Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:34:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2sjxq6l6p.fsf@verilab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m27hf22jav.fsf@igel.home>


In response to
>> Making [ and ] word characters for something like this, sounds like a
>> receipe for confusion.

Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Why?  

Because the original writer of "sounds like a recipe for confusion" is
understanding the reader where you Andreas, with respect, are not.

This is not about the code. It's about the people using the code. You
clearly get the former. Maybe not so much the latter when they are less
knowledgeable about this stuff than you.

> That's the whole point of nnmail-split-fancy-syntax-table.

If that's really the case. If the whole point of
nnmail-split-fancy-table is to ensure no confusion in this area, then
it's failing to achieve its point with what I'm guessing is a reasonable
subset of those who could suffer from said confusion.

But that's OK. That's what documentation is for :-)

Tommy








  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-21 22:29 Tommy Kelly
2010-12-21 22:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-21 23:50   ` Russ Allbery
2010-12-22  0:17     ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  9:32     ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:16       ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:28         ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 10:35           ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 10:44             ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 11:44               ` Bjørn Mork
2010-12-22 12:26               ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 12:37                 ` Tassilo Horn
2010-12-22 12:59                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 13:48                     ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 16:10                       ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:46                         ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 18:19                           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:15                             ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 19:53                               ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:12                                 ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 23:31                                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-23 19:05                                     ` Steinar Bang
2010-12-22 15:39               ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 12:34           ` Tommy Kelly [this message]
2010-12-22  0:13   ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22  7:24     ` Just shoot me now Reiner Steib
2010-12-22 13:57       ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 14:18         ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 15:54           ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2010-12-22 16:30             ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 16:54               ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 17:12                 ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 17:14                 ` Lawrence Mitchell
2010-12-22 17:43                   ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 18:07                   ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 22:40                   ` Richard Riley
2010-12-22 19:25           ` Eric S Fraga
2010-12-22  7:26     ` Just shoot me now (was Re: What's wrong with this fancy split?) Richard Riley
2010-12-22  9:35     ` Andreas Schwab
2010-12-22 12:53       ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 18:21         ` Adam Sjøgren
2010-12-22 19:12           ` Tommy Kelly
2010-12-22 19:44             ` Adam Sjøgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2sjxq6l6p.fsf@verilab.com \
    --to=tommy.kelly@verilab.com \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).