From: Matt Armstrong <matt@lickey.com>
Subject: Re: TMDA (was: new spam functionality added)
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 13:32:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bs8bygij.fsf@naz.lickey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87u1m5w14y.fsf@doohan.bang.priv.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Thu, 08 Aug 2002 22:23:25 +0200")
Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
>>>>>> Matt Armstrong <matt@lickey.com>:
>
>> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
>
>> All types of automatic replies should go to the envelope sender.
>
> Not _all_ types of automatic replies.
>
> Bounces should go to the envelope sender, but I can't offhand think
> of any others that should.
This isn't an authoritative reference, but this draft gives (I think)
good arguments to the contrary:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moore-auto-email-response-00.txt
>> Failure to do that is how you end up with auto-replies getting sent
>> to mailing lists, etc.
>
> A proper auto-replier (I'm guessing you mean a vacation-like program
> here?) shouldn't be sending a notification in the first place, if
> the incoming message isn't addressed to the recipient.
Agreed -- this is suggested in the above mentioned draft too.
> If an auto-replier in its infinite wisdom decides to send a
> notification anyway, it shouldn't send it to the envelope address,
> which in this case is the list manager. It should send it to the
> address in the From: field, which is supposed to be the address of
> the person that sent the message to the list.
I disagree with you here. The list admin is in a better position to
kick the offending user off the list or otherwise fix the problem.
The current debian 'vacation' program replies to the envelope sender,
and I assume it has been that way for a long time. So there is some
historical precedent as well.
>> Probably best to fix your envelope sender.
>
> The envelope sender in question, was the default envelope
> configuraton for exim in debian woody. AFAIR it was the same as the
> default envelope in SuSE 6.2, ie. username@FQDN.
>
> Some people would debate that this is the correct value for the
> envelope sender.
I assumed the envelope sender you were using wasn't actually reaching
you.
If so, I'd call that a configuration error. I think it is reasonable
to expect the envelope sender to be valid -- the SMTP bounce and
delivery status mechanisms depend on it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-09 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-31 19:24 new spam functionality added Ted Zlatanov
2002-07-31 19:54 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-07-31 20:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-07-31 20:14 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-31 20:25 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 20:34 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-07-31 20:41 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 21:03 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-07-31 21:08 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-07-31 21:12 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 21:38 ` Paul Jarc
2002-07-31 23:19 ` David Masterson
2002-07-31 23:08 ` Frank Schmitt
2002-08-01 17:03 ` Josh Huber
2002-08-01 17:38 ` Harry Putnam
2002-08-01 19:16 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-01 22:43 ` Harry Putnam
2002-08-05 17:16 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-01 1:25 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-01 1:33 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-01 2:17 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-01 19:20 ` David Masterson
2002-08-01 20:00 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-02 23:37 ` Florian Weimer
2002-08-02 23:45 ` Russ Allbery
2002-08-03 10:23 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 13:47 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-03 16:01 ` hashcash (was Re: new spam functionality added) Simon Josefsson
2002-08-04 6:55 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-01 19:17 ` new spam functionality added David Masterson
2002-08-01 19:59 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-07-31 21:07 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-07-31 21:35 ` Paul Jarc
2002-07-31 21:58 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 21:47 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 21:54 ` Paul Jarc
2002-07-31 22:05 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 22:10 ` Paul Jarc
2002-07-31 22:35 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-07-31 23:10 ` Josh Huber
2002-08-01 16:56 ` Paul Jarc
2002-07-31 23:30 ` Alan Shutko
2002-08-01 19:25 ` David Masterson
2002-08-01 19:33 ` Josh Huber
2002-08-01 22:06 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-01 22:13 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-01 22:18 ` Jack Twilley
2002-08-01 22:23 ` TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Paul Jarc
2002-08-01 22:40 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-01 23:29 ` Josh Huber
2002-08-02 2:11 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-01 19:34 ` new spam functionality added Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-01 19:39 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-01 21:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-23 1:50 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-08-23 2:42 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2002-08-23 3:10 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 0:10 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-12-30 2:31 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 2:52 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-12-30 3:13 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 3:27 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-12-30 3:44 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 4:12 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-12-30 4:48 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 5:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-12-30 19:03 ` spam.el now supports blackholes by default Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 21:41 ` Matt Armstrong
2002-12-30 22:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-30 23:38 ` spam.el proposed group parameters Ted Zlatanov
2002-12-31 0:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-05 16:58 ` spam.el now supports blackholes by default luis fernandes
2003-01-05 22:07 ` Ted Zlatanov
2003-01-06 2:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-02 2:05 ` new spam functionality added Jason R. Mastaler
2002-08-02 3:43 ` Russ Allbery
2002-08-02 4:29 ` Jason R. Mastaler
2002-08-02 4:34 ` Russ Allbery
2002-08-02 16:17 ` TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Paul Jarc
2002-08-02 21:46 ` Russ Allbery
2002-08-02 21:53 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-05 17:38 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-05 17:49 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-05 17:57 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-05 20:18 ` David Masterson
2002-08-05 20:46 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-05 21:50 ` Russ Allbery
2002-08-06 0:43 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-06 3:04 ` David Masterson
2002-08-06 14:27 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-06 17:13 ` David Masterson
2002-08-06 17:26 ` David Masterson
2002-08-06 18:08 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-07 12:02 ` Lloyd Zusman
2002-12-30 0:22 ` Hashcash (was: TMDA) Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-02 18:33 ` Hashcash Simon Josefsson
2003-01-02 19:25 ` Hashcash Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2003-01-02 21:01 ` Hashcash Simon Josefsson
2003-01-02 21:05 ` Hashcash Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-05 18:30 ` TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-05 20:46 ` David Masterson
2002-08-05 21:33 ` Stainless Steel Rat
2002-08-06 3:28 ` David Masterson
2002-08-06 16:02 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-08 9:21 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-08 15:34 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-08 19:57 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-08 20:17 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-08 21:30 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-08 21:35 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-08 22:27 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-08 17:26 ` Matt Armstrong
2002-08-08 20:23 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-09 19:32 ` Matt Armstrong [this message]
2002-08-10 9:23 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-10 17:21 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-11 8:41 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-11 14:58 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-11 8:47 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-12 16:04 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-12 21:38 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-12 22:40 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-13 9:21 ` Steinar Bang
2002-08-05 20:11 ` David Masterson
2002-08-06 2:15 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-06 10:10 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-06 13:20 ` Scott A Crosby
2002-08-06 16:13 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-16 14:23 ` new spam functionality added clemens fischer
2002-08-05 17:07 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-07-31 20:46 ` Jack Twilley
2002-07-31 21:01 ` Josh Huber
2002-07-31 21:03 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-31 21:51 ` David Masterson
2002-07-31 21:08 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-07-31 22:05 ` David Masterson
2002-07-31 23:32 ` Alan Shutko
2002-08-01 17:00 ` Paul Jarc
2002-08-05 18:07 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-05 18:23 ` TMDA (was: new spam functionality added) Paul Jarc
2002-08-05 23:41 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-06 10:27 ` Per Abrahamsen
2002-08-06 15:57 ` Paul Jarc
2002-07-31 20:35 ` new spam functionality added Ted Zlatanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bs8bygij.fsf@naz.lickey.com \
--to=matt@lickey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).