From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Software philosophy
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:19:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XNnind8mhx9puPZux6n_p6rHPV9CUXG-XrZNotk-1aY0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSxfmKo+=8xhhvoWri=LPwtJSSzxo1WSGJBzSQcX6Px1k7=KQ@mail.gmail.com>
is that my cue, are you calling in my services?!
On 8/18/21, Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
> I changed the Subject line to better reflect the discussion. Please do go
> on.
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:57 PM Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/17/21, Keith Gibbs <k@pixelheresy.com> wrote:
>> > One Plan Nine?
>> >
>> > Sure, we have the historical version of the Bell Labs/Lucient codebase,
>> > preserved as 9legacy, but yeah we have one currently developed branch
>> > of
>> > Plan 9 called 9front. Are you proposing that to be called “Plan 9 from
>> > Bell
>> > Labs 5th edition”?
>> >
>> I bet you think I don't; you wouldn't ask, otherwise.
>>
>> > To be serious though, when has monolithic code bases ever benefited
>> > things
>> > in an Open Source community?
>>
>> You bought the "exceptionalism" Kool-Aid, lock, stock and barrel,
>> haven't you? It's a question of size: a small code base should remain
>> small, then it is not weaponisable or monetisable. So we raise the bar
>> higher and higher and shake off whatever can't stick hard enough. A
>> human natural instinct (more!, gimme more! features! bugs! anything so
>> I can have bigger, faster!) bent to the interest of elites (here in
>> Africa we know it as the Big Man Syndrome).
>>
>> > I mean the only reason would be to control who
>> > can/cannot make decisions on what goes in the stone soup.
>> Do you have incontrovertible evidence? In my caffeine-deprived state,
>> I feel you're just following the sheep gospel, no offence intended. In
>> my opinion, the trap is always there, ready to be deployed. And the
>> masses are always ready to fall into it. Occasionally a Christ figure
>> comes along to warn us, but only the elite can understand the message
>> and of course they then distort it in the direction that suits them
>> best. And the masses are none the wiser, not this time, not the next
>> time, not any other time, because the elite can be swapped out
>> entirely and the new elite becomes them, ad nauseam.
>>
>> > There are multiple
>> > BSDs. There are multiple Linuxes. Using 9legacy as more than historical
>> > baseline means that we will be stuck with decisions put in place 20-30
>> > years
>> > ago rather than iterating and moving things forward. The purpose of P9F
>> > is
>> > to “promote and support” not to regulate.
>> >
>> Sure, and an infinite variety of vehicles with wheels at the four
>> corners and seats that just occupy space and consume carbon-based
>> fuels. Even EVs where each wheel could be both motor and power
>> generator have retained that ridiculous formula. But they look
>> different (sort of, there's greater difference in time than there in
>> style). Oh, let's not ignore that autos also sit idle (my estimate)
>> 95% of their life: is that what they are designed for? And the AI in
>> my phone, is that also sitting idle? I had a couple of instances
>> recently where in the middle of the night my password locked Samsung
>> J5 decided to continue reading me the SF short story collection I
>> turned off before going to sleep.
>>
>> But Android is Open Source, isn't it? I can look under the bonned, can't
>> I?
>>
>> Well, the P9F is what it is. It will also become what it is naturally
>> attracted to unless some boundaries - Trump's fence? - are put in
>> place.
>>
>> > I would love to imagine a time when we have a resurgence of multiple
>> > Plan
>> > 9s. I would love to see Akaros and 9atom have a shot in the arm
>> > [although
>> > much of what the latter had seems to be swallowed up by 9front and
>> > 9legacy
>> > and the project dead]. I would love to see NIX get a little more
>> > traction,
>> > as it seems it is just a standalone experiment [albeit a cool one in
>> > terms
>> > of goals]. I think it would be really healthy for Jeanne and Harvey to
>> > be
>> > more closer to “family” in the community rather than third cousins. Once
>> > we
>> > have a plurality of opinions, of perspectives, of visions, then we can
>> > better broker standards and overall trajectories.
>> >
>> I'm going to leave this here, with a comment to the effect that I
>> totally disagree with the sentiments. There is room, need is not a
>> strong enough word for what I'm thinking, for creativity, but software
>> is not a primordial soup out of which complex organisms will rise to
>> take over the Universe and consume it out of existence, its and
>> theirs.
>>
>> More likely, we'll teach - by example, not intentionally, no - our AI
>> products to weaponise the tools we are no longer sufficiently
>> naturally intelligent to understand and control (tell me there's a
>> difference) and turn us into slaves because, like the human elite,
>> they will measure their worth in what they can accumulate (human
>> slaves sounds like a neat currency to me, I could use some, it's
>> worked in all of human history - ask Epstein), just like their
>> creators did.
>>
>> Nothing to do with Plan 9, of course, because it really is just a drop
>> of accidental sanity in an ocean of greed and competition. But, to
>> complete the imagery, I'd rather be plankton in a drop of Plan 9 than
>> a shark in the Linux Ocean. And I am, to the extent that I support and
>> most of all appreciate what makes my ecosystem continue to tick.
>> Including any contributions by like-minded or antagonistically natured
>> geniuses.
>>
>> Lucio.
>>
>> PS: I have a lot of time to think and unfortunately not the means to
>> study beyond a rather narrow subject matter. So my opinions are much
>> more the result of introspection than of universal knowledge. Take it
>> for what it is.
>>
>> PPS: There is always an elite, its job is to defeat by all means
>> available a middle class whose "elite nouveau" continually attempts to
>> replace it, by any means available to it. Everything revolves around
>> who owns the masses. That's Western Civilisation in a nutshell.
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T9ef6430f3025e731-Mf3f14e2f3b04e34487a920b3
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-18 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-16 11:15 [9fans] OAuth2 in factotum Demetrius Iatrakis
2021-08-17 3:48 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-17 7:47 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 3:55 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 7:02 ` [9fans] Software philosophy Skip Tavakkolian
2021-08-18 7:19 ` hiro [this message]
2021-08-18 10:15 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 9:46 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 10:13 ` vic.thacker
2021-08-18 11:34 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 11:47 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 23:44 ` hiro
2021-08-19 4:34 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-19 10:44 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-19 18:53 ` Git & Conventional Browsers (Was Re: [9fans] Software philosophy) unobe
2021-08-19 19:00 ` ori
2021-08-18 11:34 ` [9fans] Software philosophy Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 11:28 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 12:02 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 19:33 ` leimy2k via 9fans
2021-08-18 20:09 ` David du Colombier
2021-08-18 22:00 ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-19 7:08 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-19 7:59 ` sirjofri
2021-08-19 9:27 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-19 9:45 ` hiro
2021-08-19 9:51 ` hiro
2021-08-19 10:10 ` sirjofri
2021-08-19 10:38 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-19 11:45 ` hiro
2021-08-19 12:43 ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-19 19:58 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2021-08-19 10:56 ` kvik
2021-08-19 11:33 ` sirjofri
2021-08-19 20:44 ` ori
2021-08-19 9:29 ` hiro
2021-08-19 9:44 ` sirjofri
2021-08-19 9:19 ` hiro
2021-08-22 2:46 ` kokamoto
2021-08-22 3:16 ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-22 7:07 ` [9fans] Drawterm GPU (was: Software philosophy) sirjofri
2021-08-22 10:04 ` Frank D. Engel, Jr.
2021-08-22 11:49 ` sirjofri
2021-08-22 12:24 ` Chris McGee
2021-08-18 9:18 ` [9fans] OAuth2 in factotum Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 12:10 ` Ethan Gardener
2021-08-18 15:23 ` Stuart Morrow
2021-08-18 16:58 ` Stuart Morrow
2021-08-18 17:06 ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2021-08-17 15:25 ` ori
2021-08-18 3:59 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 4:20 ` ori
2021-08-18 4:42 ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-18 5:06 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-17 4:13 ` ori
2021-08-17 5:43 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-19 3:52 ` Kurt H Maier
2021-08-19 5:38 ` ori
2021-08-22 20:16 ` ori
2021-08-22 20:32 ` Demetrius Iatrakis
2021-08-22 20:38 ` ori
2021-08-22 20:36 ` ori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFSF3XNnind8mhx9puPZux6n_p6rHPV9CUXG-XrZNotk-1aY0w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=23hiro@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).