Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren)
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:21:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tyi58y8i.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2hbe66kb0.fsf@verilab.com>

On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:53:07 -0600, Tommy wrote:

> So where does that leave us? 

It is much easier for a developer deep in the code to receive a
documentation patch, look at it, and say "Ok, that sounds fine,
applied", than it is to receieve a suggestion in words that something -
while technically correct - is slightly confusing to a (new) user.

(E.g. I agree that not escaping '.' in a regexp matching a domain is
confusing to a user who is trying to check his "world-view" by looking
at the examples, but it is also plain to see that it isn't wrong - and a
user thinking 'regular expressions' will recognize that (but then the
clue of "flawless" examples go down the drain)).

What I am trying to say is that I think you will find much less argument
if you dig out git and start supplying your suggestions for improvements
as patches to the manual.

It is quite natural to say "Meh, but it isn't wrong" if you're asking
someone to do... the horror... work!

Appreciating this type of feedback isn't always easy to do cheerfully,
sometimes it will be curmudgeonly.

> Either the user is thick, or the documentation is thick.

Or the user is trying to achieve to many things at once. There is a
learning curve, even if you aren't thick ;-)


  Best regards,

    Adam

-- 
 "Accept the mystery!"                                        Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk




  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-21 22:29 What's wrong with this fancy split? Tommy Kelly
2010-12-21 22:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-21 23:50   ` Russ Allbery
2010-12-22  0:17     ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  9:32     ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:16       ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:28         ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:35           ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:44             ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 11:44               ` Bjørn Mork
2010-12-22 12:26               ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 12:37                 ` Tassilo Horn
2010-12-22 12:59                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 13:48                     ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 16:10                       ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:46                         ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 18:19                           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:15                             ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 19:53                               ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:12                                 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 23:31                                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-23 19:05                                     ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 15:39               ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 12:34           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  0:13   ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  7:24     ` Just shoot me now Reiner Steib
2010-12-22 13:57       ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 14:18         ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 15:54           ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-12-22 16:30             ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 16:54               ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 17:12                 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:14                 ` Lawrence Mitchell
2010-12-22 17:43                   ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 18:07                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:40                   ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 19:25           ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-22  7:26     ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Richard Riley
2010-12-22  9:35     ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 12:53       ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 18:21         ` Adam Sjøgren [this message]
2010-12-22 19:12           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:44             ` Adam Sjøgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tyi58y8i.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk \
    --to=asjo@koldfront.dk \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).