 ` Paul McJones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACYmRNCfKqSoUFsjA=rD9KsfGVfXrU-5Kmibo9Y0ewuGZErLsw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=erc@pobox.com \
--cc=doug@cs.dartmouth.edu \
--cc=paul.winalski@gmail.com \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).