Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:53:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2hbe66kb0.fsf@verilab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2fwtq2lr9.fsf@igel.home>

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:

>> 8. Google for "emacs lisp syntax table"
>
> Did you know that Emacs comes with a searchable manual?

Absolutely. I use it often. And as Reiner pointed out, the answer to my
question can in fact be figured out from the manual.

So where does that leave us? 

A user who knows about and uses the searchable manual; who has shown
willing to dive into the code and to extend his searching beyond the
manual; who in general acknowledges that one doesn't use emacs or Gnus
if what you want in your editor is a set of clicky buttons and an
eye-candy-filled GUI, IS STILL HAVING DIFFICULTY.

Either the user is thick, or the documentation is thick.

Thing is -- so let's call a spade a spade -- I so *know* I'm not thick
that I wouldn't offer that as a choice if I thought I was the problem.

It's the documentation. It's fine for you -- but you're not the
audience, or at least not the whole audience.

Again, we're in Open Source land, and Lars, you, and the rest of the
coders are just Cool Dudes to whom I'm grateful for the work you've put
into this thing. I'm not *expecting* anything. 

Look at it this way. I'm merely telling you all this to save you reading
"the code" -- being the enormous literature on psychology, learning
styles, philosophy of language, and, to a good extent, literate
programming.

But, if you prefer, see Tractatus Logic-Philosophicus. ;-)

Tommy




  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-21 22:29 What's wrong with this fancy split? Tommy Kelly
2010-12-21 22:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-21 23:50   ` Russ Allbery
2010-12-22  0:17     ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  9:32     ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:16       ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:28         ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:35           ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:44             ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 11:44               ` Bjørn Mork
2010-12-22 12:26               ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 12:37                 ` Tassilo Horn
2010-12-22 12:59                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 13:48                     ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 16:10                       ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:46                         ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 18:19                           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:15                             ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 19:53                               ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:12                                 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 23:31                                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-23 19:05                                     ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 15:39               ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 12:34           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  0:13   ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  7:24     ` Just shoot me now Reiner Steib
2010-12-22 13:57       ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 14:18         ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 15:54           ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-12-22 16:30             ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 16:54               ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 17:12                 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:14                 ` Lawrence Mitchell
2010-12-22 17:43                   ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 18:07                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:40                   ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 19:25           ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-22  7:26     ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Richard Riley
2010-12-22  9:35     ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 12:53       ` Tommy Kelly [this message]
2010-12-22 18:21         ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-12-22 19:12           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:44             ` Adam Sjøgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2hbe66kb0.fsf@verilab.com \
    --to=tommy.kelly@verilab.com \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).