From: Bakul Shah <bakul+plan9@bitblocks.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:19:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110202191924.5AD2E5B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:45:56 PST." <AANLkTinC85b1ViX9RNPZwzLCWt3_kEaVgYNx7cJR52sK@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:45:56 PST David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well if I were funded and had an infinite amount of time I'd think LLVM for
> Plan 9 would be excellent, as well as Go on LLVM :-).
llvm port would need c++.
$ size /usr/local/bin/clang
text data bss dec hex filename
22842862 1023204 69200 23935266 16d3922 /usr/local/bin/clang
1.2+ Million LOC in **/*.cpp **/*.h (though this includes
tests etc.) Even gcc is smaller now!
It boggles my mind they chose C++ instead of one of Scheme,
Ocaml, Haskell or CL.
Then there is libfirm (in C) which uses Cliff Click's ideas
of a low level graph based intermediate representation.
Seemed quite promising when I looked at it (a couple of years
ago). It is much smaller than llvm (where they can be
compared). But looks like most of funding oxygen has been
going to llvm.
http://pp.info.uni-karlsruhe.de/firm/Main_Page
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 6:56 Jacob Todd
2011-02-02 7:06 ` ron minnich
2011-02-02 7:25 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-02 7:25 ` Lucio De Re
2011-02-02 7:35 ` Nick LaForge
2011-02-02 17:45 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 19:19 ` Bakul Shah [this message]
2011-02-03 0:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 0:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 0:52 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 0:50 ` ron minnich
2011-02-03 2:16 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 2:25 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-03 2:26 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 15:08 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-03 16:19 ` Eugene Gorodinsky
2011-02-03 17:41 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 18:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 18:33 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 18:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 19:40 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 20:33 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-04 7:16 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-04 14:38 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 18:29 ` Joseph Stewart
2011-02-03 8:35 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 8:56 ` EBo
2011-02-03 9:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 9:47 ` EBo
2011-02-03 9:50 ` Lucio De Re
2011-02-03 10:38 ` C H Forsyth
2011-02-03 12:07 ` EBo
2011-02-03 20:49 ` Federico G. Benavento
2011-02-03 21:07 ` ron minnich
2011-02-03 21:32 ` Steve Simon
2011-02-03 23:19 ` EBo
2011-02-03 18:21 ` smiley
2011-02-03 18:50 ` John Floren
2011-02-03 19:09 ` [9fans] FORTRAN and tools [was: Modern development language for Plan 9 EBo
2011-02-03 23:08 ` John Stalker
2011-02-03 23:12 ` EBo
2011-02-05 19:54 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-02-05 20:32 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2011-02-05 21:17 ` EBo
2011-02-05 21:49 ` ron minnich
2011-02-05 23:12 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2011-02-06 0:25 ` EBo
2011-02-04 5:54 ` [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely andrey mirtchovski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31 22:12 [9fans] " Steve Simon
2011-02-01 6:02 ` smiley
2011-02-01 6:45 ` ron minnich
2011-02-01 17:51 ` smiley
2011-02-01 18:33 ` ron minnich
2011-02-02 0:28 ` smiley
2011-02-02 0:47 ` ron minnich
2011-02-02 5:14 ` [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: " smiley
2011-02-02 5:37 ` Scott Sullivan
2011-02-02 5:38 ` EBo
2011-02-02 15:54 ` Anthony Sorace
2011-02-02 12:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 13:48 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-02 17:47 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 17:53 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:07 ` tlaronde
2011-02-02 18:26 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 18:48 ` tlaronde
2011-02-02 19:26 ` Nick LaForge
2011-02-03 0:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-02 17:44 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 17:50 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:15 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 18:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:36 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 18:38 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:46 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 19:15 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 19:31 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 19:48 ` Jeff Sickel
2011-02-02 20:07 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 20:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 20:22 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 18:21 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 18:03 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:30 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-18 5:23 ` ron minnich
2011-02-18 5:34 ` Paul Lalonde
2011-02-18 13:29 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 13:45 ` dexen deVries
2011-02-18 14:54 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-18 15:15 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 16:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 16:28 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 16:49 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:10 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 17:32 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:44 ` ron minnich
2011-02-18 19:28 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 19:33 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 19:49 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 18:43 ` Joseph Stewart
2011-02-18 17:05 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-02-18 17:12 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 16:53 ` dexen deVries
2011-02-18 16:59 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 17:07 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:11 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 17:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:52 ` John Floren
2011-02-18 18:46 ` Rob Pike
2011-02-18 19:15 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-18 19:26 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 19:46 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-18 20:15 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 21:06 ` John Floren
2011-02-18 22:21 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-19 10:26 ` Steve Simon
2011-02-19 15:09 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-19 20:09 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-19 21:15 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-20 23:49 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-21 14:47 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-19 16:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-02-19 15:36 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 19:35 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-18 20:10 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-18 21:03 ` ron minnich
2011-02-18 23:55 ` Federico G. Benavento
2011-02-18 19:15 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-21 5:08 ` smiley
2011-02-18 17:16 ` Russ Cox
2011-02-18 17:12 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-02-19 10:34 ` Steve Simon
2011-02-19 17:25 ` dexen deVries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110202191924.5AD2E5B3B@mail.bitblocks.com \
--to=bakul+plan9@bitblocks.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).