9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ron minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] porting from vs. porting to Plan 9
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:18:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171611480.12875-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oprw7e2gvxrveh1e@smtp.borf.com>

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Brantley Coile wrote:

> <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> > I'd still rather work with a real plan 9 kernel. There's so much
> > baggage in Linux I don't want to deal with. I would rather put my
> > efforts into making plan 9 a bigger deal.
>
> Can this be done without having to make a branch of the Linux kernel?

I was not doing it as a branch, but as a module. Part of the fun was it
really made me think more about how Plan 9 has to do things -- so it was
educational. I had trivial instances of bind etc. trivially working for
trivial things, but then I was able to stop ...

I only did this when I despaired of seeing the license change. That's been
fixed.

The goal was to at some point remove all the standard Linux system calls.
I had no interest in co-existence.

> The Linux baggage is just the cost of having most hardware supported.
> Can most of the Linux kernel be look--don't touch?

Now that inferno has opened up why not just use inferno on linux?

One thing that would be a step forward would be to have a plan 9 distro
that included all the inferno stuff too. Mainly a packaging thing I guess.
But the plan 9/inferno split seems unnecessary (to me anyway).

The main reactions I see to Plan 9 are
- "I don't get the window manager"
- "Where's emacs"
- "Where's the browser"
- "How do I handle PCMCIA and USB"

I still think the last is the biggest deal. Hot-plug is really needed. It
would be nice to do it somehow better than the zillions of kernel modules
I see in linux:

Module                  Size  Used by    Tainted: PF
eepro100               19824   1
supermon_proc          12416   0
symdm                   1876   0  [supermon_proc]
vmnet                  24704   7
vmmon                  23636   4
prism2_pci             99656   1  (autoclean)
p80211                 25460   1  (autoclean) [prism2_pci]
radeon                 95736   1
agpgart                39168   3
binfmt_misc             6916   1
autofs                 10980   0  (autoclean) (unused)
ds                      8256   2
yenta_socket           11968   2
pcmcia_core            47008   0  [ds yenta_socket]
usb-uhci               24292   0  (unused)
usbcore                68576   1  [usb-uhci]

ron



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-17 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-17 15:20 mirtchov
2003-10-17 16:34 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-10-17 17:08   ` Joel Salomon
2003-10-17 18:55     ` Brantley Coile
2003-10-17 19:05       ` matt
2003-10-17 20:17       ` ron minnich
2003-10-17 20:20         ` Christopher Nielsen
2003-10-17 20:26         ` Brantley Coile
2003-10-17 20:41           ` Charles Forsyth
2003-10-17 20:54             ` Brantley Coile
2003-10-20 10:33             ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-10-20 16:03               ` Skip Tavakkolian
2003-10-21  6:07                 ` Adrian Tritschler
2003-10-17 22:18           ` ron minnich [this message]
2003-10-20  1:38             ` okamoto
2003-10-17 21:36         ` Roman Shaposhnick
2003-10-20 10:33           ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-10-21  0:10             ` [9fans] Re: your mail Roman Shaposhnick
2003-10-17 23:38       ` [9fans] porting from vs. porting to Plan 9 Geoff Collyer
2003-10-18  1:21         ` bs
2003-10-21 10:14           ` Martin C.Atkins
2003-10-18  8:27         ` Charles Forsyth
2003-10-18  8:48           ` Richard Miller
2003-10-18 11:09           ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-18 13:09             ` Tristan Seligmann
2003-10-19  8:25               ` C H Forsyth
2003-10-20  3:28                 ` mirtchov
2003-10-20  7:04                   ` Tristan Seligmann
2003-10-20 17:17                     ` mirtchov
2003-10-20 10:35                   ` Patrick R. Wade
2003-10-21  1:14                     ` david parsons
2003-10-19 16:27             ` Charles Forsyth
2003-10-20 10:35             ` bs
2003-10-18 19:19           ` Richard Miller
2003-10-19 15:10             ` I RATTAN
2003-10-19 15:54               ` Richard Miller
2003-10-20 14:03             ` ron minnich
2003-10-20 17:03               ` jmk
2003-10-20 21:40         ` splite
2003-10-17 16:43 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2003-10-17 17:01   ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2003-10-17 20:17     ` Christopher Nielsen
2003-10-20 10:33       ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-10-17 15:36 steve-simon
2003-10-17 16:05 Richard C Bilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0310171611480.12875-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov \
    --to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).