9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Wearables
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 07:33:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e60705170733o5cbba67dq426140b113e41793@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fd183965e5baa133533b837abfe09c2@csplan9.rit.edu>

On 5/17/07, john@csplan9.rit.edu <john@csplan9.rit.edu> wrote:
> > lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> > But if ever there was a market born to take best advantage of Plan9's long suit,
> > handheld, or 'wearable' has to be the most obvious contender, and on power nd
> > bandwidth consumption as much as CPU cycles or 'local' RAM capacity.
> >
>
> A friend and I are starting a project to create a simple wearable computer. We've
> got some hardware to get started; probably will begin with a laptop, our camera
> viewfinder HMD, and a keyboard strapped around the waist (crude, I know) or
> some form of home-brewed chording device. I considered using Plan 9, but since
> we don't plan to include a pointing device yet, and the viewfinder can only display
> low resolutions and in black and white, I think we'll end up going with something
> designed to be used 80x24 characters at a time... Linux. If somebody can present
> me with some good reasons to use Plan 9 instead, we can try it, but I really
> don't think Plan 9 actually is ideal for a wearable.
>

What are your requirements that disqualify Plan 9?  Or is just a "feeling"?

Coraid puts Plan 9 in their storage products.  It's performing a
useful task, and you don't even need to know it's there.  But it's
still powering the device.

Small and simple can still be beautiful and elegant :-)

> John
>
>


-- 
- Passage Matthew 5:37:
   But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever
is more than these cometh of evil.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-12  8:43 Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad R60e notebook compatible with Plan9?] Vester Thacker
2007-05-12 14:36 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad lucio
2007-05-12 21:56   ` Navin Johnson
2007-05-12 14:38 ` lucio
2007-05-15 17:13 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad R60e notebook compatible with Plan9?] Dave Lukes
2007-05-16  4:10   ` Navin Johnson
2007-05-16  4:41     ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM lucio
2007-05-16  4:46     ` lucio
2007-05-16  7:29     ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-16 12:00     ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad R60e notebook compatible with Plan9?] Robert Sherwood
2007-05-16 13:46       ` W B Hacker
2007-05-16 14:03       ` erik quanstrom
2007-05-16 14:56         ` Robert Sherwood
2007-05-16 17:54       ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM lucio
2007-05-16 18:38         ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-16 18:42           ` lucio
2007-05-16 23:32         ` W B Hacker
2007-05-16 23:51           ` Uriel
2007-05-17  0:13             ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17  4:41           ` lucio
2007-05-17 11:34             ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 18:01               ` lucio
2007-05-17 14:26           ` [9fans] Wearables john
2007-05-17 14:33             ` Gabriel Diaz
2007-05-17 14:33             ` David Leimbach [this message]
2007-05-17 15:20               ` john
2007-05-17 14:58             ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 15:30               ` john
2007-05-17 16:38                 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 15:24             ` ron minnich
2007-05-17 15:33               ` john
2007-05-17 16:00                 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-17 16:14                 ` ron minnich
2007-05-17 16:38                   ` john
2007-05-17 16:45                     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-05-17 16:51                       ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 17:04                     ` Salva Peiró
2007-05-17 17:14                     ` erik quanstrom
2007-05-17 17:18                     ` ron minnich
2007-05-17 19:04                       ` tlaronde
2007-05-17 17:24                     ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-17 18:43                       ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-17 18:07             ` lucio
2007-05-18 16:54         ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM Cranky Old Bat
2007-05-18 18:49           ` lucio
2007-05-18 18:58             ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-05-18 19:32               ` David Leimbach
2007-05-18 19:35                 ` ron minnich
2007-05-18 21:21                   ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-05-21 23:32                   ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-05-18 19:54           ` Markus Sonderegger
2007-05-16 14:45   ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-05-17 14:32     ` Dave Lukes
2007-05-17 18:09       ` lucio
2007-05-18 12:36       ` Gorka Guardiola

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e1162e60705170733o5cbba67dq426140b113e41793@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).