* [9fans] sources down? @ 2015-08-24 16:42 KADOTA Kyohei 2015-08-24 17:02 ` stevie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: KADOTA Kyohei @ 2015-08-24 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Hello fans. currently, is sources.cs.bell-labs.com down? on my plan9 box: % ndb/dnsquery > sources.cs.bell-labs.com !dns: dns failure > plan9.bell-labs.com plan9.bell-labs.com ip 135.104.24.16 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2015-08-24 16:42 [9fans] sources down? KADOTA Kyohei @ 2015-08-24 17:02 ` stevie 2015-08-24 18:04 ` KADOTA Kyohei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: stevie @ 2015-08-24 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > Hello fans. > > currently, is sources.cs.bell-labs.com down? > > on my plan9 box: > > % ndb/dnsquery >> sources.cs.bell-labs.com > !dns: dns failure >> plan9.bell-labs.com > plan9.bell-labs.com ip 135.104.24.16 Sources is up again, but it was down for a few hours, I think. > sources.cs.bell-labs.com sources.cs.bell-labs.com ip 135.104.24.18 Stevie ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2015-08-24 17:02 ` stevie @ 2015-08-24 18:04 ` KADOTA Kyohei 0 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: KADOTA Kyohei @ 2015-08-24 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Thanks stevie. My plan9 box resolved sources.cs.bell-labs.com too. >> Hello fans. >> >> currently, is sources.cs.bell-labs.com down? >> >> on my plan9 box: >> >> % ndb/dnsquery >>> sources.cs.bell-labs.com >> !dns: dns failure >>> plan9.bell-labs.com >> plan9.bell-labs.com ip 135.104.24.16 > > Sources is up again, but it was down for a few hours, I think. > >> sources.cs.bell-labs.com > sources.cs.bell-labs.com ip 135.104.24.18 > > Stevie > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* [9fans] sources down? @ 2009-05-22 16:34 Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich 2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro 0 siblings, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Hello when I try '9fs sources' I get a timeout establishing connection... (all day today) I guess it's not my problem, or is it? Thanks Ruda (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 16:34 Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich 2009-05-22 17:12 ` erik quanstrom ` (2 more replies) 2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro 1 sibling, 3 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: ron minnich @ 2009-05-22 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: > (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) warning: complaining about something you get for free is counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help in some way. ron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich @ 2009-05-22 17:12 ` erik quanstrom 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 21:05 ` Uriel 2 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: erik quanstrom @ 2009-05-22 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: > > > (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) > > warning: complaining about something you get for free is > counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help > in some way. > > ron there's web-only access at http://sources.coraid.com. - erik ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich 2009-05-22 17:12 ` erik quanstrom @ 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dave.l ` (2 more replies) 2009-05-22 21:05 ` Uriel 2 siblings, 3 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs >> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) > > warning: complaining about something you get for free is > counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help > in some way. > > ron well, maybe. Maybe not. In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens, first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody saying: 'hey guys, we have this and this problem that causes the sources are down every now and then.' Yet we see it happening. You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free). It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable. When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing. Ruda ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dave.l 2009-05-22 21:15 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:09 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:31 ` ron minnich 2 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: dave.l @ 2009-05-22 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free). > It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable. > When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing. Firstly if sources goes down, no-one dies so it's not a big deal. Secondly, given the choice between "a bit unreliable but very cool" and "very reliable but totally shit", I know which I will take. D ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dave.l @ 2009-05-22 21:15 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 22:13 ` Noah Evans 2009-05-22 22:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 0 siblings, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Uriel @ 2009-05-22 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Something that is totally unreliable, no matter how cool, is not very useful. And I think anyone that has limited time, and who wants to get something done, will pick "very reliable but totally shit" over "very unreliable but very cool" every single time. Also there is little reason for Plan 9 servers to be unreliable, others with very little resources have managed to run public Plan 9 servers in their spare time that have proved to be much more reliable than sources. Peace uriel On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM, <dave.l@mac.com> wrote: >> You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free). >> It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable. >> When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing. > > Firstly if sources goes down, no-one dies so it's not a big deal. > > Secondly, given the choice between "a bit unreliable but very cool" > and "very reliable but totally shit", I know which I will take. > > D ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 21:15 ` Uriel @ 2009-05-22 22:13 ` Noah Evans 2009-05-22 22:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Noah Evans @ 2009-05-22 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Uriel here's an honest question, would you stop complaining if you had your own account on the murray hill version of plan9 will full access to the venti? You'd also have the freedom to do whatever you want with it. Yes or no. On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote: > Something that is totally unreliable, no matter how cool, is not very useful. > > And I think anyone that has limited time, and who wants to get > something done, will pick "very reliable but totally shit" over "very > unreliable but very cool" every single time. > > Also there is little reason for Plan 9 servers to be unreliable, > others with very little resources have managed to run public Plan 9 > servers in their spare time that have proved to be much more reliable > than sources. > > Peace > > uriel > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:52 PM, <dave.l@mac.com> wrote: >>> You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free). >>> It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable. >>> When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing. >> >> Firstly if sources goes down, no-one dies so it's not a big deal. >> >> Secondly, given the choice between "a bit unreliable but very cool" >> and "very reliable but totally shit", I know which I will take. >> >> D > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 21:15 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 22:13 ` Noah Evans @ 2009-05-22 22:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-22 23:06 ` Rudolf Sykora 1 sibling, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Eric Van Hensbergen @ 2009-05-22 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote: > Something that is totally unreliable, no matter how cool, is not very useful. > > And I think anyone that has limited time, and who wants to get > something done, will pick "very reliable but totally shit" over "very > unreliable but very cool" every single time. > While not having direct knowledge of what caused the current outage, I can say that such outages are rarely caused by Plan 9 or the hardware on which its running. You see, right now, the Plan 9 machine room (and the doom room, and much of the offices/lab space around it) are being repurposed. There are exactly (I think exactly) two people who turn the lights back on every time something like this happens, and they get no accolades from the company for providing this free service to the community -- in fact, their life would be significantly better if they just left the lights off. So please, keep antagonizing them so that they shut this nice free service down -- you'll make their lives considerably more simple and they can get back to doing real work. As ron said, verifying that sources is down on the list (or IRC or whatever) and then sending a polite note to geoff and/or jmk to let them know is fine (since they use this infrastructure as their primary work environment, these problems often cause them more pain than us). Anything beyond that is ridiculous. Also as Ron said, a far more constructive approach is mirroring (which many already do), and an even better idea would be for someone to code up a nice little layer that directs your sources request to the closest available server. -eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 22:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen @ 2009-05-22 23:06 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 23:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > While not having direct knowledge of what caused the current outage, I > can say that such outages are rarely caused by Plan 9 or the hardware > on which its running. Ok. So what caused the other outrages in the recent past? (I may give at least one other date, on which I even asked the same question to the list; according to you this situation is very rare, according to what I have lived through it happens annoyingly often.) > You see, right now, the Plan 9 machine room > (and the doom room, and much of the offices/lab space around it) are > being repurposed. There are exactly (I think exactly) two people who > turn the lights back on every time something like this happens, and > they get no accolades from the company for providing this free service > to the community -- in fact, their life would be significantly better > if they just left the lights off. So please, keep antagonizing them > so that they shut this nice free service down -- you'll make their > lives considerably more simple and they can get back to doing real > work. First, I am grateful, somebody once designed plan 9. It is a well crafted system. Second, if the system is to be hosted as it is now, it is a shame. Make statistics. I don't care who helps, as long as it doesn't work. > As ron said, verifying that sources is down on the list (or IRC or > whatever) and then sending a polite note to geoff and/or jmk to let > them know is fine (since they use this infrastructure as their primary > work environment, these problems often cause them more pain than us). I do not know who takes care of the sources. I do not know even there is somebody called geoff. Thus writing that we should appeal to him is a nonsense. Moreover, there is not that many posts here, nobody gets hurt if one writes 'sources are down' here. If it were true and it all worked as it should, you wouldn't have here anything, by the way. Writing to the list also documents that something is wrong. And that's a good thing. > Anything beyond that is ridiculous. Also as Ron said, a far more > constructive approach is mirroring (which many already do), and an > even better idea would be for someone to code up a nice little layer > that directs your sources request to the closest available server. So is there a need, suddenly? Isn't it good to discuss it here? What about saying, hey we need it. Who can do it? I guessed this mailing list IS the right place. I am a physicist. I can recognize I like the system in a way. I can't do much about it yet. It's enough for me, that I must struggle with topics like: I need python, there seem too many of them somehow, how should I install it, which one? what is necessary?, why hasn't somebody write a few lines about it?, oh I can't use ssh2, oh probably usb won't work, oh, let's forget about wireless... Encountering problems even when downloading sources is just getting to the breaking point to say: that's enough, let's just stick to something that has some problems, but works somehow (bsd, linux, whatever...; or plan9port, glendix). And that's a pity, because although one knows he would like to follow some way, he is forced to follow a different one. R ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 23:06 ` Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 23:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-22 23:54 ` Francisco J Ballesteros 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Eric Van Hensbergen @ 2009-05-22 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: >> While not having direct knowledge of what caused the current outage, I >> can say that such outages are rarely caused by Plan 9 or the hardware >> on which its running. > > Ok. So what caused the other outrages in the recent past? > (I may give at least one other date, on which I even asked the same > question to the list; according to you this situation is very rare, > according to what I have lived through it happens annoyingly often.) > Again, I'm not there, but to give a bit of insight, they have been in the process of tearing up the machine room and moving the lab around. This means unplugging and moving equipment, moving network equipment, and so forth. The external link to the labs is a "special case" link which means it probably isn't managed with the rest of the enterprise network. The sources resource is a (probably relatively expensive) "public service", which has to be argued for and justified with a larger company that could care less and has been in financial crisis since I left several years ago. It has two people that look after it, who have real jobs outside of caring for the "public service", and they have real lives too. So there is no 24/7 support staff, and the environment surrounding these machines is currently in major flux. >> As ron said, verifying that sources is down on the list (or IRC or >> whatever) and then sending a polite note to geoff and/or jmk to let >> them know is fine (since they use this infrastructure as their primary >> work environment, these problems often cause them more pain than us). > > I do not know who takes care of the sources. I do not know even there > is somebody called geoff. Thus writing that we should appeal to him is > a nonsense. Moreover, there is not that many posts here, nobody gets > hurt if one writes 'sources are down' here. If it were true and it all > worked as it should, you wouldn't have here anything, by the way. > Writing to the list also documents that something is wrong. And that's > a good thing. > As I said, confirming that sources is down on the list is fine. Asking who to contact when this happens is fine. AFAIK, Geoff and jmk read the list and so posting that you are having trouble reaching sources is sufficient. Posting antagonizing commentary: >>>>I guess it's not my problem, or is it? >>>>(why does this happen SO OFTEN?) is not productive, it just alienates those who have put their careers at risk to support the community. >> Anything beyond that is ridiculous. Also as Ron said, a far more >> constructive approach is mirroring (which many already do), and an >> even better idea would be for someone to code up a nice little layer >> that directs your sources request to the closest available server. > > So is there a need, suddenly? Isn't it good to discuss it here? What > about saying, hey we need it. Who can do it? I guessed this mailing > list IS the right place. > The point being made is that if you see a need, please do it. Post the solution. That's productive. If you are not sure how to do it, ask for pointers. If you are unable to provide a solution, ask if there are mirrors. Asking for someone else to solve the problem for you is not productive. There is no one paid to solve problems for the community, we are all volunteers as far as that is concerned. The population of the labs has been reduced dramatically. We, as a community, need to step up and be self-sufficient, or die. -eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 23:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen @ 2009-05-22 23:54 ` Francisco J Ballesteros 2009-05-23 2:28 ` Anant Narayanan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Francisco J Ballesteros @ 2009-05-22 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs sources.lsub.org is avaiable just by using 9fs. But it's probably better to wait for the real thing. There are also several other mirrors IIRC that have been posted to this list. On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: >>> While not having direct knowledge of what caused the current outage, I >>> can say that such outages are rarely caused by Plan 9 or the hardware >>> on which its running. >> >> Ok. So what caused the other outrages in the recent past? >> (I may give at least one other date, on which I even asked the same >> question to the list; according to you this situation is very rare, >> according to what I have lived through it happens annoyingly often.) >> > > Again, I'm not there, but to give a bit of insight, they have been in > the process of tearing up the machine room and moving the lab around. > This means unplugging and moving equipment, moving network equipment, > and so forth. The external link to the labs is a "special case" link > which means it probably isn't managed with the rest of the enterprise > network. The sources resource is a (probably relatively expensive) > "public service", which has to be argued for and justified with a > larger company that could care less and has been in financial crisis > since I left several years ago. It has two people that look after it, > who have real jobs outside of caring for the "public service", and > they have real lives too. So there is no 24/7 support staff, and the > environment surrounding these machines is currently in major flux. > >>> As ron said, verifying that sources is down on the list (or IRC or >>> whatever) and then sending a polite note to geoff and/or jmk to let >>> them know is fine (since they use this infrastructure as their primary >>> work environment, these problems often cause them more pain than us). >> >> I do not know who takes care of the sources. I do not know even there >> is somebody called geoff. Thus writing that we should appeal to him is >> a nonsense. Moreover, there is not that many posts here, nobody gets >> hurt if one writes 'sources are down' here. If it were true and it all >> worked as it should, you wouldn't have here anything, by the way. >> Writing to the list also documents that something is wrong. And that's >> a good thing. >> > > As I said, confirming that sources is down on the list is fine. > Asking who to contact when this happens is fine. AFAIK, Geoff and jmk > read the list and so posting that you are having trouble reaching > sources is sufficient. Posting antagonizing commentary: > >>>>>I guess it's not my problem, or is it? >>>>>(why does this happen SO OFTEN?) > > is not productive, it just alienates those who have put their careers > at risk to support the community. > >>> Anything beyond that is ridiculous. Also as Ron said, a far more >>> constructive approach is mirroring (which many already do), and an >>> even better idea would be for someone to code up a nice little layer >>> that directs your sources request to the closest available server. >> >> So is there a need, suddenly? Isn't it good to discuss it here? What >> about saying, hey we need it. Who can do it? I guessed this mailing >> list IS the right place. >> > > The point being made is that if you see a need, please do it. Post > the solution. That's productive. If you are not sure how to do it, > ask for pointers. If you are unable to provide a solution, ask if > there are mirrors. Asking for someone else to solve the problem for > you is not productive. There is no one paid to solve problems for the > community, we are all volunteers as far as that is concerned. The > population of the labs has been reduced dramatically. We, as a > community, need to step up and be self-sufficient, or die. > > -eric > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 23:54 ` Francisco J Ballesteros @ 2009-05-23 2:28 ` Anant Narayanan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Anant Narayanan @ 2009-05-23 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On 23-May-09, at 1:54 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > sources.lsub.org is avaiable just by using 9fs. > But it's probably better to wait for the real thing. > > There are also several other mirrors IIRC that have been posted to > this list. % 9fs kix.in /n/sources -- Anant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dave.l @ 2009-05-22 21:09 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:31 ` ron minnich 2 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Uriel @ 2009-05-22 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: >>> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) >> >> warning: complaining about something you get for free is >> counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help >> in some way. >> >> ron > > well, maybe. Maybe not. > > In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens, > first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources > works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody > saying: 'hey guys, we have this and this problem that causes the > sources are down every now and then.' Yet we see it happening. Don't try to apply logic to this, it doesn't work. Anyone that dears question how things are done should be treated with contempt, and if you are not hired by some big organization to work on Plan 9 then your opinion is worth nothing. > You may think it's a question of money (you mentioned it is for free). > It's not. There are many projects out, totally for free, but reliable. > When I do something it must be reliable, or it's worth criticizing. Except that Plan 9 clearly wants no users and no developers, so reliability is to be avoided, or it might attract some interest from people that might help, and that would be bad. Peace uriel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dave.l 2009-05-22 21:09 ` Uriel @ 2009-05-22 21:31 ` ron minnich 2009-05-22 21:43 ` Uriel 2 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: ron minnich @ 2009-05-22 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: > In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens, > first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources > works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody > saying: 'hey guys, we have this and this problem that causes the > sources are down every now and then.' Yet we see it happening. OK, so let's try again. How about this: instead of blasting a note to the known universe, 99.999% of which can't do anything about the situation, one could do the following: send a polite, discreet note to the people who actually run sources, something like this: "I would like to offer to help with making sources easily and readily available to the net. I've noticed that, at times, sources is not accessible. Is there some way in which I can help, by, e.g., running a replicated server?" Does this latter approach work? Yes, I have seen it work. It's why we have an improving USB stack. Does the former approach fail? Yes. It has driven some important people from this list. Antisocial behavior has negative consequences. Whining to the list is just, well, ... whining to the list. It ends up looking like an attempt to coerce people by shaming them in a public situation. It's what my kids used to do when they could not get their favorite dessert in the store. It doesn't make anyone feel any better. It's why so many people have Uriel in their kill files. A quiet offer of help to the maintainers is a lot nicer and more likely to actually get somewhere. thanks ron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 21:31 ` ron minnich @ 2009-05-22 21:43 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 22:59 ` Latchesar Ionkov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Uriel @ 2009-05-22 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: > >> In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens, >> first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources >> works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody >> saying: 'hey guys, we have this and this problem that causes the >> sources are down every now and then.' Yet we see it happening. > > > OK, so let's try again. How about this: > instead of blasting a note to the known universe, 99.999% of which > can't do anything about the situation, one could do the following: > > send a polite, discreet note to the people who actually run sources, > something like this: > "I would like to offer to help with making sources easily and readily > available to the net. I've noticed that, at times, sources is not > accessible. Is there some way in which I can help, by, e.g., running > a replicated server?" > > Does this latter approach work? Yes, I have seen it work. It's why we > have an improving USB stack. What improving USB stack? Ah, so doing everything in secret is the way to go? I wonder why don't we just shut down 9fans, open discussion and collaboration is certainly not something anyone wants here anyway. > > Does the former approach fail? Yes. It has driven some important > people from this list. Antisocial behavior has negative consequences. The only antisocial behavior here (besides mine, obviously) was your condescending and insulting answer to somebody that just asked an honest question, and the insinuation that he wasn't ready to help, when you just admitted "99.999%" of the people can't do anything about the situation, in great part because people that want to help are made to feel they are unwelcome by comments like yours. > Whining to the list is just, well, ... whining to the list. It ends > up looking like an attempt to coerce people by shaming them in a > public situation. It's what my kids used to do when they could not get > their favorite dessert in the store. It doesn't make anyone feel any > better. It's why so many people have Uriel in their kill files. It makes people aware of a problem that many keep denying and demeaning. If people can't deal with reality, there are always kill files, as you point out. uriel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 21:43 ` Uriel @ 2009-05-22 22:59 ` Latchesar Ionkov 0 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Latchesar Ionkov @ 2009-05-22 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs The reality is that the sources outages rarely cause any _real_ problems. I wasn't able to access it few days ago, and instead of bothering geoff or jim, I just waited few hours. The server came up and I got what I needed. Lucho On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:31 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> In order I be of any help I need to know why the hell this happens, >>> first. I know next to nothing about how the whole system of sources >>> works, still I can help if I know how. But I do not remember anybody >>> saying: 'hey guys, we have this and this problem that causes the >>> sources are down every now and then.' Yet we see it happening. >> >> >> OK, so let's try again. How about this: >> instead of blasting a note to the known universe, 99.999% of which >> can't do anything about the situation, one could do the following: >> >> send a polite, discreet note to the people who actually run sources, >> something like this: >> "I would like to offer to help with making sources easily and readily >> available to the net. I've noticed that, at times, sources is not >> accessible. Is there some way in which I can help, by, e.g., running >> a replicated server?" >> >> Does this latter approach work? Yes, I have seen it work. It's why we >> have an improving USB stack. > > What improving USB stack? Ah, so doing everything in secret is the way > to go? I wonder why don't we just shut down 9fans, open discussion and > collaboration is certainly not something anyone wants here anyway. > >> >> Does the former approach fail? Yes. It has driven some important >> people from this list. Antisocial behavior has negative consequences. > > The only antisocial behavior here (besides mine, obviously) was your > condescending and insulting answer to somebody that just asked an > honest question, and the insinuation that he wasn't ready to help, > when you just admitted "99.999%" of the people can't do anything about > the situation, in great part because people that want to help are made > to feel they are unwelcome by comments like yours. > > >> Whining to the list is just, well, ... whining to the list. It ends >> up looking like an attempt to coerce people by shaming them in a >> public situation. It's what my kids used to do when they could not get >> their favorite dessert in the store. It doesn't make anyone feel any >> better. It's why so many people have Uriel in their kill files. > > It makes people aware of a problem that many keep denying and > demeaning. If people can't deal with reality, there are always kill > files, as you point out. > > uriel > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich 2009-05-22 17:12 ` erik quanstrom 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-22 21:05 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:13 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-23 3:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian 2 siblings, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Uriel @ 2009-05-22 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Warning, posting gratuitous obnoxious condescending comments is counter-productive. Complaining about things on the other hand, it is helpful, specially when certain people insist in being in denial of certain problems. Also note that many people have offered to help, and help is clearly not welcome. If you expect people to contribute to Plan 9 on their copious spare time while they are being treated with this kind of contempt, good luck to you, you are going to need it. Thank you uriel On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:51 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote: > >> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) > > warning: complaining about something you get for free is > counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help > in some way. > > ron > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 21:05 ` Uriel @ 2009-05-22 21:13 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-23 3:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Eric Van Hensbergen @ 2009-05-22 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs Okay Noah, you've been tee'd up. See how easy that was? -Eric Sent from my iPhone On May 22, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote: > Warning, posting gratuitous obnoxious condescending comments is > counter-productive. > > Complaining about things on the other hand, it is helpful, specially > when certain people insist in being in denial of certain problems. > > Also note that many people have offered to help, and help is clearly > not welcome. > > If you expect people to contribute to Plan 9 on their copious spare > time while they are being treated with this kind of contempt, good > luck to you, you are going to need it. > > Thank you > > uriel > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:51 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> (why does this happen SO OFTEN?) >> >> warning: complaining about something you get for free is >> counter-productive. Unless, of course, you are also offering to help >> in some way. >> >> ron >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 21:05 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:13 ` Eric Van Hensbergen @ 2009-05-23 3:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Skip Tavakkolian @ 2009-05-23 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/7cda8e292be895a5/ec8ea0a9abbc8a69?lnk=gst&q=rob+pike+weekend#ec8ea0a9abbc8a69 well, maybe not so quiet. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-22 16:34 Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich @ 2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro 2009-05-24 0:17 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 1:26 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 1 sibling, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: J.R. Mauro @ 2009-05-23 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs scripts. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro @ 2009-05-24 0:17 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 0:28 ` Anant Narayanan 2009-05-24 1:59 ` J.R. Mauro 2009-05-24 1:26 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 1 sibling, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: ron minnich @ 2009-05-24 0:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, J.R. Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote: > There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down > AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs > scripts. > > would be interesting to have a server that provided reliability by using whatever mirrors are out there and falling over transparently as things failed. ron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 0:17 ` ron minnich @ 2009-05-24 0:28 ` Anant Narayanan 2009-05-24 0:31 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 1:59 ` J.R. Mauro 1 sibling, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Anant Narayanan @ 2009-05-24 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On 24-May-09, at 2:17 AM, ron minnich wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, J.R. Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote: >> There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down >> AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs >> scripts. > would be interesting to have a server that provided reliability by > using whatever mirrors are out there and falling over transparently as > things failed. This approach relies on said server being up all the time. Much easier to fix client-side 9fs scripts :) -- Anant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 0:28 ` Anant Narayanan @ 2009-05-24 0:31 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 23:27 ` David Leimbach 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: ron minnich @ 2009-05-24 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Anant Narayanan <anant@kix.in> wrote: > On 24-May-09, at 2:17 AM, ron minnich wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, J.R. Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down >>> AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs >>> scripts. >> >> would be interesting to have a server that provided reliability by >> using whatever mirrors are out there and falling over transparently as >> things failed. > > This approach relies on said server being up all the time. Much easier to > fix client-side 9fs scripts :) Sorry, by "server" I did not mean "a server machine" I meant "a 9p server program which you could run" ron ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 0:31 ` ron minnich @ 2009-05-24 23:27 ` David Leimbach 2009-05-24 23:38 ` jt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: David Leimbach @ 2009-05-24 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1229 bytes --] On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:31 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Anant Narayanan <anant@kix.in> wrote: > > On 24-May-09, at 2:17 AM, ron minnich wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, J.R. Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down > >>> AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs > >>> scripts. > >> > >> would be interesting to have a server that provided reliability by > >> using whatever mirrors are out there and falling over transparently as > >> things failed. > > > > This approach relies on said server being up all the time. Much easier to > > fix client-side 9fs scripts :) > > Sorry, by "server" I did not mean "a server machine" I meant "a 9p > server program which you could run" > How would one know one wasn't getting old data? I've not really looked into replica much though honestly to know how it works, I've just followed the wiki about "staying up to date". Perhaps the wiki could be mirrored as well, and we could get a distributed update script? Perhaps this is an area of improvement for Plan 9 in general. > > ron > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1975 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 23:27 ` David Leimbach @ 2009-05-24 23:38 ` jt 2009-05-25 0:22 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 0:28 ` David Leimbach 0 siblings, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: jt @ 2009-05-24 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 656 bytes --] Mr Leimbach, ===8<=== > > How would one know one wasn't getting old data? I've not really looked > into replica much though honestly to know how it works, I've just followed > the wiki about "staying up to date". Perhaps the wiki could be mirrored as > well, and we could get a distributed update script? > > Perhaps this is an area of improvement for Plan 9 in general. > > ===8<=== You can find the wiki here : http://9.9souldier.org/wiki.plan9/plan_9_wiki/ Sources can be found here : sources.lsub.org -- though i'm not sure how up to date they are -- they seem very reliable respectfully, james francis toy (nil) [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1055 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 23:38 ` jt @ 2009-05-25 0:22 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 0:28 ` David Leimbach 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Federico G. Benavento @ 2009-05-25 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs also at http://9grid.es/wiki/plan_9_wiki/ >> How would one know one wasn't getting old data? I've not really looked >> into replica much though honestly to know how it works, I've just followed >> the wiki about "staying up to date". eh? then what about reading the man pages? anyways, if you're files are older than the ones on the server and the logs match you'll get an update, otherwise you'll get a conflict and changes won't be made to your system > > You can find the wiki here : > http://9.9souldier.org/wiki.plan9/plan_9_wiki/ > Sources can be found here : sources.lsub.org -- though i'm not sure how > up to date they are -- they seem very reliable > > respectfully, > > james francis toy (nil) > -- Federico G. Benavento ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 23:38 ` jt 2009-05-25 0:22 ` Federico G. Benavento @ 2009-05-25 0:28 ` David Leimbach 2009-05-25 0:44 ` Federico G. Benavento 1 sibling, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: David Leimbach @ 2009-05-25 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --] On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:38 PM, <jt@0xabadba.be> wrote: > Mr Leimbach, > > ===8<=== > >> >> How would one know one wasn't getting old data? I've not really looked >> into replica much though honestly to know how it works, I've just followed >> the wiki about "staying up to date". Perhaps the wiki could be mirrored as >> well, and we could get a distributed update script? >> >> Perhaps this is an area of improvement for Plan 9 in general. >> >> ===8<=== > > You can find the wiki here : > http://9.9souldier.org/wiki.plan9/plan_9_wiki/ > Sources can be found here : sources.lsub.org -- though i'm not sure > how up to date they are -- they seem very reliable > > respectfully, Yeah I guess I was not very clear. How does one find the most up to date mirror :-). How do we know which one is closest to the authoritative source, or should we care? Dave > > > james francis toy (nil) > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1730 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 0:28 ` David Leimbach @ 2009-05-25 0:44 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 6:05 ` andrey mirtchovski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Federico G. Benavento @ 2009-05-25 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs this script is probably too naive, but isn't just good enough? btw, gabriel provides a 9grid.es file to put in /dist/replica http://9grid.es/index.html?item=srv ; cat $home/bin/rc/pull #!/bin/rc rfork e # network is sources mirrors=(network 9grid.es kix.in lsub.org) flags=() while(! ~ $#* 0 && ~ $1 -*){ if(~ $1 -c -s){ flags=($flags $1) shift } flags=($flags $1) shift } if(test -f /srv/kfs.cmd) disk/kfscmd allow for(i in $mirrors){ if(replica/pull -v $flags /dist/replica/^$i $*){ if(test -f /srv/kfs.cmd) disk/kfscmd disallow exit '' } } exit mirror On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:28 PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:38 PM, <jt@0xabadba.be> wrote: >> >> Mr Leimbach, >> >> ===8<=== >>> >>> How would one know one wasn't getting old data? I've not really looked >>> into replica much though honestly to know how it works, I've just followed >>> the wiki about "staying up to date". Perhaps the wiki could be mirrored as >>> well, and we could get a distributed update script? >>> Perhaps this is an area of improvement for Plan 9 in general. >> >> ===8<=== >> >> You can find the wiki here : >> http://9.9souldier.org/wiki.plan9/plan_9_wiki/ >> Sources can be found here : sources.lsub.org -- though i'm not sure >> how up to date they are -- they seem very reliable >> >> respectfully, > > Yeah I guess I was not very clear. How does one find the most up to date > mirror :-). How do we know which one is closest to the authoritative > source, or should we care? > Dave > >> >> james francis toy (nil) > > -- Federico G. Benavento ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 0:44 ` Federico G. Benavento @ 2009-05-25 6:05 ` andrey mirtchovski 2009-05-25 8:28 ` Rudolf Sykora ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2009-05-25 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs nobody's saying anything, so i will: a kfs system will be left in an "allowed" state if all the mirrors fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 6:05 ` andrey mirtchovski @ 2009-05-25 8:28 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-25 10:07 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 10:39 ` cinap_lenrek 2 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-25 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > nobody's saying anything, so i will: a kfs system will be left in an > "allowed" state if all the mirrors fail. well, knowing little, having come late, perhaps, I do not understand... Thanks Ruda ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 6:05 ` andrey mirtchovski 2009-05-25 8:28 ` Rudolf Sykora @ 2009-05-25 10:07 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 10:39 ` cinap_lenrek 2 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Federico G. Benavento @ 2009-05-25 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs yeah, I noticed the bug the moment I click send :) On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:05 AM, andrey mirtchovski <mirtchovski@gmail.com> wrote: > nobody's saying anything, so i will: a kfs system will be left in an > "allowed" state if all the mirrors fail. > > -- Federico G. Benavento ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 6:05 ` andrey mirtchovski 2009-05-25 8:28 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-25 10:07 ` Federico G. Benavento @ 2009-05-25 10:39 ` cinap_lenrek 2009-05-25 18:27 ` Steve Simon 2 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: cinap_lenrek @ 2009-05-25 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 50 bytes --] damn, he found out our evil plan... -- cinap [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3722 bytes --] From: andrey mirtchovski <mirtchovski@gmail.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] sources down? Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:05:05 -0600 Message-ID: <14ec7b180905242305y7e1f3506ued0776e1d12f9db7@mail.gmail.com> nobody's saying anything, so i will: a kfs system will be left in an "allowed" state if all the mirrors fail. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 10:39 ` cinap_lenrek @ 2009-05-25 18:27 ` Steve Simon 2009-05-25 19:25 ` J.R. Mauro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Steve Simon @ 2009-05-25 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans > damn, he found out our evil plan... And we would have got away with it if it hadn't been for you pesky kids. -Steve ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-25 18:27 ` Steve Simon @ 2009-05-25 19:25 ` J.R. Mauro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: J.R. Mauro @ 2009-05-25 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote: >> damn, he found out our evil plan... > > And we would have got away with it if it hadn't been for you pesky kids. > And their TALKING DOG. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-24 0:17 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 0:28 ` Anant Narayanan @ 2009-05-24 1:59 ` J.R. Mauro 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: J.R. Mauro @ 2009-05-24 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:17 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, J.R. Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com> wrote: >> There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down >> AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs >> scripts. >> >> > > would be interesting to have a server that provided reliability by > using whatever mirrors are out there and falling over transparently as > things failed. Mycroftiv (on #plan9) was working on some "unkillable" cpu session that shows promise. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro 2009-05-24 0:17 ` ron minnich @ 2009-05-24 1:26 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Lyndon Nerenberg @ 2009-05-24 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > There are plenty of mirrors, I'm pretty sure the "sources is down > AGAIN" comments could be mitigated by people improving their 9fs > scripts A 9fs.local (ala termrc.loca)l would solve a lot of customization issues. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* [9fans] sources down? @ 2008-11-02 18:51 Skip Tavakkolian 2008-11-02 19:04 ` Pietro Gagliardi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Skip Tavakkolian @ 2008-11-02 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2008-11-02 18:51 Skip Tavakkolian @ 2008-11-02 19:04 ` Pietro Gagliardi 2008-11-02 21:35 ` geoff 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: Pietro Gagliardi @ 2008-11-02 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 2, 2008, at 1:51 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > [blank message] The strangest part? It's been down since this morning (I'm on Murray Hill time here on Long Island); longer than usual. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkkN+ccACgkQuv7AVNQDs+w/ngCfVIjCGT18ZDUNV6/uynighKDM dtgAnjJVMoDnAdfV0YN0wFdzhW4fhYbZ =gcnp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2008-11-02 19:04 ` Pietro Gagliardi @ 2008-11-02 21:35 ` geoff 2008-11-02 21:58 ` michael block 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: geoff @ 2008-11-02 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Sources is back up. We had a power outage and some of our machines didn't come back up automatically, though they usually do. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2008-11-02 21:35 ` geoff @ 2008-11-02 21:58 ` michael block 2008-11-02 23:46 ` Pietro Gagliardi 0 siblings, 1 reply; 49+ messages in thread From: michael block @ 2008-11-02 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 15:35, <geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote: > Sources is back up. We had a power outage and some of our machines > didn't come back up automatically, though they usually do. and here i was thinking you had taken them offline to retool them for standard time ☺. thank you for maintaining sources. it is an invaluable resource -- m ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2008-11-02 21:58 ` michael block @ 2008-11-02 23:46 ` Pietro Gagliardi 0 siblings, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Pietro Gagliardi @ 2008-11-02 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:58 PM, michael block wrote: > retool them for standard time isn't that done automatically? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkkOO7wACgkQuv7AVNQDs+yHxgCgqfsq+xr9i710y0c0Wogr7OIT JpEAoKIGJAe0FvG0ZX+muMnDimc6KoAe =sVbs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* [9fans] sources down? @ 2006-11-29 21:55 james.cook 2006-11-29 22:20 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff 0 siblings, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: james.cook @ 2006-11-29 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans cpu% 9fs sources srv tcp!sources.cs.bell-labs.com: mount failed: Hangup I haven't been able to mount sources today or yesterday. Can other people? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2006-11-29 21:55 james.cook @ 2006-11-29 22:20 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Lyndon Nerenberg @ 2006-11-29 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > I haven't been able to mount sources today or yesterday. Can other people? I have it mounted right now. --lyndon Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2006-11-29 21:55 james.cook 2006-11-29 22:20 ` Lyndon Nerenberg @ 2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff 2006-11-29 22:49 ` Charles Forsyth 2006-11-30 4:41 ` James Cook 1 sibling, 2 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: geoff @ 2006-11-29 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 918 bytes --] sources is up and I can mount it from inside and outside, with and without authentication, though we do get occasional console messages like these: Mon Nov 27 15:16:53: attach main as forsyth: not enough data in auth read Mon Nov 27 16:16:12: attach main as forsyth: not enough data in auth read Tue Nov 28 09:30:11: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto Tue Nov 28 09:30:13: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto Wed Nov 29 09:30:11: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto Wed Nov 29 09:30:13: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto In this case, your connection to sources has dropped, so you need to remove /srv/sources, and you'll need to be hostowner to do that if you don't own /srv/sources, then execute `9fs sources' again. [-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2716 bytes --] From: james.cook@utoronto.ca To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Cc: Subject: [9fans] sources down? Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:55:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20061129165535.4w2ewerpljsws0g4@webmail.utoronto.ca> cpu% 9fs sources srv tcp!sources.cs.bell-labs.com: mount failed: Hangup I haven't been able to mount sources today or yesterday. Can other people? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff @ 2006-11-29 22:49 ` Charles Forsyth 2006-11-30 4:41 ` James Cook 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: Charles Forsyth @ 2006-11-29 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans Mon Nov 27 15:16:53: attach main as forsyth: not enough data in auth read Mon Nov 27 16:16:12: attach main as forsyth: not enough data in auth read that will be my drawterm'ing to a cpu server on which i do a 9fs sources without first doing a fresh auth/factotum to use my keys instead of the cpu server's. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sources down? 2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff 2006-11-29 22:49 ` Charles Forsyth @ 2006-11-30 4:41 ` James Cook 1 sibling, 0 replies; 49+ messages in thread From: James Cook @ 2006-11-30 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:30:40PM -0500, geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > sources is up and I can mount it from inside and outside, with and > without authentication, though we do get occasional console messages > like these: > > Mon Nov 27 15:16:53: attach main as forsyth: not enough data in auth read > Mon Nov 27 16:16:12: attach main as forsyth: not enough data in auth read > Tue Nov 28 09:30:11: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto > Tue Nov 28 09:30:13: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto > Wed Nov 29 09:30:11: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto > Wed Nov 29 09:30:13: attach main as geoff: phase error protocol phase error: read in state SNeedProto > > In this case, your connection to sources has dropped, so you need to > remove /srv/sources, and you'll need to be hostowner to do that if you > don't own /srv/sources, then execute `9fs sources' again. Removing /srv/sources worked. Thanks. - James ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 49+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-24 18:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 49+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-08-24 16:42 [9fans] sources down? KADOTA Kyohei 2015-08-24 17:02 ` stevie 2015-08-24 18:04 ` KADOTA Kyohei -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2009-05-22 16:34 Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 16:51 ` ron minnich 2009-05-22 17:12 ` erik quanstrom 2009-05-22 17:23 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 20:52 ` dave.l 2009-05-22 21:15 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 22:13 ` Noah Evans 2009-05-22 22:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-22 23:06 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-22 23:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-22 23:54 ` Francisco J Ballesteros 2009-05-23 2:28 ` Anant Narayanan 2009-05-22 21:09 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:31 ` ron minnich 2009-05-22 21:43 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 22:59 ` Latchesar Ionkov 2009-05-22 21:05 ` Uriel 2009-05-22 21:13 ` Eric Van Hensbergen 2009-05-23 3:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian 2009-05-23 23:59 ` J.R. Mauro 2009-05-24 0:17 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 0:28 ` Anant Narayanan 2009-05-24 0:31 ` ron minnich 2009-05-24 23:27 ` David Leimbach 2009-05-24 23:38 ` jt 2009-05-25 0:22 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 0:28 ` David Leimbach 2009-05-25 0:44 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 6:05 ` andrey mirtchovski 2009-05-25 8:28 ` Rudolf Sykora 2009-05-25 10:07 ` Federico G. Benavento 2009-05-25 10:39 ` cinap_lenrek 2009-05-25 18:27 ` Steve Simon 2009-05-25 19:25 ` J.R. Mauro 2009-05-24 1:59 ` J.R. Mauro 2009-05-24 1:26 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 2008-11-02 18:51 Skip Tavakkolian 2008-11-02 19:04 ` Pietro Gagliardi 2008-11-02 21:35 ` geoff 2008-11-02 21:58 ` michael block 2008-11-02 23:46 ` Pietro Gagliardi 2006-11-29 21:55 james.cook 2006-11-29 22:20 ` Lyndon Nerenberg 2006-11-29 22:30 ` geoff 2006-11-29 22:49 ` Charles Forsyth 2006-11-30 4:41 ` James Cook
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).