* [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions.
@ 2011-02-25 8:08 Jason Dreisbach
2011-02-25 14:11 ` Jack Norton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason Dreisbach @ 2011-02-25 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 640 bytes --]
Hi all,
Can anyone help shed some light in my search for a "low power" minimal plan
9 hardware setup to start experimenting with. Has anyone had success running
plan 9 on a Fit PC (the only atom box we have access to)?
Gumstix would be ideal, but their plan 9 support is a bit half baked right
now. Wireless support would be a huge plus.
We are trying to do a bit of research into robotic applications of plan 9.
The p9 filesystem protocol seems like a real neat method to acquire
resources of nearby "bots". Allowing for very minimal, modularized robot
configurations.
Any tips? Am I out of my mind?
Thanks,
Jason
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 794 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions.
2011-02-25 8:08 [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions Jason Dreisbach
@ 2011-02-25 14:11 ` Jack Norton
2011-02-25 14:23 ` Jacob Todd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jack Norton @ 2011-02-25 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Jason Dreisbach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone help shed some light in my search for a "low power" minimal
> plan 9 hardware setup to start experimenting with. Has anyone had
> success running plan 9 on a Fit PC (the only atom box we have access to)?
>
> Gumstix would be ideal, but their plan 9 support is a bit half baked
> right now. Wireless support would be a huge plus.
>
> We are trying to do a bit of research into robotic applications of plan
> 9. The p9 filesystem protocol seems like a real neat method to acquire
> resources of nearby "bots". Allowing for very minimal, modularized robot
> configurations.
>
> Any tips? Am I out of my mind?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
Jason,
I am currently attempting a little ROV using some 9p for control, but I
am using inferno hosted on linux. That might be the quicker way to get
your 'bots speaking 9p. I am doing this because right off the bat I
need a webcam. I also need to prototype this very quickly so mucking
about in hardware drivers and OS nuances is not an option.
Sounds like fun! I'm curious what you come up with!
-Jack
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions.
2011-02-25 14:11 ` Jack Norton
@ 2011-02-25 14:23 ` Jacob Todd
2011-02-25 15:16 ` ron minnich
2011-02-25 15:45 ` Jack Norton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Todd @ 2011-02-25 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1330 bytes --]
Does inferno have support for (a) webcam(s)? Or are you using linux for
capturing things from the webcam?
On Feb 25, 2011 9:14 AM, "Jack Norton" <jack@0x6a.com> wrote:
> Jason Dreisbach wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can anyone help shed some light in my search for a "low power" minimal
>> plan 9 hardware setup to start experimenting with. Has anyone had
>> success running plan 9 on a Fit PC (the only atom box we have access to)?
>>
>> Gumstix would be ideal, but their plan 9 support is a bit half baked
>> right now. Wireless support would be a huge plus.
>>
>> We are trying to do a bit of research into robotic applications of plan
>> 9. The p9 filesystem protocol seems like a real neat method to acquire
>> resources of nearby "bots". Allowing for very minimal, modularized robot
>> configurations.
>>
>> Any tips? Am I out of my mind?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>
> Jason,
>
> I am currently attempting a little ROV using some 9p for control, but I
> am using inferno hosted on linux. That might be the quicker way to get
> your 'bots speaking 9p. I am doing this because right off the bat I
> need a webcam. I also need to prototype this very quickly so mucking
> about in hardware drivers and OS nuances is not an option.
> Sounds like fun! I'm curious what you come up with!
>
> -Jack
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1722 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions.
2011-02-25 14:23 ` Jacob Todd
@ 2011-02-25 15:16 ` ron minnich
2011-02-25 15:45 ` Jack Norton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ron minnich @ 2011-02-25 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
wireless support: se lucho's note about his almost-done wifi driver.
That said, you might want wireless usb with the atheros chip (6000
series?) that does most of the wireless stack. Charles knows more.
webcam: is this a usb webcam? USB support is getting better.
low power -- is an atom mobo low enough?
The interno + 9p approach is not a bad idea. In fact, inferno might be
ideal for what you are doing.
ron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions.
2011-02-25 14:23 ` Jacob Todd
2011-02-25 15:16 ` ron minnich
@ 2011-02-25 15:45 ` Jack Norton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jack Norton @ 2011-02-25 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Jacob Todd wrote:
> Does inferno have support for (a) webcam(s)? Or are you using linux for
> capturing things from the webcam?
>
> On Feb 25, 2011 9:14 AM, "Jack Norton" <jack@0x6a.com
> <mailto:jack@0x6a.com>> wrote:
> > Jason Dreisbach wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Can anyone help shed some light in my search for a "low power" minimal
> >> plan 9 hardware setup to start experimenting with. Has anyone had
> >> success running plan 9 on a Fit PC (the only atom box we have access
> to)?
> >>
> >> Gumstix would be ideal, but their plan 9 support is a bit half baked
> >> right now. Wireless support would be a huge plus.
> >>
> >> We are trying to do a bit of research into robotic applications of plan
> >> 9. The p9 filesystem protocol seems like a real neat method to acquire
> >> resources of nearby "bots". Allowing for very minimal, modularized
> robot
> >> configurations.
> >>
> >> Any tips? Am I out of my mind?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >
> > Jason,
> >
> > I am currently attempting a little ROV using some 9p for control, but I
> > am using inferno hosted on linux. That might be the quicker way to get
> > your 'bots speaking 9p. I am doing this because right off the bat I
> > need a webcam. I also need to prototype this very quickly so mucking
> > about in hardware drivers and OS nuances is not an option.
> > Sounds like fun! I'm curious what you come up with!
> >
> > -Jack
> >
It's a USB webcam (logitech POS is the model I believe :) ). Right now
I am leaving the webcam for last, so right now linux is providing the
drivers and I am watching it 'quick and dirty' with a seperate xawtv
window. The webcam is my last step because it really is just outside
the reach of my personal programing capabilities (I'm a physicist -- god
help you if I ever have to write code for you...). In all reality I may
get as far as an ugly hack involving some host multimedia converters and
file2chan, but that is optimistic at best right now.
Once the concept is limping along, I can then really attempt a native
webcam of some sort.
In any event I've got the impression that inferno could be really cool
in a robotics environment, hence the motivation.
-Jack
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-25 15:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-02-25 8:08 [9fans] Small Plan9 box suggestions Jason Dreisbach
2011-02-25 14:11 ` Jack Norton
2011-02-25 14:23 ` Jacob Todd
2011-02-25 15:16 ` ron minnich
2011-02-25 15:45 ` Jack Norton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).