[Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Kenichi Asai]

On OCaml 4.12.0 on M1 mac, I got:

# 0.1 +. 0.2;;
- : float = 0.300000000000000044
# string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.3"

Why don't I obtain "0.300000000000000044" here?

Here is some background.  I am writing an OCaml interpreter that
mimics most part of the original OCaml interpreter.  In the OCaml
interpreter, 0.1 and 0.2 are represented as

Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.1", None))
Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.2", None))

When I add these two numbers, I would have to execute

let a = float_of_string "0.1"
let b = float_of_string "0.2"
let c = a +. b
let d = string_of_float c

and then return

Pexp_constant (Pconst_float (d, None))

At this point, however, since d is "0.3" instead of
"0.300000000000000044" (even though c is 0.300000000000000044), I
cannot return 0.300000000000000044 as a result.  How can I mimic the
OCaml behavior?

Sincerely,

-- 
Kenichi Asai

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Andreas Rossberg]

You can use sprintf, which allows you to specify a precision:

# Printf.sprintf "%g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.3"
# Printf.sprintf "%.16g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.3"
# Printf.sprintf "%.18g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = "0.300000000000000044"
# Printf.sprintf "%.24g" (0.1 +. 0.2);;
- : string = “0.300000000000000044408921”

The OCaml manual does not say what the default is, but it appears to be .6 for printf (like in C), while string_of_float is equivalent to (sprintf "%.12g”) and the REPL uses .18 (which is the maximum meaningful decimal precision for 64 bit floats):

# Printf.sprintf "%g" 0.1234567890123456789;;
- : string = "0.123457"
# string_of_float 0.123456789012345678;;
- : string = “0.123456789012”
# 0.1234567890123456789;;
- : float = 0.123456789012345677

/Andreas


> On 15. 6. 2022, at 03:59, Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp> wrote:
> 
> On OCaml 4.12.0 on M1 mac, I got:
> 
> # 0.1 +. 0.2;;
> - : float = 0.300000000000000044
> # string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2);;
> - : string = "0.3"
> 
> Why don't I obtain "0.300000000000000044" here?
> 
> Here is some background.  I am writing an OCaml interpreter that
> mimics most part of the original OCaml interpreter.  In the OCaml
> interpreter, 0.1 and 0.2 are represented as
> 
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.1", None))
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.2", None))
> 
> When I add these two numbers, I would have to execute
> 
> let a = float_of_string "0.1"
> let b = float_of_string "0.2"
> let c = a +. b
> let d = string_of_float c
> 
> and then return
> 
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float (d, None))
> 
> At this point, however, since d is "0.3" instead of
> "0.300000000000000044" (even though c is 0.300000000000000044), I
> cannot return 0.300000000000000044 as a result.  How can I mimic the
> OCaml behavior?
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> -- 
> Kenichi Asai

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[François Pottier]

Hi,

Le 15/06/2022 à 08:22, Andreas Rossberg a écrit :
 > The OCaml manual does not say what the default is, but it appears to 
be .6 for printf (like in C), while string_of_float is equivalent to 
(sprintf "%.12g”) and the REPL uses .18 (which is the maximum meaningful 
decimal precision for 64 bit floats):

Indeed, the implementation of string_of_float uses "%.12g".

The manual says that string_of_float returns "the" string representation 
of a
floating-point number. I would claim that there is a problem here -- either
the manual should warn that there is a potential loss of information, or the
code should be fixed so as to lose no information.

--
François Pottier
francois.pottier@inria.fr
http://cambium.inria.fr/~fpottier/

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Gabriel Scherer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2049 bytes --]

Nathanaëlle Courant, with help from Julien Lepiller and myself, wrote a
rather complete interpreter/evaluator for OCaml parsetrees (in OCaml) as
part of the Camlboot project

  https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09231
  https://github.com/Ekdohibs/camlboot
  https://github.com/Ekdohibs/camlboot/tree/master/interpreter

We take as input OCaml parsetrees, but we evaluate into a type of "value"
that we defined ourselves, and stores a "float" for floating-point numbers:

https://github.com/Ekdohibs/camlboot/blob/2692b14a4e685387194556e511fe23057d25c6c3/interpreter/data.ml#L46-L66

type value =
...
| Float of float
...

Kenichi, I don´t understand what your own constraints, but in general I
have the impression that "float" is better than "string" to represent
double values used for computation. "string" was meant to accurately
represent the source value and avoid any serialization/portability issue,
but those constraints are rather for data exchange.

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:00 AM Kenichi Asai <asai@is.ocha.ac.jp> wrote:

> On OCaml 4.12.0 on M1 mac, I got:
>
> # 0.1 +. 0.2;;
> - : float = 0.300000000000000044
> # string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2);;
> - : string = "0.3"
>
> Why don't I obtain "0.300000000000000044" here?
>
> Here is some background.  I am writing an OCaml interpreter that
> mimics most part of the original OCaml interpreter.  In the OCaml
> interpreter, 0.1 and 0.2 are represented as
>
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.1", None))
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float ("0.2", None))
>
> When I add these two numbers, I would have to execute
>
> let a = float_of_string "0.1"
> let b = float_of_string "0.2"
> let c = a +. b
> let d = string_of_float c
>
> and then return
>
> Pexp_constant (Pconst_float (d, None))
>
> At this point, however, since d is "0.3" instead of
> "0.300000000000000044" (even though c is 0.300000000000000044), I
> cannot return 0.300000000000000044 as a result.  How can I mimic the
> OCaml behavior?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> --
> Kenichi Asai
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3093 bytes --]

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Daniel Bünzli]

On 15 June 2022 at 16:07:58, Gabriel Scherer (gabriel.scherer@gmail.com) wrote:

> Kenichi, I don´t understand what your own constraints, but  
> in general I have the impression that "float" is better than "string"  
> to represent double values used for computation.

If there a reason not to do what Gabriel suggests you can serialize a bit-by-bit accurate representation of floats[^1] by using `Format.sprintf "%h"`. This format can be input again with float_of_string.

Daniel

[^1]: There may be edge cases with nans since those will all be serialized to the string "nan" and input back as OCaml's Float.nan value.

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Kenichi Asai]

Thank you all for the information.

> Nathanaëlle Courant, with help from Julien Lepiller and myself, wrote a
> rather complete interpreter/evaluator for OCaml parsetrees (in OCaml) as
> part of the Camlboot project

Yes, I read the programming paper.  That's an interesting project.

> Kenichi, I don't understand what your own constraints, but
> in general I have the impression that "float" is better than "string"
> to represent double values used for computation.

I am developing an OCaml stepper that executes an OCaml program step
by step.  From the OCaml parsetree for

let a = 0.1 +. 0.2 +. 0.4

I want an OCaml parsetree for

let a = 0.3 +. 0.4

or

let a = 0.300000000000000044 +. 0.4

if this is what OCaml uses internally.  I want to produce an OCaml
parsetree rather than my own parsetree that maintains float as is,
because I could then reuse pretty printer of OCaml.

From Andreas' e-mail, I understand what's happening.  (Thank you!)  I
thought I would use Printf.sprintf "%.18g" in place of string_of_float,
but Daniel's e-mail made me think it could be insufficient, because
even if I use .18 (or .24), it is still an approximation of the float.
(Am I correct?)  I tried to use `Format.sprintf "%h"` in place of
string_of_float, but the OCaml pretty printer produces

let a = 0x1.3333333333334p-2 +. 0.4

which is not suitable for a stepper used by novice programmers.  For
now, I think I will use Printf.sprintf "%.18g" and see if students see
any difference between OCaml execution and stepper execution.

I agree with Francois that it would be nice if the OCaml manual could
mention a potential loss of information.  I first thought that
replacing "%.12g" with "%.18g" solves the problem, but "the" string
representation of a float turned out to be more complicated than I
thought.

Thank you all for the discussion!

Sincerely,

-- 
Kenichi Asai

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Oleg]

Actually the similar problem of accurately conveying floats also
occurs in MetaOCaml/Code generation. After all, what you are doing is
a sort of reflection.

First of all, accurate (lossless) printing of floats is a research
area in itself. The latest result is

  http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/cs257/archive/florian-loitsch/printf.pdf
  https://github.com/google/double-conversion

Perhaps some day it can be incorporated in OCaml, so that
string_of_float truly returns *the* printable representation of a float.

Hexademical printout (which is also supported in C) 
mentioned by Daniel Buenzli is another way -- provided we don't
actually have to look at the printed value, because we probably won't
understand it anyway.

In practice in our recent project, we settled on

let float : float -> float cde = fun x ->
  let str = if Float.is_integer x then string_of_float x else
            Printf.sprintf "%.17g" x

which seems to work well. At least, it solved the problems when the
results of our generated signal processing code differed slightly from
the results of the hand-written reference C code, due to slightly
different printed FP values in FP array initializers (filter
coefficients). We used to use string_of_float back then. With the
above float, the problem is solved.

I have to add that float above does not account for NaN, plus/minus
infinity and -0. So, the fully production code also has to add these
cases.

Re: [Caml-list] string_of_float (0.1 +. 0.2)

[Andreas Rossberg]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]

Since I believe it hasn’t been stated explicitly in this thread yet, a reminder that it is generally _impossible_ to represent arbitrary float values accurately (and finitely) in decimal notation. Except for few cases, you will have to cut off and round at some point.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean that round-tripping between text and binary loses precision, as long as the rounding is precise enough for both binary-to-text and text-to-binary conversion. Though as Oleg points out, that is not an easy problem.

> On 16. 6. 2022, at 08:24, Oleg <oleg@okmij.org> wrote:
> 
> In practice in our recent project, we settled on
> 
> let float : float -> float cde = fun x ->
>  let str = if Float.is_integer x then string_of_float x else
>            Printf.sprintf "%.17g" x

"%.17g" is what we use in the WebAssembly reference interpreter as well. Plus, we do some extra work to also preserve -0.0 and NaNs. Simplified a bit, it's something like this:

  let float_to_string x =
    let x' = abs_float x in
    (if Int64.bits_of_float x < 0L then "-" else "") ^
    if x' <> x' then
      let payload = Int64.(logand (bits_of_float x') 0x000f_ffff_ffff_ffffL) in
      "nan:0x" ^ Printf.sprintf "%Lx" payload
    else
      let s = Printf.sprintf "%.17g" x' in
      if s.[String.length s - 1] = '.' then s ^ "0" else s

Our of_string function recognises the special NaN syntax accordingly.

/Andreas


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2684 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Jean-Denis EIDEN JEAN-DENIS]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 357 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Gustave Nimant]

unsubscribe

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Gustave Nimant]

unsubscribe

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[daniel Ding]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12 bytes --]

unsubscribe

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 133 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Bryan Starbuck]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11 bytes --]

unsubscribe

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 440 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[jean-denis eiden]

unsubscribe

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Dan Frumin]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[jean-denis eiden]

unsubscribe

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Yawar Amin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2776 bytes --]

Oh, you're right–that seems to be what's happening. I checked messages sent
_only_ to the list, and they have the headers as expected. Unfortunately
Gmail is still not showing the expected 'Unsubscribe' UI–no doubt part of
their continuous A/B testing or something.

Regards,

Yawar

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 4:08 PM Philippe Wang <mail@philippewang.info> wrote:

> By any chance, did you check only for an email that was sent to both
> the list and your gmail address? In which case, GMail merges the
> different emails into a single email, so it could totally lose some
> information.
>
> I just checked for my present account on its GMail web interface and
> the list-unsubscribe header is present.
>
> Cheers
> Philippe Wang
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:42 AM Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, this is puzzling indeed–I notice there's no 'List-Unsubscribe'
> header in the messages that reach my Gmail inbox, but it _is_ present in
> the message that gets archived at e.g.
> https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw
> >
> > And in fact Gmail is not showing the 'unsubscribe' UI that it normally
> would if it found the 'List-Unsubscribe' header. Looks like something is
> stripping out the 'List-*' and perhaps other headers before delivering them
> to Gmail.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Yawar
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 1:33 PM Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:28 PM Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps this mailing list can be configured to automatically add (to
> each message) instructions for unsubscribing? I.e. go to
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/signoff/caml-list , enter your email
> address, and click to unsubscribe.
> >>
> >>
> >> This used to be the case, but such rewriting of messages was causing
> problems with DKIM and other email integrity checking scheme.
> >>
> >> So, currently, we're just relying on subscribers to not be stupid and
> not send "unsubscribe" messages to the whole list.
> >>
> >> The proper "List-Unsubscribe" header is added to every message, and a
> working e-mail client should take advantage of it to offer an "unsubscribe
> from this mailing-list" option.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> - Xavier Leroy
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Yawar
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:58 AM Van Chan Ngo <chan.ngo2203@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Unsubscribe
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>> > On Jan 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Adam Johnson <adamjohnson@nhyne.dev>
> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > unsubscribe
>
>
>
> --
> Philippe Wang
>    mail@philippewang.info
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4192 bytes --]

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Philippe Wang]

By any chance, did you check only for an email that was sent to both
the list and your gmail address? In which case, GMail merges the
different emails into a single email, so it could totally lose some
information.

I just checked for my present account on its GMail web interface and
the list-unsubscribe header is present.

Cheers
Philippe Wang

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:42 AM Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually, this is puzzling indeed–I notice there's no 'List-Unsubscribe' header in the messages that reach my Gmail inbox, but it _is_ present in the message that gets archived at e.g. https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw
>
> And in fact Gmail is not showing the 'unsubscribe' UI that it normally would if it found the 'List-Unsubscribe' header. Looks like something is stripping out the 'List-*' and perhaps other headers before delivering them to Gmail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Yawar
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 1:33 PM Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:28 PM Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps this mailing list can be configured to automatically add (to each message) instructions for unsubscribing? I.e. go to https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/signoff/caml-list , enter your email address, and click to unsubscribe.
>>
>>
>> This used to be the case, but such rewriting of messages was causing problems with DKIM and other email integrity checking scheme.
>>
>> So, currently, we're just relying on subscribers to not be stupid and not send "unsubscribe" messages to the whole list.
>>
>> The proper "List-Unsubscribe" header is added to every message, and a working e-mail client should take advantage of it to offer an "unsubscribe from this mailing-list" option.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> - Xavier Leroy
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Yawar
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:58 AM Van Chan Ngo <chan.ngo2203@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> > On Jan 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Adam Johnson <adamjohnson@nhyne.dev> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > unsubscribe



-- 
Philippe Wang
   mail@philippewang.info

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Yawar Amin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1879 bytes --]

Gmail and some other clients support it, more details here
https://sendgrid.com/blog/list-unsubscribe/
<https://sendgrid.com/blog/list-unsubscribe/#:~:text=List%2Dunsubscribe%20is%20an%20optional,sender%20as%20spam%20or%20junk.>

Regards,

Yawar

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 2:52 PM Daniil Baturin <daniil@baturin.org> wrote:

> Looks like GMail (or something else in the middle) indeed messes with
> headers.
>
> I get the correct headers in the messages received by a self-hosted
> Postfix:
>
> List-Id: <caml-list.inria.fr>
> List-Help: <mailto:sympa_inria@inria.fr?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa_inria@inria.fr
> ?subject=subscribe%20caml-list>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa_inria@inria.fr
> ?subject=unsubscribe%20caml-list>
> List-Post: <mailto:caml-list@inria.fr>
> List-Owner: <mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr>
> List-Archive: <http://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list>
>
> However, Thunderbird doesn't seem to offer an unsubscribe option based on
> that header, and I can't remember any email client where I'd have seen that
> functionality.
>
>
> On 1/5/21 2:42 AM, Yawar Amin wrote:
> > Actually, this is puzzling indeed–I notice there's no
> > 'List-Unsubscribe' header in the messages that reach my Gmail inbox,
> > but it _is_ present in the message that gets archived at
> > e.g.
> https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw
> > <
> https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw
> >
> >
> >
> > And in fact Gmail is not showing the 'unsubscribe' UI that it normally
> > would if it found the 'List-Unsubscribe' header. Looks like something
> > is stripping out the 'List-*' and perhaps other headers before
> > delivering them to Gmail.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Yawar
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3152 bytes --]

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Daniil Baturin]

Looks like GMail (or something else in the middle) indeed messes with
headers.

I get the correct headers in the messages received by a self-hosted Postfix:

List-Id: <caml-list.inria.fr>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa_inria@inria.fr?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa_inria@inria.fr?subject=subscribe%20caml-list>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa_inria@inria.fr?subject=unsubscribe%20caml-list>
List-Post: <mailto:caml-list@inria.fr>
List-Owner: <mailto:caml-list-request@inria.fr>
List-Archive: <http://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list>

However, Thunderbird doesn't seem to offer an unsubscribe option based on that header, and I can't remember any email client where I'd have seen that functionality.


On 1/5/21 2:42 AM, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Actually, this is puzzling indeed–I notice there's no
> 'List-Unsubscribe' header in the messages that reach my Gmail inbox,
> but it _is_ present in the message that gets archived at
> e.g. https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw
> <https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw>
>
>
> And in fact Gmail is not showing the 'unsubscribe' UI that it normally
> would if it found the 'List-Unsubscribe' header. Looks like something
> is stripping out the 'List-*' and perhaps other headers before
> delivering them to Gmail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Yawar

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Yawar Amin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1751 bytes --]

Actually, this is puzzling indeed–I notice there's no 'List-Unsubscribe'
header in the messages that reach my Gmail inbox, but it _is_ present in
the message that gets archived at e.g.
https://inbox.ocaml.org/caml-list/CAH=h3gEOoMUBezUb3NoXvksX34ke3etP8=aScYeCzRc9p-ehrg@mail.gmail.com/raw

And in fact Gmail is not showing the 'unsubscribe' UI that it normally
would if it found the 'List-Unsubscribe' header. Looks like something is
stripping out the 'List-*' and perhaps other headers before delivering them
to Gmail.

Regards,

Yawar

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 1:33 PM Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:28 PM Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps this mailing list can be configured to automatically add (to each
>> message) instructions for unsubscribing? I.e. go to
>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/signoff/caml-list , enter your email
>> address, and click to unsubscribe.
>>
>
> This used to be the case, but such rewriting of messages was causing
> problems with DKIM and other email integrity checking scheme.
>
> So, currently, we're just relying on subscribers to not be stupid and not
> send "unsubscribe" messages to the whole list.
>
> The proper "List-Unsubscribe" header is added to every message, and a
> working e-mail client should take advantage of it to offer an "unsubscribe
> from this mailing-list" option.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Xavier Leroy
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Yawar
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:58 AM Van Chan Ngo <chan.ngo2203@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Unsubscribe
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> > On Jan 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Adam Johnson <adamjohnson@nhyne.dev>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > unsubscribe
>>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3287 bytes --]

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Xavier Leroy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1028 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:28 PM Yawar Amin <yawar.amin@gmail.com> wrote:

> Perhaps this mailing list can be configured to automatically add (to each
> message) instructions for unsubscribing? I.e. go to
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/signoff/caml-list , enter your email
> address, and click to unsubscribe.
>

This used to be the case, but such rewriting of messages was causing
problems with DKIM and other email integrity checking scheme.

So, currently, we're just relying on subscribers to not be stupid and not
send "unsubscribe" messages to the whole list.

The proper "List-Unsubscribe" header is added to every message, and a
working e-mail client should take advantage of it to offer an "unsubscribe
from this mailing-list" option.

Regards,

- Xavier Leroy


> Regards,
>
> Yawar
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:58 AM Van Chan Ngo <chan.ngo2203@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Unsubscribe
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Jan 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Adam Johnson <adamjohnson@nhyne.dev>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > unsubscribe
>>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2160 bytes --]

Re: [Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Yawar Amin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 462 bytes --]

Perhaps this mailing list can be configured to automatically add (to each
message) instructions for unsubscribing? I.e. go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/signoff/caml-list , enter your email address,
and click to unsubscribe.

Regards,

Yawar

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:58 AM Van Chan Ngo <chan.ngo2203@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unsubscribe
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Adam Johnson <adamjohnson@nhyne.dev> wrote:
> >
> > unsubscribe
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 952 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Van Chan Ngo]

Unsubscribe

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 4, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Adam Johnson <adamjohnson@nhyne.dev> wrote:
> 
> unsubscribe 

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Adam Johnson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11 bytes --]

unsubscribe

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 44 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Alexei]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12 bytes --]

unsubscribe

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 90 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Hunter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12 bytes --]

unsubscribe

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 33 bytes --]

[Caml-list] unsubscribe

[Hunter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1 bytes --]



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 26 bytes --]