From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb+usenet@becket.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] GUI toolkit for Plan 9
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:18:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87it8izguc.fsf@becket.becket.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020227122932.M26250@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
lucio@proxima.alt.za (Lucio De Re) writes:
> > > However, it seems to be an accepted consequence amongst compiler
> > > writers to trade off possible incorrect code generation against
> > > probable speed gains.
> >
> > I've never heard someone say that, actually. Perhaps you could give a
> > citation from a compiler writer who said "yeah, this generates
> > incorrect code, but hey, it runs fast!"?
>
> That's being intentionally obtuse. Adding code to a computer program
> increases the probability of its being incorrect. Prove me wrong.
Your argument is bogus, then. If *that's* all you mean, then you have
an argument against *ever* adding *any* feature to *anything*, since
you would be getting "probably gains" and earning "possible incorrect
behavior".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-28 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-26 19:05 presotto
2002-02-26 19:47 ` Mike Haertel
2002-02-27 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:29 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 12:21 ` Graham Gallagher
2002-02-27 12:59 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 21:07 ` Graham Gallagher
2002-02-28 9:57 ` ozan s yigit
2002-02-28 10:18 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG [this message]
2002-02-28 16:01 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-28 14:55 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-07 4:37 okamoto
2002-03-06 9:50 Roger Peppe
2002-03-05 17:29 forsyth
2002-03-04 14:33 Russ Cox
2002-03-04 14:02 nigel
2002-03-05 4:16 ` Martin C.Atkins
2002-03-04 14:01 anothy
2002-03-04 13:35 anothy
2002-03-01 17:21 anothy
2002-03-04 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 22:30 bwc
2002-02-28 21:34 dmr
2002-02-28 18:56 David Gordon Hogan
2002-02-28 18:41 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-28 17:19 anothy
2002-03-01 10:03 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 15:22 presotto
2002-02-28 16:35 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-02-28 16:55 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 8:27 ` Martin C.Atkins
2002-03-04 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-04 13:59 ` Martin C.Atkins
2002-02-28 11:03 Bengt Kleberg
2002-02-28 16:41 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 0:54 ` Richard Uhtenwoldt
2002-02-27 14:19 presotto
2002-02-27 10:57 Bengt Kleberg
2002-02-27 11:10 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 10:45 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-27 10:26 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-28 10:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 21:05 forsyth
2002-02-26 20:28 presotto
2002-02-27 6:54 ` Eric Dorman
2002-02-27 10:20 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-27 10:51 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-27 13:27 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-27 14:20 ` Ish Rattan
2002-02-27 22:44 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 4:41 ` Lucio De Re
2002-02-28 10:19 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 10:14 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 10:49 ` Matt H
2002-03-01 13:25 ` chad
2002-02-28 9:57 ` ozan s yigit
2002-02-28 14:55 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-26 20:25 Russ Cox
2002-02-26 18:00 andrey mirtchovski
2002-02-26 14:30 rob pike
2002-02-26 14:25 rob pike
2002-02-26 14:24 rob pike
2002-02-26 17:13 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 17:44 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-27 10:07 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 17:48 ` Quinn Dunkan
2002-02-26 19:40 ` William Josephson
2002-02-26 11:24 geoff
2002-02-25 14:59 andrey mirtchovski
2002-02-25 14:41 rob pike
2002-02-25 17:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-25 14:39 rob pike
2002-02-25 17:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-25 14:34 rob pike
2002-02-25 17:10 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-25 17:25 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-25 17:54 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-26 10:26 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-26 10:27 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-02-25 1:30 okamoto
2002-02-22 13:29 rob pike
2002-02-22 13:43 ` plan9
2002-02-25 10:09 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-22 17:11 ` Dan Cross
2002-02-22 12:42 forsyth
2002-02-22 12:42 forsyth
2002-02-25 10:10 ` phaet0n
2002-02-22 11:30 sape
2002-02-22 9:58 phaet0n
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87it8izguc.fsf@becket.becket.net \
--to=tb+usenet@becket.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).