From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] security
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:48:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875210C0-4D03-4599-B573-DDFB38B9C32A@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920710281143m5733e766xce46826611a7adf4@mail.gmail.com>
I vote to Uriel.
On 2007/10/29, at 3:43, Uriel wrote:
>
> I'm still wondering what is the cost of having path be (/bin .) (other
> than running scripts actually becoming much faster when access to . is
> slow).
>
> For once I'm with don, just because perfect security is impossible
> doesn't mean we should stop trying to get closer to it, specially when
> the cost (as far as anyone has been able to tell in this case) is
> negligible.
>
> What is next? we get rid of file permissions 'because your coworkers
> can already pick the pile of papers lying on your desk so you should
> trust them anyway.
>
> Seeing this kinds of arguments is quite sad, specially given how far
> ahead plan9 is from every other system when it comes to *real*
> *practical* security.
>
> And I'm an idiot, but this whole discussion has become quite stupid.
>
> uriel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-28 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-26 22:38 [9fans] grap retarded?? Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-26 23:17 ` geoff
2007-10-26 23:22 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-27 2:51 ` [9fans] detecting spam arisawa
2007-10-27 3:16 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-27 4:38 ` [9fans] security erik quanstrom
2007-10-27 9:03 ` roger peppe
2007-10-27 10:04 ` arisawa
2007-10-27 12:48 ` Uriel
2007-10-27 14:54 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-27 17:19 ` Tim Newsham
2007-10-27 19:18 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-27 22:20 ` don bailey
2007-10-27 22:25 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-27 22:33 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 0:17 ` David Leimbach
2007-10-28 6:00 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-10-28 6:06 ` john
2007-10-28 8:32 ` Joel C. Salomon
2007-10-28 20:53 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-27 23:40 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-10-28 6:11 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 6:30 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-10-28 6:42 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 7:28 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-10-28 12:53 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-28 15:52 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 15:51 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 15:59 ` Iruata Souza
2007-10-28 16:30 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 17:14 ` Iruata Souza
2007-10-28 17:22 ` Gabriel Diaz
2007-10-28 17:44 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-28 20:37 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-10-28 16:10 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-28 16:26 ` don bailey
2007-10-28 18:30 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-10-28 18:43 ` Uriel
2007-10-28 18:58 ` Iruata Souza
2007-10-28 22:48 ` arisawa [this message]
2007-10-28 23:29 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-29 2:30 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-10-27 9:00 ` [9fans] detecting spam roger peppe
2007-10-27 13:16 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-27 13:41 ` erik quanstrom
2007-10-27 13:43 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-27 14:04 ` Martin Neubauer
2007-10-29 10:10 ` [9fans] grap retarded?? Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-10-29 18:43 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2007-10-29 10:10 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875210C0-4D03-4599-B573-DDFB38B9C32A@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp \
--to=arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).