Please consider setting up a bug tracker?

Please consider setting up a bug tracker?

[Jukka Jylänki]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1139 bytes --]

Hi,

I just recently registered to the musl mailing list to report a bug, since
the FAQ here http://www.musl-libc.org/faq.html mentioned that there is no
separate tracker to report bugs to.

Afterwards, I now realize that this was a bad idea, since the sheer amount
of uninteresting emails that I began getting make it difficult to filter
out the discussion around musl from the potential discussion to the bug I
reported, and I find it simplest to unregister from the mailing list after
reporting the bug. However, this kind of "fire and forget" bug reporting
feels bad, and I lose the way to keep in touch with the communication
around the bug.

I see that the issue of setting up a bug tracker has already been discussed
before here http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/09/05/1 . Has anything
changed with this respect?

My recommendation would be to just set up a github repository and use the
github workflow of issues and pull requests for development, since that is
extremely popular for modern open source development and works well also
for non-core developers to chime in to the fun.

All the best to musl, it rocks!
   Jukka

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1430 bytes --]

Re: Please consider setting up a bug tracker?

[Rich Felker]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 05:22:32PM +0200, Jukka Jylänki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just recently registered to the musl mailing list to report a bug, since
> the FAQ here http://www.musl-libc.org/faq.html mentioned that there is no
> separate tracker to report bugs to.
> 
> Afterwards, I now realize that this was a bad idea, since the sheer amount
> of uninteresting emails that I began getting make it difficult to filter
> out the discussion around musl from the potential discussion to the bug I
> reported, and I find it simplest to unregister from the mailing list after
> reporting the bug. However, this kind of "fire and forget" bug reporting
> feels bad, and I lose the way to keep in touch with the communication
> around the bug.
> 
> I see that the issue of setting up a bug tracker has already been discussed
> before here http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/09/05/1 . Has anything
> changed with this respect?

No, but I want a bug/patch tracker more than ever right now. There
have been a lot of patches (and a few bug reports) coming in lately
and it's hard to keep track of them all manually. So far bugzilla is
probably the main candidate, but I also looked at a few others. I'd
welcome input on what works well (both from a user standpoint and from
an implementation-quality/hosting-considerations standpoint).

As for having to subscribe to the list right now, you don't need to.
You can report bugs as a non-subscriber. Mail goes to a moderation
queue but I'll approve it. Please just include a note if you want to
be CC'd on replies.

> My recommendation would be to just set up a github repository and use the
> github workflow of issues and pull requests for development, since that is
> extremely popular for modern open source development and works well also
> for non-core developers to chime in to the fun.

Not going to happen. github is utterly hideous to work with. It's slow
as molasses (the web ui), often down, and doesn't integrate well with
other tools. They also have the absolute worst web-based git repo
browser, which is completely unjustifiable when the best one (cgit) is
free and essentially included with git.

Rich

Re: Please consider setting up a bug tracker?

[Jukka Jylänki]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2763 bytes --]

Oh, submitting without registering to the list sounds good, I'll do that
then.

As for github, adjectives like "utterly hideous", "slow as molasses" and
"often down" are of course subjective opinions, so I don't have any say on
that, but can I ask what kind of integration limitations it has that are
needed? Also, I haven't used cgit - what makes it better than GitHub in
your opinion?

2015-02-15 18:16 GMT+02:00 Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>:

> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 05:22:32PM +0200, Jukka Jylänki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just recently registered to the musl mailing list to report a bug,
> since
> > the FAQ here http://www.musl-libc.org/faq.html mentioned that there is
> no
> > separate tracker to report bugs to.
> >
> > Afterwards, I now realize that this was a bad idea, since the sheer
> amount
> > of uninteresting emails that I began getting make it difficult to filter
> > out the discussion around musl from the potential discussion to the bug I
> > reported, and I find it simplest to unregister from the mailing list
> after
> > reporting the bug. However, this kind of "fire and forget" bug reporting
> > feels bad, and I lose the way to keep in touch with the communication
> > around the bug.
> >
> > I see that the issue of setting up a bug tracker has already been
> discussed
> > before here http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/09/05/1 . Has
> anything
> > changed with this respect?
>
> No, but I want a bug/patch tracker more than ever right now. There
> have been a lot of patches (and a few bug reports) coming in lately
> and it's hard to keep track of them all manually. So far bugzilla is
> probably the main candidate, but I also looked at a few others. I'd
> welcome input on what works well (both from a user standpoint and from
> an implementation-quality/hosting-considerations standpoint).
>
> As for having to subscribe to the list right now, you don't need to.
> You can report bugs as a non-subscriber. Mail goes to a moderation
> queue but I'll approve it. Please just include a note if you want to
> be CC'd on replies.
>
> > My recommendation would be to just set up a github repository and use the
> > github workflow of issues and pull requests for development, since that
> is
> > extremely popular for modern open source development and works well also
> > for non-core developers to chime in to the fun.
>
> Not going to happen. github is utterly hideous to work with. It's slow
> as molasses (the web ui), often down, and doesn't integrate well with
> other tools. They also have the absolute worst web-based git repo
> browser, which is completely unjustifiable when the best one (cgit) is
> free and essentially included with git.
>
> Rich
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3519 bytes --]

Re: Please consider setting up a bug tracker?

[Luca Barbato]

On 15/02/15 17:16, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 05:22:32PM +0200, Jukka Jylänki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just recently registered to the musl mailing list to report a bug, since
>> the FAQ here http://www.musl-libc.org/faq.html mentioned that there is no
>> separate tracker to report bugs to.
>>
>> Afterwards, I now realize that this was a bad idea, since the sheer amount
>> of uninteresting emails that I began getting make it difficult to filter
>> out the discussion around musl from the potential discussion to the bug I
>> reported, and I find it simplest to unregister from the mailing list after
>> reporting the bug. However, this kind of "fire and forget" bug reporting
>> feels bad, and I lose the way to keep in touch with the communication
>> around the bug.
>>
>> I see that the issue of setting up a bug tracker has already been discussed
>> before here http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/09/05/1 . Has anything
>> changed with this respect?
>
> No, but I want a bug/patch tracker more than ever right now. There
> have been a lot of patches (and a few bug reports) coming in lately
> and it's hard to keep track of them all manually. So far bugzilla is
> probably the main candidate, but I also looked at a few others. I'd
> welcome input on what works well (both from a user standpoint and from
> an implementation-quality/hosting-considerations standpoint).

I tried to do a run about few months ago and so far bugzilla remains the 
best overall.

If you want to keep the mailinglist workflow you might look at patchwork 
or, once I manage to complete it, plaid.

lu

Re: Please consider setting up a bug tracker?

[Rich Felker]

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 06:32:25PM +0200, Jukka Jylänki wrote:
> Oh, submitting without registering to the list sounds good, I'll do that
> then.
> 
> As for github, adjectives like "utterly hideous", "slow as molasses" and
> "often down" are of course subjective opinions, so I don't have any say on
> that, but can I ask what kind of integration limitations it has that are
> needed? Also, I haven't used cgit - what makes it better than GitHub in
> your opinion?

Well they're not precise measurements, but the speed and downtime are
quantifiable, so not exactly subjective either. With regards to speed,
I find clicks (even to open tiny files) take several seconds to
respond on github's git browser, and it's all time spent in
client-side javascript, which loads a representation (json iirc) of
the data and then transforms it to html client-side. Compare this to
cgit (what we have on the musl site) which loads instantly.

Rich