From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com>
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: forgotten versions
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:44:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn1sOmfBu6v1SQSh=xOCD8XOt54=kVdEt4aD2zB5houS8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1o1B_m348+owx7RmsxMwhKy-sqSPvacZtm5kAhBLvk7w@mail.gmail.com>
Another take on this is Mike Lesk's saying "its easy to occupy a
vacuum its harder to push something aside" said of UUCP.
v7 exploded into the world, and made BSD and SunOS happen.
v8 and 9 and 10 had to work harder to get mindshare because something
was already there.
things like rc were too "confrontational" to a mind attuned to bourne
shell. Sockets (which btw, totally SUCK PUS) were coded into things
and even (YECHH) made POSIX and IETF spec status. Streams didn't stand
a chance.
basically, v7 succeeded too well, for v8/9/10 to get mindshare. I
agree it sucks they aren't documented, its just wrong: Serious OS
history needs to look beyond the narrow path in view. I'd say anyone
who doesn't write about them at length hasn't done their homework.
-G
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:18 AM George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
>
> you're not wrong, but the other take on this is that the AT&T
> licensing and some other things tended to make the circle of people
> who could "see" this code significantly smaller than those feeding off
> Unix 32V/v7 -> BSD -> Solaris.
>
> this isn't meant to imply you did anything "wrong" -It was probably a
> huge distraction having randoms begging for a tape of v8/9/10 with low
> to no willingness to "give back"
>
> -G
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:06 AM Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Excited as I was to see this history of Unix code in a single repository:
> >
> > https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo
> >
> > it continues the long-standing tradition of ignoring all the work done at Bell Labs after v7. I consider v8 v9 v10 to be worth of attention, even influential, but to hear this list talk about it - or discussions just about anywhere else - you'd think they never existed. There are exceptions, but this site does reinforce the broadly known version of the story.
> >
> > It's doubly ironic for me because people often mistakenly credit me for working on Unix, but I landed at the Labs after v7 was long dispatched. At the Labs, I first worked on what became v8.
> >
> > I suppose it's because the history flowed as this site shows, with BSD being the driving force for a number of reasons, but it feels to me that a large piece of Unix history has been sidelined.
> >
> > I know it's a whiny lament, but those neglected systems had interesting advances.
> >
> > -rob
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 23:06 [TUHS] " Rob Pike
2022-06-16 23:17 ` [TUHS] " Earl Baugh
2022-06-16 23:18 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-16 23:44 ` George Michaelson [this message]
2022-06-17 0:10 ` Larry McVoy
2022-06-17 16:23 ` [TUHS] Sockets vs Streams (was " Bakul Shah
2022-06-17 17:43 ` [TUHS] " Paul Winalski
2022-06-17 22:52 ` Dan Stromberg
2022-06-17 7:20 ` [TUHS] " Diomidis Spinellis
2022-06-17 7:33 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-17 8:34 ` arnold
2022-06-17 10:52 ` arnold
2022-06-18 7:05 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 7:50 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-19 8:17 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 8:53 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-19 9:02 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 9:14 ` arnold
2022-06-19 9:19 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2022-06-19 9:23 ` arnold
2022-06-19 11:37 ` Matthias Bruestle
2022-06-19 14:47 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2022-06-19 16:27 ` Al Kossow
2022-06-19 18:32 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-06-19 18:38 ` Dan Cross
2022-06-21 23:56 ` Jacob Moody
2022-06-22 0:13 ` Larry McVoy
2022-06-22 0:48 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-22 1:55 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-22 2:10 ` Bakul Shah
2022-06-22 2:14 ` Jon Steinhart
2022-06-22 2:19 ` Andrew Hume
2022-06-22 2:58 ` Rob Pike
2022-06-22 3:09 ` George Michaelson
2022-06-22 2:16 ` Andrew Hume
2022-06-22 2:55 ` Brad Spencer
2022-06-17 14:50 Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-18 0:35 Douglas McIlroy
2022-06-18 5:00 ` Kevin Bowling
2022-06-18 5:13 ` Adam Thornton
2022-06-18 16:58 ` Clem Cole
2022-06-18 17:18 ` Warner Losh
2022-06-18 17:57 ` Clem Cole
2022-06-18 19:55 Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-22 12:06 Noel Chiappa
2022-06-23 0:02 ` Dan Cross
2022-06-23 2:18 Noel Chiappa
2022-06-24 6:47 Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-25 19:16 ` Anthony Martin
2022-06-25 20:45 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2022-06-27 0:57 ` Kevin Bowling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKr6gn1sOmfBu6v1SQSh=xOCD8XOt54=kVdEt4aD2zB5houS8A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ggm@algebras.org \
--cc=robpike@gmail.com \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).