From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:08:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNGX8mK6tLzoSCBj-k0ZVrgNiAHSB4O_aCc5Bj@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c48b8397b29ededd862efa6de0baf70@brasstown.quanstro.net>
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> It is a C/C++/Obj-C compiler & does static analysis, has
>> backends for multiple processor types as well as C as a
>> target, a lot of optimization tricks etc. See llvm.org. But
>> frankly, I think they have lost the plot. C is basically a
>> portable assembly programming language & in my highly biased
>> opinion a C compiler should do no more than peephole
>> optimizations. If you want more, might as well use a high
>> level language.
>
> preach it, brother. i couldn't agree more.
>
> - erik
>
>
Well LLVM uses its internal ASTs for a lot of the optimizations doesnt
it? My understanding is LLVM is a stack of software that you compose
other programming language tools by including the libraries you want.
One might be able to remove the optimizing behaviors one doesn't want
pretty easily, or write one's own optimizing layer that's stripped
down. Then one could have the "do what I said" compiler instead of
the "do what you think I meant" one.
I believe there are occasions for each type of compiler really.
It might seem really big and bloated but I still think what they've
done is kind of neat. Making a real compiler in Haskell or O'Caml is
pretty damned easy with LLVM bindings.
I wonder how difficult it is to target Plan 9 with LLVM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 6:56 Jacob Todd
2011-02-02 7:06 ` ron minnich
2011-02-02 7:25 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-02 7:25 ` Lucio De Re
2011-02-02 7:35 ` Nick LaForge
2011-02-02 17:45 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 19:19 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 0:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 0:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 0:52 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 0:50 ` ron minnich
2011-02-03 2:16 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 2:25 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-03 2:26 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 15:08 ` David Leimbach [this message]
2011-02-03 16:19 ` Eugene Gorodinsky
2011-02-03 17:41 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 18:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 18:33 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 18:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 19:40 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-03 20:33 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-04 7:16 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-04 14:38 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-03 18:29 ` Joseph Stewart
2011-02-03 8:35 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 8:56 ` EBo
2011-02-03 9:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-03 9:47 ` EBo
2011-02-03 9:50 ` Lucio De Re
2011-02-03 10:38 ` C H Forsyth
2011-02-03 12:07 ` EBo
2011-02-03 20:49 ` Federico G. Benavento
2011-02-03 21:07 ` ron minnich
2011-02-03 21:32 ` Steve Simon
2011-02-03 23:19 ` EBo
2011-02-03 18:21 ` smiley
2011-02-03 18:50 ` John Floren
2011-02-03 19:09 ` [9fans] FORTRAN and tools [was: Modern development language for Plan 9 EBo
2011-02-03 23:08 ` John Stalker
2011-02-03 23:12 ` EBo
2011-02-05 19:54 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2011-02-05 20:32 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2011-02-05 21:17 ` EBo
2011-02-05 21:49 ` ron minnich
2011-02-05 23:12 ` Benjamin Huntsman
2011-02-06 0:25 ` EBo
2011-02-04 5:54 ` [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely andrey mirtchovski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31 22:12 [9fans] " Steve Simon
2011-02-01 6:02 ` smiley
2011-02-01 6:45 ` ron minnich
2011-02-01 17:51 ` smiley
2011-02-01 18:33 ` ron minnich
2011-02-02 0:28 ` smiley
2011-02-02 0:47 ` ron minnich
2011-02-02 5:14 ` [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9, WAS: " smiley
2011-02-02 5:37 ` Scott Sullivan
2011-02-02 5:38 ` EBo
2011-02-02 15:54 ` Anthony Sorace
2011-02-02 12:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 13:48 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-02 17:47 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 17:53 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:07 ` tlaronde
2011-02-02 18:26 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 18:48 ` tlaronde
2011-02-02 19:26 ` Nick LaForge
2011-02-03 0:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-02-02 17:44 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 17:50 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:15 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 18:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:36 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 18:38 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:46 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 19:15 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 19:31 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 19:48 ` Jeff Sickel
2011-02-02 20:07 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 20:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 20:22 ` Jonathan Cast
2011-02-02 18:21 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-02 18:03 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-02 18:30 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-18 5:23 ` ron minnich
2011-02-18 5:34 ` Paul Lalonde
2011-02-18 13:29 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 13:45 ` dexen deVries
2011-02-18 14:54 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-18 15:15 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 16:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 16:28 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 16:49 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:10 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 17:32 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:44 ` ron minnich
2011-02-18 19:28 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 19:33 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 19:49 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 18:43 ` Joseph Stewart
2011-02-18 17:05 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-02-18 17:12 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 16:53 ` dexen deVries
2011-02-18 16:59 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 17:07 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:11 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-18 17:21 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 17:52 ` John Floren
2011-02-18 18:46 ` Rob Pike
2011-02-18 19:15 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-18 19:26 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 19:46 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-18 20:15 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 21:06 ` John Floren
2011-02-18 22:21 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-19 10:26 ` Steve Simon
2011-02-19 15:09 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-19 20:09 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-19 21:15 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-20 23:49 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-21 14:47 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-19 16:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-02-19 15:36 ` erik quanstrom
2011-02-18 19:35 ` David Leimbach
2011-02-18 20:10 ` Bakul Shah
2011-02-18 21:03 ` ron minnich
2011-02-18 23:55 ` Federico G. Benavento
2011-02-18 19:15 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2011-02-21 5:08 ` smiley
2011-02-18 17:16 ` Russ Cox
2011-02-18 17:12 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-02-19 10:34 ` Steve Simon
2011-02-19 17:25 ` dexen deVries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikNGX8mK6tLzoSCBj-k0ZVrgNiAHSB4O_aCc5Bj@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).