From: Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Just shoot me now
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:24:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bp4es21b.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ipymu0k7.fsf_-_@verilab.com> (Tommy Kelly's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:13:28 -0600")
On Wed, Dec 22 2010, Tommy Kelly wrote:
> Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>
>> Because [ and ] are not word characters. See
>> nnmail-split-fancy-syntax-table.
>
> Thanks Andreas. Unfortunately that 6,500 line variable, consisting
> mostly of pairs of parens enclosing numbers, is as clear as mud :-)
[...]
> 5. Begin building more simple splits then stumble on
> "\\[stuff\\]". Splitting isn't as keen on \\[ as it is on, say, \\. .
> 6. Told that nnmail-split-fancy-syntax-table is the clue
> 7. C-h v on that variable. Look. Puke. Look again.
> 8. Google for "emacs lisp syntax table"
> 9. Fall pretty much at the first fence on being told that a syntax table
> is a "char-table" about which I know very little
> 10. Start reading about what a char-table is
> 11. Consider reading about "aref" and "aset" since part of the basic
> description of char-tables mentions those
> 12. Stop and think "Seriously!? All this Just To Split My Mail!?"
Right, much too complicated. The solution is described in the manual:
,----[ (info "(gnus)Fancy Mail Splitting") ]
| Normally, VALUE in these splits must match a complete _word_
| according to the fundamental mode syntax table. In other words, all
| VALUE's will be implicitly surrounded by `\<...\>' markers, which are
| word delimiters. Therefore, if you use the following split, for
| example,
|
| (any "joe" "joemail")
|
| messages sent from `joedavis@foo.org' will normally not be filed in
| `joemail'. If you want to alter this behavior, you can use any of the
| following three ways:
|
| 1. You can set the `nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words' variable
| to non-`nil' in order to ignore word boundaries and instead the
| match becomes more like a grep. This variable controls whether
| partial words are matched during fancy splitting. The default
| value is `nil'.
|
| Note that it influences all VALUE's in your split rules.
|
| 2. VALUE beginning with `.*' ignores word boundaries in front of a
| word. Similarly, if VALUE ends with `.*', word boundaries in the
| rear of a word will be ignored. For example, the VALUE
| `"@example\\.com"' does not match `foo@example.com' but
| `".*@example\\.com"' does.
|
| 3. You can set the INVERT-PARTIAL flag in your split rules of the
| `(FIELD VALUE ...)' types, aforementioned in this section. If the
| flag is set, word boundaries on both sides of a word are ignored
| even if `nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words' is `nil'.
| Contrarily, if the flag is set, word boundaries are not ignored
| even if `nnmail-split-fancy-match-partial-words' is non-`nil'.
| (New in Gnus 5.10.7)
`----
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-21 22:29 What's wrong with this fancy split? Tommy Kelly
2010-12-21 22:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-21 23:50 ` Russ Allbery
2010-12-22 0:17 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 9:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:16 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:35 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 11:44 ` Bjørn Mork
2010-12-22 12:26 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 12:37 ` Tassilo Horn
2010-12-22 12:59 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 13:48 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 16:10 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:46 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 18:19 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:15 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 19:53 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:12 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 23:31 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-23 19:05 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 15:39 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 12:34 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 0:13 ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 7:24 ` Reiner Steib [this message]
2010-12-22 13:57 ` Just shoot me now Richard Riley
2010-12-22 14:18 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 15:54 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-12-22 16:30 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 16:54 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 17:12 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:14 ` Lawrence Mitchell
2010-12-22 17:43 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 18:07 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:40 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 19:25 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-22 7:26 ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Richard Riley
2010-12-22 9:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 12:53 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 18:21 ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-12-22 19:12 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:44 ` Adam Sjøgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bp4es21b.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de \
--to=reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc \
--cc=Reiner.Steib@gmx.de \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).