From: W B Hacker <wbh@conducive.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:34:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464C3DC2.9080906@conducive.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b8e695a785420f753d5214cb614da15@proxima.alt.za>
lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>> Think PDA, phone handset, 'thin client' (terminal) and the heavy-hitters for
>> storage and computation located somewhere else on the network.
>
> I do, but what induces the IT manager in a 200+ organisation to think
> Plan 9? And why would I want her to?
>
> ++L
>
>
I'd class that as a de-facto impossibility.
WTH - we couldn't get OS/2 'sold' in an organization ten times that size and
more. Even though it was largely IBM mainframe dominated, and whose senior
management *liked* IBM .... and against, of all things, Win 3.X - despite a more
robust and then still fully compatible Win-OS2 being built in to OS/2. (Win-95
was still years away at the time).
I don't see Plan9 ever even starting down the 'populist' road in that manner.
But the choice of embedded and 'appliance' OS'en is not made the same way, and
the 'Windows' cachet as not as hard to compete with.
Virus host in my cellphone? No thanks!
But cellphones, to name just one - can easily sell half-a-million 'seats' in two
years or fewer - and to folks who could give a Massachusetts as to what brand is
on the underlying OS software.
Those who have WinCE on their 'devices' know it. Those who have 'ABM' often
*don't* know - or care - what they are using. So long as it JFW.
To the extent Plan9 can support a 'bespoke' UI and show life-cycle cost and
performance advantages, STB, hand-held, and other 'appliance' makers can adopt
it without it being directly 'in the face' of the end user.
And by 'bespoke UI' I don't mean folks here porting X-Windows, re-inventing
drawterm or anything of the sort.
Rather, the device-maker's own team putting up something customized - more like
GEM or the iPOD interface - even QNX' 'Photon' approach.
Something that 'JFDI' whatever the device is expected to do.
Not having a heavy and entrenched GUI already in place to 'fight with' is
actually an advantage for Plan9 on that score.
Just do a file-count and 'du' before and after an install of
Xorg+wm+desktop+tools of-choice on any *n*x.
Then weep over the waste of it all. And prepare for version Hell on upgrades.
There has to be a better way.
Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-17 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-12 8:43 Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad R60e notebook compatible with Plan9?] Vester Thacker
2007-05-12 14:36 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad lucio
2007-05-12 21:56 ` Navin Johnson
2007-05-12 14:38 ` lucio
2007-05-15 17:13 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad R60e notebook compatible with Plan9?] Dave Lukes
2007-05-16 4:10 ` Navin Johnson
2007-05-16 4:41 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM lucio
2007-05-16 4:46 ` lucio
2007-05-16 7:29 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-16 12:00 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM ThinkPad R60e notebook compatible with Plan9?] Robert Sherwood
2007-05-16 13:46 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-16 14:03 ` erik quanstrom
2007-05-16 14:56 ` Robert Sherwood
2007-05-16 17:54 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM lucio
2007-05-16 18:38 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-16 18:42 ` lucio
2007-05-16 23:32 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-16 23:51 ` Uriel
2007-05-17 0:13 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 4:41 ` lucio
2007-05-17 11:34 ` W B Hacker [this message]
2007-05-17 18:01 ` lucio
2007-05-17 14:26 ` [9fans] Wearables john
2007-05-17 14:33 ` Gabriel Diaz
2007-05-17 14:33 ` David Leimbach
2007-05-17 15:20 ` john
2007-05-17 14:58 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 15:30 ` john
2007-05-17 16:38 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 15:24 ` ron minnich
2007-05-17 15:33 ` john
2007-05-17 16:00 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-17 16:14 ` ron minnich
2007-05-17 16:38 ` john
2007-05-17 16:45 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-05-17 16:51 ` W B Hacker
2007-05-17 17:04 ` Salva Peiró
2007-05-17 17:14 ` erik quanstrom
2007-05-17 17:18 ` ron minnich
2007-05-17 19:04 ` tlaronde
2007-05-17 17:24 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-17 18:43 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-05-17 18:07 ` lucio
2007-05-18 16:54 ` Warning: Rant. Please disregard. [Was: Re: [9fans] Is IBM Cranky Old Bat
2007-05-18 18:49 ` lucio
2007-05-18 18:58 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2007-05-18 19:32 ` David Leimbach
2007-05-18 19:35 ` ron minnich
2007-05-18 21:21 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-05-21 23:32 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-05-18 19:54 ` Markus Sonderegger
2007-05-16 14:45 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-05-17 14:32 ` Dave Lukes
2007-05-17 18:09 ` lucio
2007-05-18 12:36 ` Gorka Guardiola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464C3DC2.9080906@conducive.org \
--to=wbh@conducive.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).