From: Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com>
To: Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Just shoot me now
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:54:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0hlj3hwxxz.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2wrn14vo6.fsf@verilab.com> (Tommy Kelly's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:30:33 -0600")
Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com> writes:
> Sivaram Neelakantan <nsivaram.net@gmail.com> writes:
>> Funnily, mail splitting worked for me the first time I tried apart
>> from a few minor misses. But mine were simple ones
>>
>> (setq nnmail-split-methods
>> '(("sas-l" "^Subject:.*SAS-L*")
>> ;; ("ctan-ann" "^From:.*ctan-ann*")
>> ("mail.misc" "")))
>>
>> is all I did.
>
> Ah but see that's simple splitting. That's for girls (cue slaps for
> sexism and threats to get Sacha Chua to kick my ass). Real Men use
> *fancy* splitting. And it's fancy splitting that's destroying my will
> to live. :-)
>
>> WhyTF, I didn't
>> understand it the first time around or for that matter many other
>> times before, I don't know.
>
> Exactly right. It's normal, once you become more expert to forget what
> it was like to be a newb.
>
> But a key component of writing good docs, much as in good teaching, is
> precisely the ability to rewind your mind to that first time around,
> remember what it was like to not know what you now know, and to plot a
> path forwards for the newbie.
>
> Most people find that hard. The few that can are called good
> teachers. The very best of those are called Richard Feynman.
>
>> Of course, the fault is mostly mine that I make feeble attempts at
>> learning elisp....
>
> Well yes and no. To me it's not unreasonable that if you want to get to
> grips with the dark underbelly of Gnus (or anything in emacs) you have
> to roll your sleeves up and dig into lisp. But that doesn't mean the
> documentation is fine.
>
> Again -- lest Lars, Andreas and the other Noble Writers Of Code get fed
> up with what may seem like whining, just keep hacking guys. You are much
> appreciated.
>
> Tommy
Abd just in case anyone is reading this, I still havent got an example
of fancy splitting working, Here is my setup:-
,----
| (setq spam-use-bogofilter t)
| (setq spam-use-spamassassin t)
|
| (require 'spam)
| (spam-initialize)
|
| (setq nnimap-split-inbox '("INBOX"))
| (setq nnimap-split-fancy '(| (: spam-split) "INBOX"))
|
| (setq nnmail-split-inbox '("INBOX"))
| (setq nnmail-split-fancy '(| (: spam-split) "SYS-INBOX"))
|
| (setq spam-split-disabled nil)
|
| (setq spam-autodetect-recheck-messages nil)
| (setq spam-mark-ham-unread-before-move-from-spam-group t)
| (setq spam-mark-new-messages-in-spam-group-as-spam t)
| (setq spam-split-group "Gnus-Spam")
`----
And no splitting is happening on the INBOX. I cant think what else might
be inhibiting it so if no one can help I'll try, gulp, to debug it...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-21 22:29 What's wrong with this fancy split? Tommy Kelly
2010-12-21 22:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-21 23:50 ` Russ Allbery
2010-12-22 0:17 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 9:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:16 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:35 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 11:44 ` Bjørn Mork
2010-12-22 12:26 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 12:37 ` Tassilo Horn
2010-12-22 12:59 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 13:48 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 16:10 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:46 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 18:19 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:15 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 19:53 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:12 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 23:31 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-23 19:05 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 15:39 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 12:34 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 0:13 ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 7:24 ` Just shoot me now Reiner Steib
2010-12-22 13:57 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 14:18 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 15:54 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-12-22 16:30 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 16:54 ` Richard Riley [this message]
2010-12-22 17:12 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:14 ` Lawrence Mitchell
2010-12-22 17:43 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 18:07 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:40 ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 19:25 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-22 7:26 ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Richard Riley
2010-12-22 9:35 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 12:53 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 18:21 ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-12-22 19:12 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:44 ` Adam Sjøgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0hlj3hwxxz.fsf@news.eternal-september.org \
--to=rileyrg@googlemail.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=tommy.kelly@verilab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).