* Re: [9fans] Re: Solaris thread scheaduling
@ 2000-08-18 15:34 rob pike
[not found] ` <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2000-08-18 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
What, we should use uncooperative threads?
Adversarial threads? Anarchic threads?
I guess I don't know the terminology. If POSIX threads
are a good thing, perhaps I don't want to know what they're
better than.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] new versions of graphics programs?
@ 2000-09-07 21:57 rob pike
2000-09-07 22:50 ` Jim Choate
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2000-09-07 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I started on a couple of the tools. Since the PIC format is
now largely irrelevant - the standard image format captures
much of its capabilities - it seemed worth retiring the fb
software. Retiring it also helped keep the distribution smaller
and easier to assemble. But clearly, some of the tools in
fb/ are worth having.
I worked on a couple of the tools and stumbled into original
bugs that I didn't see how to fix, so that project has stalled.
The shipped gif and jpg tools and the iconv program should
address some of the lower-level needs. Higher-level
image processing is a project for a dedicated soul; it's a big
job.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] could those of you who have students check this out for
@ 2001-06-09 17:22 forsyth
2001-06-09 18:50 ` [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science andrey mirtchovski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-06-09 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>>our computer science department has strong roots in algorithmics.
that might be true, but do the students, in the main, write programs
except those they are required to do for assessments and projects?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-09 17:22 [9fans] could those of you who have students check this out for forsyth
@ 2001-06-09 18:50 ` andrey mirtchovski
2001-06-09 17:56 ` Boyd Roberts
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2001-06-09 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
unfortunately dan cross is very right in his analysis -- most of the
students care not for algorithmics. the three classes i listed are the most
hated ones (together with the "Systems Programming and Introduction to
Operating Systems", the UNIX class) simply because they actually make the
students think...
there are the occasional bad apples who explore the field, write code
and are interested in the 'science' part of 'computer science'.. the others
are happy to get their 3 year degrees and drone off to the job market.
andrey
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >>our computer science department has strong roots in algorithmics.
>
> that might be true, but do the students, in the main, write programs
> except those they are required to do for assessments and projects?
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-09 18:50 ` [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science andrey mirtchovski
@ 2001-06-09 17:56 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-11 8:27 ` pac
2001-06-11 15:19 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-12 0:09 ` Scott Merrilees
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-09 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
i don't think i'd go so far to call it a science -- more like an art.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-09 17:56 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-06-11 8:27 ` pac
2001-06-11 15:19 ` Dan Cross
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: pac @ 2001-06-11 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
IMHO, CS is to mathematics, as medicine is to biology; personally, I call them both "technology" :-(
Peter
--
Peter A. Cejchan
Dept. Paleobiology, Inst. Geology Acad. Sci.,
Rozvojova 135, Prague 6
CZ-16502 Czech Republic
<cej@cejchan.gli.cas.cz>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea:
Please, consider your support to the Public Library of Science initiative at
http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-09 17:56 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-11 8:27 ` pac
@ 2001-06-11 15:19 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-11 21:43 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] ` <0cb501c0f2bf$97cacea0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
1 sibling, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-06-11 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In article <041601c0f10d$72dabaa0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA> you write:
>i don't think i'd go so far to call it a science -- more like an art.
Okay, this is getting way off topic for 9fans, but, let me ask
this: at the real abstract, pure level, is science any different
at all from art? I contend that they're one and the same.
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-11 15:19 ` Dan Cross
@ 2001-06-11 21:43 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] ` <0cb501c0f2bf$97cacea0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-11 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Dan Cross" <cross@math.psu.edu>
> Okay, this is getting way off topic for 9fans, but, let me ask
> this: at the real abstract, pure level, is science any different
> at all from art? I contend that they're one and the same.
nonsense. physics is a science. i can predict things with it.
does computer science predict anything for me? i'll give you that
it does have an axiom that states:
you will be plagued by bugs in any development effort
but that doesn't really predict anything in anything that vaguely
approaches a _law_ of physics -- pick one. eg. the prohibition
of speeds greater than the of speed of light.
comp sci is more like an engineering discipline with very few
fundamentals.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <0cb501c0f2bf$97cacea0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>]
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
[not found] ` <0cb501c0f2bf$97cacea0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
@ 2001-06-11 22:43 ` paurea
2001-06-12 14:18 ` Dan Cross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: paurea @ 2001-06-11 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Boyd Roberts writes:
> From: "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@fr.inter.net>
> Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:43:45 +0200
>
> From: "Dan Cross" <cross@math.psu.edu>
> > Okay, this is getting way off topic for 9fans, but, let me ask
> > this: at the real abstract, pure level, is science any different
> > at all from art? I contend that they're one and the same.
>
> nonsense. physics is a science. i can predict things with it.
>
> does computer science predict anything for me? i'll give you that
> it does have an axiom that states:
>
> you will be plagued by bugs in any development effort
>
> but that doesn't really predict anything in anything that vaguely
> approaches a _law_ of physics -- pick one. eg. the prohibition
> of speeds greater than the of speed of light.
>
> comp sci is more like an engineering discipline with very few
> fundamentals.
¿Would you say Math is a science?.
Its theoretical foundations are based on turing machines...
(I believe all physics are written in math simbols...)
--
Saludos,
Gorka
"Curiosity sKilled the cat"
--
/"\
\ / ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
X - against ms attachments
/ \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-11 22:43 ` paurea
@ 2001-06-12 14:18 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-12 15:50 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-06-12 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In article <15141.18819.7956.967025@nido.hilbert.space> you write:
>Would you say Math is a science?.
>Its theoretical foundations are based on turing machines...
Woah, they are? Mathematics, and many of its theoretical foundations,
existed for a really long time before Alan Turing was born....
>(I believe all physics are written in math simbols...)
Basically, but each discipline seems to invent its own psuedo-
mathematical notation. Not necessarily a bad thing, but it can
get really confusing (cf. i in mathematics vs. j in engineering).
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-09 18:50 ` [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science andrey mirtchovski
2001-06-09 17:56 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-06-12 0:09 ` Scott Merrilees
2001-06-12 0:16 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] ` <0cc301c0f2c0$78949560$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
2001-06-16 23:34 ` Matt
3 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Merrilees @ 2001-06-12 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>unfortunately dan cross is very right in his analysis -- most of the
>students care not for algorithmics. the three classes i listed are the most
>hated ones (together with the "Systems Programming and Introduction to
>Operating Systems", the UNIX class) simply because they actually make the
>students think...
>
>there are the occasional bad apples who explore the field, write code
>and are interested in the 'science' part of 'computer science'.. the others
>are happy to get their 3 year degrees and drone off to the job market.
>
>andrey
Then you have the occasional CS dept / Computer Centre with a computer
usage policy that probihits all use of the univerity computer systems
except for specific course work.
Sm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-12 0:09 ` Scott Merrilees
@ 2001-06-12 0:16 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 0:42 ` Scott Merrilees
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-12 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Then you have the occasional CS dept / Computer Centre with a computer
> usage policy that probihits all use of the univerity computer systems
> except for specific course work.
yeah, but some of us got around that and the more you got around
it the more you learned -- the useful stuff.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-12 0:16 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-06-12 0:42 ` Scott Merrilees
2001-06-12 1:08 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Merrilees @ 2001-06-12 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>> Then you have the occasional CS dept / Computer Centre with a computer
>> usage policy that probihits all use of the univerity computer systems
>> except for specific course work.
>boyd:
>yeah, but some of us got around that and the more you got around
>it the more you learned -- the useful stuff.
Very true, but the above CS attitude encourages the production of
drones, while discouraging and even punishing those with the audacity
to try and do some self directed learning.
Sm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-12 0:42 ` Scott Merrilees
@ 2001-06-12 1:08 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-12 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Very true, but the above CS attitude encourages the production of
> drones, while discouraging and even punishing those with the audacity
> to try and do some self directed learning.
i don't disagree, but when you had 2000 students and one 11/780 for
all of them (even with share/hacks giving you a maximum of 128
simultaneous student logins) i guess something had to be done.
more resources would have been nice.
on the other hand, it was always a nice clause to use on password
crackers and others nuisances.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <0cc301c0f2c0$78949560$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>]
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
[not found] ` <0cc301c0f2c0$78949560$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
@ 2001-06-12 14:12 ` Dan Cross
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-06-12 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In article <0cc301c0f2c0$78949560$e8b7c6d4@SOMA> you write:
>nonsense. physics is a science. i can predict things with it.
I can predict things with computer science as well: the average
and worst-case running times of an algorithm, for instance, or
the amount of memory used by activation records in a recursive
algorithm.
>does computer science predict anything for me? i'll give you that
>it does have an axiom that states:
>
> you will be plagued by bugs in any development effort
This is a software engineering maxim. Speaking of which.... There
are ``laws'' of software engineering that are kind of like laws of
physics. Add more programmers to a late project, and it gets later;
etc.
>but that doesn't really predict anything in anything that vaguely
>approaches a _law_ of physics -- pick one. eg. the prohibition
>of speeds greater than the of speed of light.
The Church-Turing thesis; NP-complete problems; the halting problem,
just to name a few.
>comp sci is more like an engineering discipline with very few
>fundamentals.
Maybe, but that wasn't even my point.
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-09 18:50 ` [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science andrey mirtchovski
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
[not found] ` <0cc301c0f2c0$78949560$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
@ 2001-06-16 23:34 ` Matt
2001-06-28 21:29 ` Boyd Roberts
3 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-06-16 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
My friend is on his third year (of 4) of his Computer Science Degree.
I know they've covered Assembler, Java, C++ and Databases.
I mentioned to him that Dennis Ritchie posted to 9fans thinking he might be
interested.
"Who?"
I didn't bother saying
"Those who do not understand Unix are doomed to reinvent it - poorly..."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-16 23:34 ` Matt
@ 2001-06-28 21:29 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-28 22:03 ` Matt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-28 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> I know they've covered Assembler, Java, C++ and Databases.
surely s/he could have picked a 5th worthless subject...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-28 21:29 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-06-28 22:03 ` Matt
2001-06-28 23:20 ` George Michaelson
2001-06-29 4:30 ` Lucio De Re
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-06-28 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@fr.inter.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
> > I know they've covered Assembler, Java, C++ and Databases.
>
> surely s/he could have picked a 5th worthless subject...
i think that's saved up for the final year
He constantly amazes us (his friends) with his computer cluelessness.
Like finding it difficult to persuade him that his overclocked celeron might
be struggling to execute the tcp/ip stack while he was trying to play
high-end games.
Or helping him install a windows based web proxy (literally double clicking
on setup.exe)
I remember they used MS Access for their database.
We had a CS graduate come for an interview. He was clearly a bit clueless.
The questions were scaled down to make him feel a bit better when he left.
"What is a hexadecimal number?"
"A combination of numbers and letters"
He had a nice suit on though.
M
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-28 22:03 ` Matt
@ 2001-06-28 23:20 ` George Michaelson
2001-06-29 21:27 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 15:49 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-06-29 4:30 ` Lucio De Re
1 sibling, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: George Michaelson @ 2001-06-28 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> We had a CS graduate come for an interview. He was clearly a bit clueless.
> The questions were scaled down to make him feel a bit better when he left.
> "What is a hexadecimal number?"
> "A combination of numbers and letters"
>
You know, there are contexts where this is the right answer. Like, if you
manipulate them as input/output objects and need to check the datastream
to see if the tokenising input should end.
And, the difference between Hex 0F and Decimal 15 is that both have exactly
the same bit-pattern in memory. Strangely, if you add 2 apples in hex
and 2 oranges in decimal OR octal, you still have 4 bits of fruit. So, you
can do mixed-base sums after all. Why don't they teach you that at
school any more?
I had a chum who'd had a 6th finger cut off early. If they'd left it on, would
he have had any advantages doing finger arithmetic?
> He had a nice suit on though.
>
Should'a employed him then. Anybody slavish enough to dress up to get a job
is probably going to work hard for the first 7 months until disallusionment
sets in.
I still writhe with embarrassment recalling an interview for the UK N.E.R.C
to get a junior progroid job onboard the antarctic ships, when asked to
write a solution to pythagoras in pascal, there, in front of the panel. Flop
sweat and memory loss and nicotine withdrawal and sheer fright combined to
make it both humiliating for me, and revealing for them. I think they made
the right decision to quietly let me go. Still, I got to see the steam loco
graveyard at barry island so it wasn't all wasted.
cheers
-George
PS I suspect that in this niche, people aren't working as a result of a
successful interview. I think they probably know people who know people
who trust people who let them on board. If there is an interview, its
more like dogs sniffing each other, or 'do you wanna be in my gang?' than
joining the army.
--
George Michaelson | APNIC
Email: ggm@apnic.net | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064
Phone: +61 7 3367 0490 | Australia
Fax: +61 7 3367 0482 | http://www.apnic.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science
2001-06-28 22:03 ` Matt
2001-06-28 23:20 ` George Michaelson
@ 2001-06-29 4:30 ` Lucio De Re
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2001-06-29 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:03:57PM +0100, Matt wrote:
>
> He had a nice suit on though.
>
You don't get, it then :-) It's the shoes, what shoes was he
wearing? Were they well polished?
++L
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <vikki@proweb.co.uk>]
* Re: [9fans] string to list?
@ 2001-06-10 17:32 ` vikki
2001-06-10 17:47 ` Boyd Roberts
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: vikki @ 2001-06-10 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>rc irc client? sounds reasonable :)
>i wish i could find my 80-line C irc client i wrote last year for p9 (it
was
>my first project :).. come to think of it though, rc is a much better idea
>and a funnier one to implement :) wish i had a working p9 installation, i
>could've helped!
We're having a bit of a competition at work. They've got their monolithic
perl bot running. I'm trying to impress them with the plan9 version as a
learning exercise. I plan to have it do eval `{$msg} and do whatever it's
namespace will let it. They keep adding code to the perl bot and getting
deeper and deeper. Already they've had to split it in half (on my suggestion
:-) to separate information gathering and display.
>how about awk? daemonize an awk program if RC does not five you the
>utility to do it :)
yeah that's a good idea. I didn't fancy spawning awk for every line of irc.
I did wonder one day why plan9 has any command line utilities at all apart
from bind, mount, import, unmount , cd, echo and cat.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <matt@proweb.co.uk>]
* [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
@ 2001-06-12 0:39 ` Matt
2001-06-12 0:55 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-12 1:00 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-06-12 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Well it's not going too well.
I got this far but of course (I can say that now)
the `{..} doesn't return until $netdir/data sends an eof
and then prints each line
ifs='
'
for (k in `{ cat $netdir/data }) {
echo $k
}
so how do i read a line at a time before `{..} closes it's stdout?
once I've cracked that it's just about finished
M
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-12 0:39 ` [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out Matt
@ 2001-06-12 0:55 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-12 1:12 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 1:00 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2001-06-12 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
| I got this far but of course (I can say that now)
| the `{..} doesn't return until $netdir/data sends an eof
| and then prints each line
Instead of "for cat", don't you want "while read"?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-12 0:39 ` [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out Matt
2001-06-12 0:55 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2001-06-12 1:00 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 1:30 ` Jonathan Sergent
2001-06-15 8:27 ` Hermann Samso
1 sibling, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-12 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> I got this far but of course (I can say that now)
> the `{..} doesn't return until $netdir/data sends an eof
> and then prints each line
well, obviously. it's a file isn't it? <smirk>
> so how do i read a line at a time before `{..} closes it's stdout?
write some C program that that reads _unbuffered_ characters
and spits them until it sees 'end of line' (whatever that may be).
you should buffer the output, but _not_ the input.
can't be more than 20 lines of code.
btw: i hope you're dealing with 8 bit chars 'cos latin-1 will
really screw up utf encoded streams that the rest of the
system expects. years ago i wrote (on ultrix) riso [rune
to iso-latin-1] and isor (pronounced eye-sore) filters
so that the unix sam could deal with the few french docs
i had to deal with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-12 1:00 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-06-12 1:30 ` Jonathan Sergent
2001-06-15 8:27 ` Hermann Samso
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Sergent @ 2001-06-12 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Monday, June 11, 2001, at 06:00 PM, Boyd Roberts wrote:
> write some C program that that reads _unbuffered_ characters
> and spits them until it sees 'end of line' (whatever that may be).
> you should buffer the output, but _not_ the input.
You could just read the manual and use /bin/read, instead of rewriting
it.
So you get
{
while () {
line=`{read}
echo line: $line
}
} < filename
Somehow putting the < filename after the inner } makes rc reopen it for
each loop iteration. (Am I misinterpreting this?)
A more convoluted way to do to the same thing would be
{ echo 0 > /srv/something.$pid } < filename
while () {
line=`{read /srv/something.$pid}
echo line: $line
}
rm /srv/something.$pid
but that's probably better for showing off /srv to your friends than it
is for actually solving the problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-12 1:00 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 1:30 ` Jonathan Sergent
@ 2001-06-15 8:27 ` Hermann Samso
2001-06-15 11:53 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Hermann Samso @ 2001-06-15 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Boyd Roberts <boyd@fr.inter.net> wrote:
>> I got this far but of course (I can say that now)
>> the `{..} doesn't return until $netdir/data sends an eof
>> and then prints each line
> well, obviously. it's a file isn't it? <smirk>
>> so how do i read a line at a time before `{..} closes it's stdout?
> write some C program that that reads _unbuffered_ characters
> and spits them until it sees 'end of line' (whatever that may be).
> you should buffer the output, but _not_ the input.
> can't be more than 20 lines of code.
> btw: i hope you're dealing with 8 bit chars 'cos latin-1 will
> really screw up utf encoded streams that the rest of the
> system expects. years ago i wrote (on ultrix) riso [rune
> to iso-latin-1] and isor (pronounced eye-sore) filters
> so that the unix sam could deal with the few french docs
> i had to deal with.
With so many snippets of code, everyone could make use
of, isn't there any common repository? Or will they
allget integrated in time for next release?
Ok, there is always Deja News, but...
saludos,
hermann samso
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-15 8:27 ` Hermann Samso
@ 2001-06-15 11:53 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-15 12:18 ` Matt
2001-06-15 14:01 ` Matt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-15 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Hermann Samso" <samso@studserv.stud.uni-hannover.de>
> With so many snippets of code, everyone could make use
> of, isn't there any common repository? Or will they
> allget integrated in time for next release?
> Ok, there is always Deja News, but...
oh, but there is. you must have missed the 'why don't
we build a common repository' thread. i finally cracked
(in desperation) and did this:
http://mapage.noos.fr/~repo
but about the only thing it's done is to a) proove a
point and b) receive mail of the form 'nice page.
the first cut was done by hand, the second is automated
with a mash-mk mashfile on inferno.
the bitsy code should probably go back to 1127.
i don't mind adding it too.
matt's rc irc bot could be added if he so wishes.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-15 11:53 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-06-15 12:18 ` Matt
2001-06-15 14:01 ` Matt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-06-15 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@fr.inter.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
> From: "Hermann Samso" <samso@studserv.stud.uni-hannover.de>
> > With so many snippets of code, everyone could make use
> > of, isn't there any common repository? Or will they
> > allget integrated in time for next release?
> > Ok, there is always Deja News, but...
>
> oh, but there is. you must have missed the 'why don't
> we build a common repository' thread. i finally cracked
> (in desperation) and did this:
>
> http://mapage.noos.fr/~repo
>
> but about the only thing it's done is to a) proove a
> point and b) receive mail of the form 'nice page.
>
> the first cut was done by hand, the second is automated
> with a mash-mk mashfile on inferno.
>
> the bitsy code should probably go back to 1127.
> i don't mind adding it too.
>
> matt's rc irc bot could be added if he so wishes.
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-15 11:53 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-15 12:18 ` Matt
@ 2001-06-15 14:01 ` Matt
2001-06-15 14:25 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-06-15 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
bugger, sorry
>but about the only thing it's done is to a) proove a
>point and b) receive mail of the form 'nice page.
no news is good news?
>matt's rc irc bot could be added if he so wishes
A basic irc bot that evals commands it's given with
the permission & namespace of whoever started it.
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~matt/chugly.rc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out
2001-06-15 14:01 ` Matt
@ 2001-06-15 14:25 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-06-15 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> no news is good news?
well, it's better than being the middle of a firefight...
err, flamewar.
> A basic irc bot that evals commands it's given with
> the permission & namespace of whoever started it.
> http://www.proweb.co.uk/~matt/chugly.rc
ok, will do.
i got it down to this as a mashfile:
for (i in contrib/*)
contrib.html : $i/li.html;
*/*/li.html :~ $1/$2/url { mash tools/c2li $1/$2 > $0 };
*/*/url :~ $1/$2/desc {};
*/*/desc :~ $1/$2/from {};
*/*/from :~ $1/$2/date {};
*.html :~ $1/0/url { cat $1/*/li.html > $0 };
default: index.html {};
index.html : head.html contrib.html tail.html { cat head.html contrib.html tail.html > index.html };
----
the contrib directory has directories, named 0...n, which have these files:
url
desc [description]
from
date [rfc822/std11 date. it's well known and can be parsed]
li.html [this is the html <li> made out of the above files]
brucee gave me a bit of a hand, 'cos mash-mk is not mk or make.
i think he has a much better and simpler solution to the problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <aam396@mail.usask.ca>]
* [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-24 23:04 ` andrey mirtchovski
2001-06-24 22:14 ` Matt
2001-06-24 22:33 ` Scott Schwartz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: andrey mirtchovski @ 2001-06-24 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
hello,
would anyone recommend using 'sam' as the editor of choice for p9? the
problem with acme is that it's not generally available for other platforms,
and if one chooses to use acme as the $EDITOR, s/he is stuck with switching
back/forth to something else for all other platforms.
i know there's wily for linux/bsd and i've already happily compiled sam on
my irix box, so before i jump into learning it i'd like to know how useful
it is for managing relatively large and numerous source files.
is sam good for medium/semi-large projects?
i myself am a 'vi' user so the 'regular expresiveness' of sam is ok with me.
thanx: andrey
ps: i guess my question is geared towards non-bell-labs people, since they
would be the ones useing other OS's
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-06-24 23:04 ` [9fans] sam vs acme andrey mirtchovski
@ 2001-06-24 22:14 ` Matt
2001-06-24 22:33 ` Scott Schwartz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-06-24 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
acme is available in inferno which can be hosted on an OS.
www.vitanuova.com/inferno
----- Original Message -----
From: "andrey mirtchovski" <aam396@mail.usask.ca>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:04 AM
Subject: [9fans] sam vs acme
> hello,
>
> would anyone recommend using 'sam' as the editor of choice for p9? the
> problem with acme is that it's not generally available for other
platforms,
> and if one chooses to use acme as the $EDITOR, s/he is stuck with
switching
> back/forth to something else for all other platforms.
>
> i know there's wily for linux/bsd and i've already happily compiled sam on
> my irix box, so before i jump into learning it i'd like to know how useful
> it is for managing relatively large and numerous source files.
>
> is sam good for medium/semi-large projects?
>
> i myself am a 'vi' user so the 'regular expresiveness' of sam is ok with
me.
>
>
> thanx: andrey
>
> ps: i guess my question is geared towards non-bell-labs people, since they
> would be the ones useing other OS's
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-06-24 23:04 ` [9fans] sam vs acme andrey mirtchovski
2001-06-24 22:14 ` Matt
@ 2001-06-24 22:33 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-25 3:41 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-28 22:58 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2001-06-24 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
| would anyone recommend using 'sam' as the editor of choice for p9?
It's not bad. Sometimes acme is better, but I don't mind using both.
(Except that plumbing can get confused.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-25 0:28 anothy
2001-07-10 9:00 ` Ozan Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: anothy @ 2001-06-25 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
thanks to the Edit functions now being in Acme, there are three
things i find to be advantages in sam:
sam -r <host>
very nice over connections with limited bandwidth. the entire file
needn't travel over the line, just whatever part you're looking at
currently. works great in plan9→unix (my method for editing files
on a solaris box i manage while at home, over my 56K modem) and in
unix→unix modes. i don't believe win32 can be on either end of
this, which is disapointing. a co-manage this solaris box with a
windows user, and i'd love for him to be able to call sam, so i
could stop getting all these stupid cr's in my files.
text mode with sam -d
acme has no command line mode (that concept doesn't really make
much sense). in cases like editing files before vga is up on plan
9 or telnet'd into a remote box, sam -d is great. it's also an
improvement (IMHO) over ed or sed for scripts, in that it's less
tied to the idea of a line, and can better operate on arbitrary
character ranges.
cross platform
sam's available on plan 9, win32, and posix+X. acme's only
available in plan 9 and inferno. as noted earlier, inferno runs
on most popular unixes and win32, and one could easialy set up
inferno for easy access to the underlying files. then you could
use acme most anywhere. you might think it's a bit much work for
an editor, but it's doable. it's a judgement call.
other than that, i think acme is a much superior editor, even
without all the other benefits it gives. i find it to be a much
cleaner interface for multiple files, and the chording is a huge
win (IMHO; it's not for everyone). chording's probably what i
miss most in sam. that also makes acme more consistant with rio,
a win for plan 9 users. for one-off file editing, i've finally
moved from 'sam file' to 'acme file' - my big complaint there
being that acme still pops up the empty second column, wasting
screen space.
wily is a good effort, but is far inferior. i don't like using it.
-α.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-06-25 0:28 anothy
@ 2001-07-10 9:00 ` Ozan Yigit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Ozan Yigit @ 2001-07-10 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
anothy@cosym.net writes:
> wily is a good effort, but is far inferior. i don't like using it.
in which way is it /far inferior/ please? [eg. we had edit interfaces
three or was it four years ago :)] sure we don't have a general plumb
mechanism, but we are working on it. can you be specific? i maintain
wily, and i'ld like to make sure it is not "that far inferior" to
acme...
thanks... oz
--
www.cs.yorku.ca/~oz | if you couldn't find any weirdness, maybe
york u. computer science | we'll just have to make some! -- hobbes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-25 1:08 jmk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2001-06-25 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Sun Jun 24 18:05:29 EDT 2001, aam396@mail.usask.ca wrote:
> hello,
>
> would anyone recommend using 'sam' as the editor of choice for p9? the
> problem with acme is that it's not generally available for other platforms,
> and if one chooses to use acme as the $EDITOR, s/he is stuck with switching
> back/forth to something else for all other platforms.
>
> i know there's wily for linux/bsd and i've already happily compiled sam on
> my irix box, so before i jump into learning it i'd like to know how useful
> it is for managing relatively large and numerous source files.
>
> is sam good for medium/semi-large projects?
>
> i myself am a 'vi' user so the 'regular expresiveness' of sam is ok with me.
>
>
> thanx: andrey
>
> ps: i guess my question is geared towards non-bell-labs people, since they
> would be the ones useing other OS's
Until recently, there were more people using rio+sam than acme at the Labs,
there's a limit to how many new tricks you can teach old dogs like me. The
balance has changed due to new hires tending to use acme and various forms
of attrition on the old hands.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-25 7:10 nigel
2001-06-25 7:25 ` Matt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: nigel @ 2001-06-25 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
The pop up button 2 menu for editing under sam is seemed such an
improvement over the tedious point-click point-click stuff necessary
to cut or paste text under, say, Windows. Yes, I know that under
Windows 98 or better you can get a right button menu (still click
point click because it doesn't remember the last action), or generally
use the keyboard (cop out).
At first I found the lack of a button 2 menu under acme hard but now,
when I return to sam from using acme, the lack of chording makes sam
seem slow and clunky.
I've attempted to use sam as editor of choice under all circumstances,
but all circumstances for me is probably similar for others too. Once
you enter the Windows world, there are other constraints. You need an
editor which is kind to carriage returns, and in my case is really
unkind to tabs. This is in the former case not to screw up some
poorly written tools everyone else is using, and the latter to conform
to coding standards. vi/elvis/vim doesn't even pass, since it preserves tabs.
I did have a version of sam which would remove crs on read, and
replace on write, and could pretend tabs weren't 8 spaces on screen,
and replace them with spaces on write, but I lost it. Actually, it
may be on the disk of the Sparcalike in the attic but I don't have a
monitor cable for it. Anyone know if I can get a cable to connect a
monochrome sparc to modern colour monitor?
OK that's enough drivel. That should, in modern parlance, 'promote
discussion'. Where's Boyd?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-25 7:45 Richard Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Richard Miller @ 2001-06-25 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> for one-off file editing, i've finally
> moved from 'sam file' to 'acme file' - my big complaint there
> being that acme still pops up the empty second column, wasting
> screen space.
Try 'acme -c1 file'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-25 13:29 William Staniewicz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: William Staniewicz @ 2001-06-25 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Some of the folks on the lists:
rescue@sunhelp.org
-or-
geeks@sunhelp.org
... may be able to help with that.
Subscription info is at:
www.sunhelp.org
> may be on the disk of the Sparcalike in the attic but I don't have a
> monitor cable for it. Anyone know if I can get a cable to connect a
> monochrome sparc to modern colour monitor?
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-25 23:59 rob pike
2001-06-26 0:14 ` Howard Trickey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2001-06-25 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I've been planning for some time to have a go at splitting
acme the way sam is split. I didn't do it when I was writing
acme because I had so many other new things to worry
about, not because I didn't think it should be done. No
promises, but maybe some day...
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-26 4:55 anothy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: anothy @ 2001-06-26 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
//I've been planning for some time to have a go at
//splitting acme the way sam is split.
oo, oo! sign me up! should you need a beta user, i'm
your guy. i'm usually running acme on my cpu
server from home, over my 56k (if that) modem, and
throwing around something on the level of sam
rather than raw /dev/draw would be really, really
nice. now, if this makes it into Inferno's Acme, too, i
could use it cross-platform, and retire sam (or at
least samterm) for good.
-α.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] bitsy question
@ 2001-06-26 16:33 John Packer
2001-06-26 17:10 ` [9fans] " Dan Cross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: John Packer @ 2001-06-26 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I have Plan9 installed on my ipaq, but I don't have a pcmcia sleeve,
or wavelan on my network.
So I have been trying to link the bitsy to my terminal using ppp over
the
serial port. (I made a ramdisk with ip/ppp).
PPP tries to authenticate for 30 seconds (through chap, I think) then
times out.
I've tried running ppp a few different ways, but something like
ip/ppp -df -b 115200 -p /dev/eia0 -s $user:$secret 135.104.99.5
on the bitsy and something like
ip/ppp -dfS -b 115200 -p /dev/eia0 135.104.99.1
on the server.
Has anyone tried this? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Re: bitsy question
2001-06-26 16:33 [9fans] bitsy question John Packer
@ 2001-06-26 17:10 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-06-26 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: packer; +Cc: 9fans
In article <3B38BA06.E55B62AC@bway.net> you write:
>I have Plan9 installed on my ipaq, but I don't have a pcmcia sleeve,
>or wavelan on my network.
Ouch; that makes it much more difficult to use, as you have discovered.
>So I have been trying to link the bitsy to my terminal using ppp over
>the serial port. (I made a ramdisk with ip/ppp).
>
>PPP tries to authenticate for 30 seconds (through chap, I think) then
>times out.
>
>I've tried running ppp a few different ways, but something like
>
> ip/ppp -df -b 115200 -p /dev/eia0 -s $user:$secret 135.104.99.5
>
>on the bitsy and something like
>
> ip/ppp -dfS -b 115200 -p /dev/eia0 135.104.99.1
>
>on the server.
>
>Has anyone tried this? What am I doing wrong?
Well, at least one thing that you're probably encountering is that the
bitsy tries to use the serial port as a console device, and is
hardwired in the kernel to do so. In order to fix that, you have to
edit the kernel sources in /sys/src/9/bitsy/ and recompile; I managed
to turn it off by changing the argument to sa1110_uartsetup() to zero
in main.c. However, if you do ONLY that, the machine panics when it
comes up because the keyboard input queue for the console device is
nil. Whoops! You have to change sa1110_uartsetup() in sa1110uart.c
(the last routine in the file) to assign a valid Queue pointer to
kbdq. I just changed the relevant section to be:
if(console) {
uartspecial(p, 115200, &kbdq, &printq, kbdcr2nl);
} else {
kbdq = qopen(4*1024, 0, 0, 0);
}
That is, adding the ``else'' clause which calls qopen. I'm not sure
that this is the best method; if there's a better one, I'd be
interested to know.
btw- the serial console mode can be really handy at times; it's nice to
be able to put the bitsy on it's cradle, start up con, and then type
into bitsy windows without using bitsy/keyboard. The hand becomes much
less cramped.
Anyway, I'm assuming this is something you haven't messed with yet;
it'd most definately mess with ip/ppp, since every other character gets
redirected to /dev/cons!
Another problem you may have is that the bitsy uart driver doesn't
really do modem control; actually, it might be more accurate to say
that the StrongARM SA1100 doesn't do modem control signaling directly.
Instead, it simulates it using the GPIO pins on the 1100. I'm not sure
what exactly, if anything, the bitsy does differently in this regard
(the driver has a comment about the RTS/CTS stuff being h3600 specific,
but nothing more); my attempts to add DTR and RTS/CTS modem control to
the serial driver didn't work the way I had expected them to (I was
trying to hack them in in order to get my Targus stowaway keyboard
working; I did get it to mostly ``do the right thing,'' but it wasn't
perfect and I got busy with other stuff. I'll get back to it
eventually.)
I've been meaning to try out ppp on the bitsy, using my ricochet modem,
but I haven't round a serial cable for it yet (well, I haven't exactly
been looking that hard). I definately thing it'd be pretty cool to use
my bitsy to send email from the train.
bway.net, huh? You in New York? Anyone else on the list in NYC? We
ought to start a New York Plan 9 Club or something.
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Re: bitsy question
2001-06-26 17:10 ` [9fans] " Dan Cross
@ 2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
2001-06-26 20:34 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-27 1:15 ` [9fans] Two cpu servers? Ish Rattan
2001-06-26 20:09 ` [9fans] Re: bitsy question John Packer
2001-06-26 20:18 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: John Packer @ 2001-06-26 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Cross, 9fans
Dan Cross wrote:
> You have to change sa1110_uartsetup() in sa1110uart.c
> (the last routine in the file) to assign a valid Queue pointer to
> kbdq. I just changed the relevant section to be:
>
> if(console) {
> uartspecial(p, 115200, &kbdq, &printq, kbdcr2nl);
> } else {
> kbdq = qopen(4*1024, 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
This is an interesting clue. I'll try this out tonight.
> btw- the serial console mode can be really handy at times; it's nice to
> be able to put the bitsy on it's cradle, start up con, and then type
> into bitsy windows without using bitsy/keyboard.
I've noticed this - very useful.
> Another problem you may have is that the bitsy uart driver doesn't
> really do modem control
I don't think I need modem control, I'm not using a modem: just a
PPP server and client over the serial cable to my PC.
This is, I'm guessing, how ActiveSync works, and how Linux users connect
to their Ipaqs.
It just doesn't seem to authenticate.
This may be the wrong approach, I don't know.
> I've been meaning to try out ppp on the bitsy, using my ricochet modem,
> but I haven't round a serial cable for it yet (well, I haven't exactly
> been looking that hard). I definately thing it'd be pretty cool to use
> my bitsy to send email from the train.
Very.
>
> bway.net, huh? You in New York? Anyone else on the list in NYC? We
> ought to start a New York Plan 9 Club or something.
Yep.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: bitsy question
2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
@ 2001-06-26 20:34 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-29 22:32 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-27 1:15 ` [9fans] Two cpu servers? Ish Rattan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-06-26 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans; +Cc: packer
In article <3B38E7BE.D4C22541@bway.net> you write:
>
> [...]
>
>> Another problem you may have is that the bitsy uart driver doesn't
>> really do modem control
>
>I don't think I need modem control, I'm not using a modem: just a
>PPP server and client over the serial cable to my PC.
Oh duh; of course you said that earlier and I was too slow to catch
on. Yes, you're right; if you're not using a modem, you don't need
modem control. For that matter, you might not need modem control
even if you have a modem.
>This is, I'm guessing, how ActiveSync works, and how Linux users connect
>to their Ipaqs.
Well, I think they mostly use ``normal'' serial line protocols; either
just raw text passed over the serial line, or using a data transfer
protocol like xmodem. I'm not sure they'd bother with the overhead of
PPP in the general case (where they just wanted to sync data, or copy
a file; for making TCP connections and the like, yeah, you'd need PPP
or SLIP or a real network interface).
>It just doesn't seem to authenticate.
That's almost certainly the keyboard input queue messing you up.
>This may be the wrong approach, I don't know.
Well, if you've got an extra thousand bucks just laying around, definately
invest in the Wavelan route. If not, then it's a reasonable approach; it
won't zoom, though, and I've found ip/ppp pretty unreliable (using a wireless
modem, though; still, it seems to work reasonably well under FreeBSD. I
haven't been motivated enough to track down what's wrong, though).
> [...]
>
>> bway.net, huh? You in New York? Anyone else on the list in NYC? We
>> ought to start a New York Plan 9 Club or something.
>
>Yep.
Cool. Any other New Yorker's?
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Two cpu servers?
2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
2001-06-26 20:34 ` Dan Cross
@ 2001-06-27 1:15 ` Ish Rattan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Ish Rattan @ 2001-06-27 1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Does it make sense to have two cpu-servers?
I have a standalone spu/auth server running. How can I add another cpu
server to have two of these?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
-ishwar
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Re: bitsy question
2001-06-26 17:10 ` [9fans] " Dan Cross
2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
@ 2001-06-26 20:09 ` John Packer
2001-06-26 20:36 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-26 20:18 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: John Packer @ 2001-06-26 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Do you also use that serial line as the console? You'll get garbage
> in your packets that way.
>
> Sape
Hmm. I'm not running a con window when I try this.
The debugging output appears to indicate a lack of response to a CHAP
request.
Maybe it is not picking up the '-s $user:$secret' option from the client.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Re: bitsy question
2001-06-26 17:10 ` [9fans] " Dan Cross
2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
2001-06-26 20:09 ` [9fans] Re: bitsy question John Packer
@ 2001-06-26 20:18 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2001-06-26 20:28 ` Matt
2 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Latchesar Ionkov @ 2001-06-26 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 01:10:45PM -0400, Dan Cross said:
>
> bway.net, huh? You in New York? Anyone else on the list in NYC? We
> ought to start a New York Plan 9 Club or something.
I am in New York too.
Lucho
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-06-28 23:52 David Gordon Hogan
2001-06-29 21:28 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: David Gordon Hogan @ 2001-06-28 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Boyd writes:
> the only way to write code is with sam.
Ooops! You mispelled "acme"! :-)
Anyway, as we all know, ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR:
http://www.red-eagle.com/jokes/ed.html
If you don't find that funny, well, here's a bit of code
from gcc 3.0:
static const char * const ia64_reg_numbers[96] =
{ "r32", "r33", "r34", "r35", "r36", "r37", "r38", "r39",
"r40", "r41", "r42", "r43", "r44", "r45", "r46", "r47",
"r48", "r49", "r50", "r51", "r52", "r53", "r54", "r55",
"r56", "r57", "r58", "r59", "r60", "r61", "r62", "r63",
"r64", "r65", "r66", "r67", "r68", "r69", "r70", "r71",
"r72", "r73", "r74", "r75", "r76", "r77", "r78", "r79",
"r80", "r81", "r82", "r83", "r84", "r85", "r86", "r87",
"r88", "r89", "r90", "r91", "r92", "r93", "r94", "r95",
"r96", "r97", "r98", "r99", "r100","r101","r102","r103",
"r104","r105","r106","r107","r108","r109","r110","r111",
"r112","r113","r114","r115","r116","r117","r118","r119",
"r120","r121","r122","r123","r124","r125","r126","r127"};
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-10 10:32 rog
2001-07-10 10:43 ` Lucio De Re
2001-07-10 22:57 ` Steve Kilbane
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: rog @ 2001-07-10 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]
i've not used wily, but IMHO there are some places where a unix-based
acme clone could never approach the real acme, namely those places
where acme leverages the power of plan 9 (e.g. the filesystem
interface, and the stuff you can do with a simple shell command under
plan 9 which is impossible/extremely involved under unix)
much of the power of acme comes from living in happy symbiosis with
plan 9 - acme under unix is kind of like a hacked off limb; it looks
similar to the original, but won't work so well...
> [eg. we had edit interfaces three or was it four years ago :)]
presumably by this you mean the named-pipe RPC interface, not the sam
command Edit command? (which doesn't seem to be in wily)
cheers,
rog.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2001 bytes --]
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:00:48 GMT
Message-ID: <ycdbsmudxz7.fsf@tiger.cs.yorku.ca>
anothy@cosym.net writes:
> wily is a good effort, but is far inferior. i don't like using it.
in which way is it /far inferior/ please? [eg. we had edit interfaces
three or was it four years ago :)] sure we don't have a general plumb
mechanism, but we are working on it. can you be specific? i maintain
wily, and i'ld like to make sure it is not "that far inferior" to
acme...
thanks... oz
--
www.cs.yorku.ca/~oz | if you couldn't find any weirdness, maybe
york u. computer science | we'll just have to make some! -- hobbes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-10 10:32 rog
@ 2001-07-10 10:43 ` Lucio De Re
2001-07-18 8:43 ` David Rubin
2001-07-10 22:57 ` Steve Kilbane
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2001-07-10 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:32:39AM +0100, rog@vitanuova.com wrote:
>
> much of the power of acme comes from living in happy symbiosis with
> plan 9 - acme under unix is kind of like a hacked off limb; it looks
> similar to the original, but won't work so well...
>
I have used wily, although not extensively. I think it was Nigel who
pointed out the frustration of using the cursor keys and getting an
(at the time) unexpected response.
If I could not have acme, wily would be great, but I find small
inconsistencies a greater curse than large differences.
In that respect, Unix sam is less traumatic than wily, yet I have
little doubt that wily knocks the spots off sam on Unix as regards
usefulness.
It's in fact a great pity. If I could back up my opinions with
actions, I would recommend that wily should head just far enought away
from acme to stand on its own two feet, that is, to be sufficiently
different not to confuse and irritate the Plan 9 user, while at the
same time retaining those features that make it more than a mere
curiosity (yet another editor?).
I guess the ideal situation will arise when (wait for this :-) acme
and wily coexist on Plan 9 and Plan 9 users find it worthwhile to use
the younger version.
Is there anything in wily for acme to learn? I never got to use it
extensively, so I can't really tell. But there is definitely merit to
the editor as a Unix tool, unfortunately much less so for the Plan 9
user than for those who are not so privileged :-)
++L
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-10 10:43 ` Lucio De Re
@ 2001-07-18 8:43 ` David Rubin
2001-07-18 21:17 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: David Rubin @ 2001-07-18 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Lucio De Re wrote:
> [...] yet I have
> little doubt that wily knocks the spots off sam on Unix as regards
> usefulness.
This is not true at all, IMO. I've used both sam and wily, and I've found that
wily is too slow, especially when searching for text in large documents. Also,
having used Acme, wily is a lot less similar to Acme than Unix sam is like Plan9
sam. WRT "usefulness," that depends entirely on how you *use* the editor...sam
boots faster and finds text faster. Everything else seems to be approximately
equal.
david
--
If 91 were prime, it would be a counterexample to your conjecture.
-- Bruce Wheeler
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 8:43 ` David Rubin
@ 2001-07-18 21:17 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 21:40 ` Scott Schwartz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-18 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "David Rubin" <dlrubin@hotmail.com>
> This is not true at all, IMO. I've used both sam and wily, and I've found that
> wily is too slow, especially when searching for text in large documents.
i'd say that rob's caching code is a big win. have you read the sam
implementation paper?
i understand the advances rob made with acme, but i can't use it.
sam is for me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 21:17 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-18 21:40 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-18 21:51 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2001-07-18 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> i'd say that rob's caching code is a big win.
Sam rocks. And the new version uses some of acme's internals, to good
effect. I've been editing some moderately large files (few hundred MB)
that sam handles fine, while "vim" takes forever to do anything.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 21:40 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2001-07-18 21:51 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-18 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Sam rocks.
yup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 21:51 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-18 23:00 ` Scott Schwartz
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: George Michaelson @ 2001-07-18 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I decided to try again with the FreeBSD port of sam, since I can't get
p9 to boot on my boxen.
It makes well. It still assumes /usr/tmp exists which hasn't been true on
BSD derived UNIX for some time, but is trivial to fix. Interestingly it
remains true to the spirit of the car with one warning light labelled "?"
since it dumped core, and I had to truss it to find what it was looking
for that it couldn't find.
The tutorial sam.tut.ms won'd format with the current spec nroff/groff
(first page is fine, subsequent pages are 2 columns approx 8 chars wide
on each margin with whitespace inbetween) but since there is a .ps I didn't
bother trying to fix this.
The main thing Is that in order to learn how to use this on a unix system
under a WM you have two choices:
1) pay somebody (Boyd?) to stand behind you with a baseball bat
and hit you HARD every time you press the wrong button, based
on knowing motif derived or other X10/X11 and/or M$ influenced
assumptions about mouse button modality and bindings.
2) completely re-write your existing WM to use Samlike modality
and bindings or shift to a 9wm or like derived WM
Its really hard to have any other set of expected behaviour and
maintain rational thought processes while re-converting to what sam wants
when the mouse is in that window.
Also, some of the scrollbar behaviour and the split window behavior inside
the sam window are (for me at least) counter intuitive: its very hard to
work out what is a command input state and an edit state, there are'nt that
many visual clues to what is being done, the scrollbar feedback is very scampy.
The choice of font is a royal pain. I know this is close to religion and
also a layering violation (form:function issues) but that the sam window
is almost illegible alongside other xterm text doesn't bode well. If you
want a simple example, look at the results of postscript with screendumps
in them for the sam documentation: why do the Sam images format so badly
on the screen while the postscript text is so easy to read?
Of course, I'm criticising a work of beauty, and that I was able to follow
the tutorial, load the text via sam -d, convert emacs to vi and back again
was really lovely. I can see where x/../ is heading, I can see why its better
than the ed 1,$/../ model, but I'm not yet sufficiently au fait to say I've
cut over a rubicon to use it every day of my life.
I would also add that this mirrors my experience trying teco again a few
weeks back: its deliciously easy to load, and to run the tutorial but you're
left with a vague feeling its also lacking something.
And since like many other lurkers here I retain an obligation at work to
maintain systems where I will have to use ed/vi and derived editors,
I have to deal with the 1) and 2) problems ongoing. I can't afford Boyds
retainer in quality Whiskey.
So I'd say yes, its provably a better way (tm) but if you have to think
impure thoughts, a little grace can be a difficult thing to live with.
Like Augustine, I think I have to say "... but not yet lord"
cheers
-George
--
George Michaelson | APNIC
Email: ggm@apnic.net | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064
Phone: +61 7 3367 0490 | Australia
Fax: +61 7 3367 0482 | http://www.apnic.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
@ 2001-07-18 23:00 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-19 0:00 ` Boyd Roberts
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2001-07-18 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
| I decided to try again with the FreeBSD port of sam, since I can't get
| p9 to boot on my boxen.
Try http://www.cse.psu.edu/~schwartz/sam-9.3.1-unix.tar.bz2
That's a unix port of the version of sam from the 3rd edition, which
uses some of acme's data structures. You'll need an existing samterm
to talk to it, but you just installed that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-18 23:00 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2001-07-19 0:00 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 0:12 ` suspect
2001-07-20 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
3 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-19 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>
> I decided to try again with the FreeBSD port of sam, since I can't get
> p9 to boot on my boxen.
freeBSD port? just take the:
http://netlib.bell-labs.com/magic/netlib_find?db=0&pat=sam+pike
and do it. i've done it a zillion times. i think it's the
_first_ thing i do when faced with a new contract; spending time
to build an efficient environment pays off in the long term.
for the the linux zealots, after doing it for the nth time, i
put the Make.linux's at:
http://www.planete.net/~boyd/code/sam.Make.linux.bundle
> It makes well. It still assumes /usr/tmp exists which hasn't been true on
> BSD derived UNIX for some time, but is trivial to fix.
yes it is. who cares where /tmp is?
> Interestingly it remains true to the spirit of the car with one warning light
> labelled "?" since it dumped core, and I had to truss it to find what it was
> looking for that it couldn't find.
weird, it's been solid as a rock since i converted in 1992. i had been
using a copy of a gnarly X11 version that various people had done good
work with to get it to go -- you know who you are.
> 1) pay somebody (Boyd?) to stand behind you with a baseball bat
> and hit you HARD every time you press the wrong button, based
> on knowing motif derived or other X10/X11 and/or M$ influenced
> assumptions about mouse button modality and bindings.
nope. anyway, i prefer 9mm automatics:
http://home.fr.inter.net/boyd/targets/last.jpg
yeah, stuck on that 10m plateau.
just get in there and use it. took me a while to get to
grips with 'x' (i used to cheat with 's'). hitting people is
a waste of time. 'x' got my group free beer for delivering
on time this horrible DCE/RPC ENCINA VSAM mess. worst project
i'd even seen.
it was all ISO 9000 run. before i could use sam i had to write a test
spec and then a test report based on the test spec. that's before the
project leader told the great story how he had dinner, in paris, with
his wife, in a brassiere
err, no, brasserie [lit. brewery]. i nearly spat hot and sour
soup everywhere in some fit of hysteria.
> Also, some of the scrollbar behaviour and the split window behavior inside
> the sam window are (for me at least) counter intuitive: its very hard to
> work out what is a command input state and an edit state, there are'nt that
> many visual clues to what is being done, the scrollbar feedback is very scampy.
nah, the cerebellum picks that up pretty quickly.
> The choice of font is a royal pain.
i like constant width fonts, so my code lines up. but, it's a good
thing that sam copes with fonts correctly.
> I would also add that this mirrors my experience trying teco again a few
> weeks back:
weeks? been a long time since i used teco. 20+ years? i got involved
in some bug fixing of a port to a unix 11/45 some years later. i think
the 45 had sep I&D.
> I have to deal with the 1) and 2) problems ongoing. I can't afford Boyds
> retainer in quality Whiskey.
JD? i have half a bottle lying around.
apparently the going rate for ex-legionaires, as bodyguards, is less than
yer base level sysadmin in france. that was a bit of a shock. sysadmin
pays real well, but it's just as boring for an ex-code cutter as being
a bodyguard is for an ex-legionaire.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-18 23:00 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-19 0:00 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-19 0:12 ` suspect
2001-07-19 0:14 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-20 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
3 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: suspect @ 2001-07-19 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, George Michaelson wrote:
> 1) pay somebody (Boyd?) to stand behind you with a baseball bat
> and hit you HARD every time you press the wrong button, based
> on knowing motif derived or other X10/X11 and/or M$ influenced
I have been using David Hogans 9wm in conjunction with Sam for a couple of
years. Quite often the first thing I do when I install a new UNIX or am
given an account on a new system is to install 9wm, then Sam.
There is an addition to 9wm, called w9wm, which gives you 'paging', for
efficient multi-slacking.
I love Sam and 9wm/w9wm, and could not possibly live without them.
-
>
> 2) completely re-write your existing WM to use Samlike modality
> and bindings or shift to a 9wm or like derived WM
>
> Its really hard to have any other set of expected behaviour and
> maintain rational thought processes while re-converting to what sam wants
> when the mouse is in that window.
>
> Also, some of the scrollbar behaviour and the split window behavior inside
> the sam window are (for me at least) counter intuitive: its very hard to
> work out what is a command input state and an edit state, there are'nt that
> many visual clues to what is being done, the scrollbar feedback is very scampy.
>
> The choice of font is a royal pain. I know this is close to religion and
> also a layering violation (form:function issues) but that the sam window
> is almost illegible alongside other xterm text doesn't bode well. If you
> want a simple example, look at the results of postscript with screendumps
> in them for the sam documentation: why do the Sam images format so badly
> on the screen while the postscript text is so easy to read?
>
> Of course, I'm criticising a work of beauty, and that I was able to follow
> the tutorial, load the text via sam -d, convert emacs to vi and back again
> was really lovely. I can see where x/../ is heading, I can see why its better
> than the ed 1,$/../ model, but I'm not yet sufficiently au fait to say I've
> cut over a rubicon to use it every day of my life.
>
> I would also add that this mirrors my experience trying teco again a few
> weeks back: its deliciously easy to load, and to run the tutorial but you're
> left with a vague feeling its also lacking something.
>
> And since like many other lurkers here I retain an obligation at work to
> maintain systems where I will have to use ed/vi and derived editors,
> I have to deal with the 1) and 2) problems ongoing. I can't afford Boyds
> retainer in quality Whiskey.
>
> So I'd say yes, its provably a better way (tm) but if you have to think
> impure thoughts, a little grace can be a difficult thing to live with.
>
> Like Augustine, I think I have to say "... but not yet lord"
>
> cheers
> -George
> --
> George Michaelson | APNIC
> Email: ggm@apnic.net | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064
> Phone: +61 7 3367 0490 | Australia
> Fax: +61 7 3367 0482 | http://www.apnic.net
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2001-07-19 0:12 ` suspect
@ 2001-07-20 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-20 9:47 ` George Michaelson
3 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2001-07-20 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
George Michaelson wrote:
> Its really hard to have any other set of expected behaviour and
> maintain rational thought processes while re-converting to what sam wants
> when the mouse is in that window.
But sam's button-2 menu is much better than the usual WM functions.
It all depends on what you are accustomed to (habits).
I regularly use "sam" on Windows, Solaris, and Plan 9;
I haven't found a more effective text editor.
I have in the past used TECO, which offers only two advantages:
(1) more programmability (not limited to extended r.e.s)
(2) multiple snarf buffers (Q-registers).
In "sam" I miss (2) much more than (1).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-20 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
@ 2001-07-20 9:47 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-20 10:08 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: George Michaelson @ 2001-07-20 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> I have in the past used TECO, which offers only two advantages:
> (1) more programmability (not limited to extended r.e.s)
> (2) multiple snarf buffers (Q-registers).
> In "sam" I miss (2) much more than (1).
I think 1) is of limited use to most people, and much use to skilled people.
Structured RE probably sit in the same space, I honour Rob for being able
to both write and exploit them, I still grapple with some base concepts.
2) I can see both sides of. Newer vi have multipe undo as a stack *and*
named/numbered snarf space *and* the u-u toggle behaviour of do/undo and
I actually find I like both/all three.
What amused me was that trying to follow the sam -d tute, I typed in
text by snarfing it (xterm wise, not sam/9term) into the sam edit input
state. And, I scored the leading ^ (thats 4 spaces) at each line.
The tutorial didn't show me how to remove them quite how I expected, and
my simplistic use of ed s/^....// failed. But, when I went to sam on X
and not sam -d of *course* I used the mouse to do this, and it just worked.
So for all I stand confused, I could use it in seconds, and it just worked.
Boyd speaks of 'ports' -for me, making current spec sam on FreeBSD meant
copying Make.BSDi to Makefile, and changing -I/usr/include/posix to posix4
and X11 to X11R6 (and some associated X link requirements, talk about bloat:
R6 pulls in pthreads and ICE and 2 other libraries) and it just worked.
I think sam needs/deserves a bit more tute doc. Only a little more. the
ed/ex/vi style brought up to date? god, how I miss the V6/7 learn programme
-George
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-20 9:47 ` George Michaelson
@ 2001-07-20 10:08 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-20 16:44 ` Ozan Yigit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-20 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>
> 2) I can see both sides of. Newer vi have multipe undo as a stack *and*
> named/numbered snarf space *and* the u-u toggle behaviour of do/undo and
> I actually find I like both/all three.
vi's 'undo' was always broken. with sam's, which is dead easy to
implement once you've made the crucial insight, makes using 'x'
worry free. you start with a first cut, try it and then use 'u'
and stepwise refinement until you've persuaded the file(s) to
come 'round to your way of thinking.
i use sam on unix, windows ('cept it's broken on these damn vaio's
on '2000) and plan 9 (when i can -- damn vaio's). only way to write
html and damn useful to tame machine generated html glop.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-20 10:08 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-20 16:44 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-07-20 21:57 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Ozan Yigit @ 2001-07-20 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
boyd@fr.inter.net (Boyd Roberts) writes:
> vi's 'undo' was always broken. with sam's, which is dead easy to
> implement once you've made the crucial insight, makes using 'x'
> worry free. you start with a first cut, try it and then use 'u'
> and stepwise refinement until you've persuaded the file(s) to
> come 'round to your way of thinking.
sam's undo is broken on the terminal side; it never shows you
where it is undoing. this is not hard to fix, as i have done once
in the past, but those changes now lost. perhaps someone will fix
it on the common version.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-10 10:32 rog
2001-07-10 10:43 ` Lucio De Re
@ 2001-07-10 22:57 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-10 23:23 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kilbane @ 2001-07-10 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
rog wrote:
> i've not used wily, but IMHO there are some places where a unix-based
> acme clone could never approach the real acme, namely those places
> where acme leverages the power of plan 9.
All true; the RPC interface library is a nightmare to use, compared
with the ease of just echoing into appropriate files. However, that's
a given anyway.
> much of the power of acme comes from living in happy symbiosis with
> plan 9 - acme under unix is kind of like a hacked off limb; it looks
> similar to the original, but won't work so well...
Is this just from a programmer's point of view, or does it apply purely
to someone who sees both through their interface? For example, if the
mail reader manages to present mail messages as files which are opened
in windows, is one better than the other, to the user?
> > [eg. we had edit interfaces three or was it four years ago :)]
>
> presumably by this you mean the named-pipe RPC interface, not the sam
> command Edit command? (which doesn't seem to be in wily)
There were two. There was an attempt to emulate acme's e pipelines
(a miserable failure), and a much cleaner, better and simpler | > <.
The former used the RPC library, the latter was a builtin.
There were differences. In particular, the window layout heuristics
stopped trying to be like acme, and tried to be nice, instead. By that,
I don't mean that acme's heuristics weren't nice, but that wily's
attempts to match acme weren't producing something that was pleasant
to use. A major revision produced something that wouldn't rearrange
windows unless it had to, which was a nicer user experience than wily
had previously offered. However, by this time, it didn't have cursor
warping that worked in the same manner as acme, and didn't have the
convenient warping-back that acme had.
Wily only had two fonts. iirc, the B3-on-<stdio.h> stuff didn't work as well
(or in the same manner). win, as an application, was greatly reduced under
wily, but that's more a fault of UNIX's ttys and the immense cruft they
demand, rather than wily's faults.
Wily treated tags differently from acme. afaik, the filename in acme is
just the string at the start of the tag [been a long time since i looked],
while wily maintained filenames internally, truncated them to shorter
strings with environment variables, and mused over mounted directories.
Wily was never that hot on working out whether it should save a modified
window on closing, if the window had been created by a client.
Wily didn't have the save/restore layout features, although it may do now.
In day-to-day usage, wily was very nice. The window management worked smoothly,
cursor keys worked, and it looked great. It crashed on me occasionally, but
generally less than the OS did. Where it fell down was that it was just too
much damn work to write clients for it.
steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-10 22:57 ` Steve Kilbane
@ 2001-07-10 23:23 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 6:55 ` Steve Kilbane
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-10 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Steve Kilbane" <steve@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>
> All true; the RPC interface library is a nightmare to use, compared
> with the ease of just echoing into appropriate files. However, that's
> a given anyway.
yes, i've used a bunch of RPC. the DCE/RPC has to be _the worst_.
the NFS kernel directory XDR is pretty 'special'.
it's this complex system thinking stuff:
we build complex things because _we can_
much like the story about the tests between the sidewinder and the
falcon air-to-air missile tests [iirc the falcon turned into the
phoenix aim-54]. the falcon people had an aircraft hanger full
of the stuff. when asked what sort of test equipment they required
the sidewinder people replied:
oh, a screwdriver and a flashlight
_sidewinder_ is a great book. it may be military, but it talks
about _design_.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-10 23:23 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-11 6:55 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-11 13:24 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kilbane @ 2001-07-11 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I wrote:
[ stuff saying wily's message interface isn't as easy to use as Plan 9's
writing to files ]
and Boyd wrote:
[ stuff about sidewinder missiles ]
I'm amazed. I really am.
But to respond to a specific point:
> we build complex things because _we can_
I don't think that's quite true. wily's RPC isn't nearly as nice to use
as Plan 9's writing to files, but I presume that Plan 9's library for
driving 9P isn't as nice to use as writing to the files
either; if it was, that'd be the functionality you'd see from the shell.
Wily's RPC isn't the nightmare that XDR was, for example, but then, it
was to solve a much simpler problem. I think part of the reason why we build
complex things is because we're trying to anticipate problems that are
incorrectly viewed through foresight.
steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 6:55 ` Steve Kilbane
@ 2001-07-11 13:24 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 21:20 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-12 8:31 ` Ozan Yigit
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-11 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Steve Kilbane" <steve@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>
> and Boyd wrote:
>
> [ stuff about sidewinder missiles ]
>
> I'm amazed. I really am.
i think you miss my point. simple stuff works. complex
stuff doesn't and if it does it's only because there's
an army out there to nurse it along.
bentley quotes gorden bell [Digital h/w designer]:
the cheapest, fastest and most reliable components
are those that aren't there.
missing components don't make mistakes, are secure and
don't need testing, documentation or maintenence.
> I don't think that's quite true. wily's RPC isn't nearly as nice to use
> as Plan 9's writing to files, but I presume that Plan 9's library for
> driving 9P isn't as nice to use as writing to the files
> either; if it was, that'd be the functionality you'd see from the shell.
i was not targeting wily or acme or sam. i was thinking of more
complex stuff. perl or C++ are probably good examples of things
that started out relatively simple (albeit perl was such a mess
from the beginning) and then evolved into these dreadfully complex,
horrible messes.
i was trying to express my distaste for people who design things
that are insanely complex and step back and think:
gee, i'm clever to have build this incredibly complex thing
no, that _thing_ will bite you further down the track and it
was foolish to build it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 13:24 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-11 21:20 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-12 10:36 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-12 8:31 ` Ozan Yigit
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kilbane @ 2001-07-11 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Boyd wrote:
> i think you miss my point.
Not really. Just enjoying the associations.
> simple stuff works. complex
> stuff doesn't and if it does it's only because there's
> an army out there to nurse it along.
can't argue with that.
> i was trying to express my distaste for people who design things
> that are insanely complex and step back and think:
>
> gee, i'm clever to have build this incredibly complex thing
that's fair enough, although i don't think that people try to
make things complex for the sake of it; i just think they don't try
hard enough to make it simple. part of that is lack of 20-20 foresight,
as mentioned before, but i suspect that most of it is lack of suitable
education.
there should be a course, duh 101.
steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 21:20 ` Steve Kilbane
@ 2001-07-12 10:36 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-12 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Steve Kilbane" <steve@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>
>
> Not really. Just enjoying the associations.
the thought had crossed my mind.
> that's fair enough, although i don't think that people try to
> make things complex for the sake of it; ...
i think they do. in the 'real world' (tm) they live to
do it. the number of unworkable, complex, insanely
stupid designs i've seen leave me with this unswerving
opinion.
i saw a proposed DNS addressing scheme that would take
an arbitrary top level domain and use that for the
the internal machines and the registered domain with
the externally visible machines. this was smack in
the middle of the new TLD proposals.
tried to tell 'em that they had two recipes for disaster:
- two names for the same machine would cause confusion
- _should_ the TLD they chose be allocated _everything_
would break
a complete waste of breath.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 13:24 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 21:20 ` Steve Kilbane
@ 2001-07-12 8:31 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-07-12 10:38 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Ozan Yigit @ 2001-07-12 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
boyd@fr.inter.net (Boyd Roberts) writes:
> ... i was thinking of more
> complex stuff. perl or C++ are probably good examples of things
> that started out relatively simple (albeit perl was such a mess
> from the beginning) and then evolved into these dreadfully complex,
> horrible messes.
i am holding a colleague's copy of the two-inch-thick "special edition"
(party size) stroustrup book, and just noticed that preface to the first
edition quotes whorf: "language shapes the way we think, and determines
what we can think about." [which is either sad or hilarious, depending
on what one thinks of whorf and c++]
oz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-11 6:52 nemo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: nemo @ 2001-07-11 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
: while wily maintained filenames internally, truncated them to shorter
: strings with environment variables, and mused over mounted directories.
I used to love that until the day I used a different shell and almost all
my windows were tagged $CWD/blah
Perhaps just a matter of ignoring variables like CWD.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>]
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-11 17:53 ` David Gordon Hogan
2001-07-11 19:19 ` James A. Robinson
2001-07-11 23:11 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: David Gordon Hogan @ 2001-07-11 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
boyd@fr.inter.net writes:
> no, that _thing_ will bite you further down the track and it
> was foolish to build it.
Sadly, that thing often bites everyone else down the track,
not just its perpetrator.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 17:53 ` David Gordon Hogan
@ 2001-07-11 19:19 ` James A. Robinson
2001-07-11 21:15 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-11 23:11 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: James A. Robinson @ 2001-07-11 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Random thoughts on acme, sam, and the acme clone wily...
I've never used the real acme for any length of time, but I did use wily
for many years under Linux and Solaris. For the past year or so I've
been using sam as my main editor. I just installed the latest Inferno
updates and have played around with the new Inferno acme (now with Edit!).
One thing that wily had in commmon with acme was the concept of a scratch
window, and it had the ability to have guides. While I liked that,
I also very much like sam's ~~sam~~ body. The concept of a window for
edit commands to run on the active window is very nice. With wily,
if you execute >, <, or | commands, it runs it on the selected text in
what it thinks is the active body. That's a nice feature, similar in
concept to the ~~sam~~ window.
The reason I like an entry window or scratch space which works on the
most recent selecteed text is that I don't have enough space to work in
the tag. Because acme uses full file names, often I find myself with
not much space in the tag for |, >, or < commands. I know it will scroll
along, but for some reason I just don't like typing commands into the
tag when the front half gets scrolled off the left-hand edge.
I don't know if Plan 9 acme takes advantage of shell variables, but the
one in inferno doesn't appear to. One thing nice about wily was that
you could have defined $pisa_util/JournalLister.java to reference the
file /home/jimr/proj/pisa/src/org/highwire/util/JournalLister.java.
Now that acme has the Edit command, sam's power is available but,
unless I'm missing something, it's still a bit of a disconnect using
Edit on a window. Using the tag works, but it is kind of restrictive
in terms of space (I often use varitions of x/pat/ { nested commands }).
Using Edit commands picked up from a scratch body (cut, paste, move to
target body's tag and paste into Edit) works well enough, but I'd really
love to see an ~~acme~~ body which just knows the last active body, and
lets me execute commands I type in or mouse2 on. I'm curious whether
or not anyone else has the same interface tastes?
My other thought is that, if an ~~acme~~ window were created so commands
ran on a server on the other side of a wire, it would be very fast to
make edits on large files, since all the data could be processed on the
server side -- you would only pull down updates to the visible portion.
I know Rob mentioned he had thought about a client/server approach to
acme, and think that is an awesome idea.
Jim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 19:19 ` James A. Robinson
@ 2001-07-11 21:15 ` Steve Kilbane
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kilbane @ 2001-07-11 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Jim mused:
> target body's tag and paste into Edit) works well enough, but I'd really
> love to see an ~~acme~~ body which just knows the last active body
this worked in sam because of click-to-type. i don't know whether it
would work in acme. it *could* work in wily, since wily remembers the
last window on which you clicked; it did so in order that | > < would
work from misc guide files.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-11 17:53 ` David Gordon Hogan
2001-07-11 19:19 ` James A. Robinson
@ 2001-07-11 23:11 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-11 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "David Gordon Hogan" <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
> Sadly, that thing often bites everyone else down the track,
> not just its perpetrator.
oh so true ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-11 20:16 rob pike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2001-07-11 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Actually I mistyped. It's a 2-1 chord. Use button 1 to select the
command (minus the Edit word), then move the mouse to the
Edit word, push 2, click (or just press) 1, release 2. It's easier
to do than to type. The same method gives arguments to Look,
Put, etc., even echo, cat, and rm.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-11 20:36 rog
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: rog @ 2001-07-11 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> > You can use the 1-2 chord to execute an arbitrarily long Edit command
> Do you mean passing a Snarfed argument to Edit in the target window tag?
i think rob meant the 2-1 chord. the only slight problem being that
you have to reselect the argument text every time.
the Look command remembers its last chorded argument, which avoids this
to a certain extent; perhaps Edit could too?
rog.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-11 20:36 rob pike
2001-07-11 21:09 ` Dan Cross
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2001-07-11 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> the Look command remembers its last chorded argument
It does?
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-11 21:01 rog
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: rog @ 2001-07-11 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> > the Look command remembers its last chorded argument
> It does?
seems to.
e.g. in this message, double click on 'the', 2-1 chord on
"Look", then continue button-2 (only) clicking: it continues
to search for the same string.
i haven't investigated any further than that...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
@ 2001-07-12 8:42 forsyth
2001-07-12 13:56 ` Laura Creighton
2001-07-12 16:13 ` Ozan Yigit
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-07-12 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>>i'm particularly fond of the acme interface, and i really
>>like the chording (okay, maybe it's not for everyone, but _i_
>>really like it). i'm asking about non-techie folks. for them,
>>wouldn't a single-button interface be simpler to understand?
not necessarily, since the functionality of the extra buttons
must be provided somehow, whether by menus, pop-up menus,
key-mouse combinations, keys alone, or some other way. much might
depend on the choice of conventions for using more than one button.
that in acme all three buttons select text is a big simplification.
i usually introduce it as follows: ``button 1 selects text, button 2
selects text, and button 3 ...'' and during the following pause
nearly everyone says ``selects text?''. i then explain
that `of course' each button does different things with
the text selected. that seems fine. the chording for cut/paste/copy
takes a little practice, but since it has a `feel' much like grabbing
text from the screen, that also seems fine. outside acme,
the Blit convention (perhaps adopted from Smalltalk, i don't know)
was something like: button 1 generally selected things, button 2 provided local
operations (usually on the thing selected), and button 3 provided global operations
for the application, with a few exceptions such as paint programs.
most menus were kept fairly small.
i know at least one non- technical user of acme who sends and receives
mail, plumbing photos and other things, and editing quite happily.
other non-technical people i've shown it to wanted to use acme on
their machines for document preparation and email because the
organisation into columns and frames and the use of the buttons was
just so much more effective than their `desktop' or a clutter of
windows. (they also like the soft use of colour.)
contrary to Tog's advice on this point: with care i suspect
you can make abstractions simple and effective enough without insisting on
drawing a tenuous likeness to something in the `real world'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
2001-07-12 8:42 [9fans] architectures forsyth
@ 2001-07-12 13:56 ` Laura Creighton
2001-07-12 16:13 ` Ozan Yigit
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Laura Creighton @ 2001-07-12 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans; +Cc: lac
re: drawing tenuous likenesses to the real world.
It is possible in the days before everybody knew what a computer was,
and a computer program was, that there was some value in giving a user
a metaphor with something else on the real world. These days it is a
major problem because quite frequently the metaphor is lousier than
what we could write if we focused on _how efficiently can we do what
we want to do_ rather than _what is something, anything, that somebody
is likely to have done before which is sort of like what we want to do_.
My favourite example is the desktop metaphor. Now neat people can
have the experience of a messed up and cluttered desk. You too can
lose important work and documents because you can't find them!
Laura
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
2001-07-12 8:42 [9fans] architectures forsyth
2001-07-12 13:56 ` Laura Creighton
@ 2001-07-12 16:13 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-07-12 16:33 ` Matt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Ozan Yigit @ 2001-07-12 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk writes:
> contrary to Tog's advice on this point: with care i suspect
> you can make abstractions simple and effective enough without insisting on
> drawing a tenuous likeness to something in the `real world'.
An interesting related bit of work is "The Anti-Mac Interface" by Don
Gentner and Jakob Nielson, Communications of the ACM, 29(8), pp. 70-82
August 1996, but also found online. i wish we could have more of this kind
of de/re-construction; attempting to break all the interface design rules
and see what comes out. the results of this particular attempt are more
along the lines of raisin-bran cereal than waldorf salad but thought
provoking nevertheless.
oz
--
www.cs.yorku.ca/~oz | if you couldn't find any weirdness, maybe
york u. computer science | we'll just have to make some! -- hobbes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
2001-07-12 16:13 ` Ozan Yigit
@ 2001-07-12 16:33 ` Matt
2001-07-12 18:12 ` Scott Schwartz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-07-12 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> An interesting related bit of work is "The Anti-Mac Interface" by Don
> Gentner and Jakob Nielson, Communications of the ACM, 29(8), pp. 70-82
> August 1996, but also found online.
http://www.acm.org/cacm/AUG96/antimac.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
2001-07-12 16:33 ` Matt
@ 2001-07-12 18:12 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-12 18:16 ` Martin Harriss
2001-07-12 18:43 ` Dan Cross
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2001-07-12 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> http://www.acm.org/cacm/AUG96/antimac.htm
``...in designing Sun's home page we decided we needed to change it drastically
every month to keep the users' interest...''
No wonder it's so totally impossible to find anything in there! That one
statement makes me doubt every other thing they said. Sun's web site
has to be the worst I've ever used, especially taking into account
the obviously huge amount of effort that goes into it. It's clearly
all about entertaining suits, and not at all about making information
available to users who don't want to waste their time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
2001-07-12 18:12 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2001-07-12 18:16 ` Martin Harriss
2001-07-12 18:43 ` Dan Cross
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Martin Harriss @ 2001-07-12 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Scott Schwartz wrote:
>
> > http://www.acm.org/cacm/AUG96/antimac.htm
>
> ``...in designing Sun's home page we decided we needed to change it drastically
> every month to keep the users' interest...''
>
> No wonder it's so totally impossible to find anything in there! That one
> statement makes me doubt every other thing they said. Sun's web site
> has to be the worst I've ever used, especially taking into account
> the obviously huge amount of effort that goes into it. It's clearly
> all about entertaining suits, and not at all about making information
> available to users who don't want to waste their time.
It's also one of the slowest web sites around. I hate to think of the
amount of time that I've had to wait wating for their pages to load.
They used to *boast* that their web services were provided by a pair of
Ultra 1's. Looks like they still are.
</gripe>
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] architectures
2001-07-12 18:12 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-12 18:16 ` Martin Harriss
@ 2001-07-12 18:43 ` Dan Cross
2001-07-13 14:52 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-07-12 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In article <20010712181225.17835.qmail@g.bio.cse.psu.edu> you write:
>``...in designing Sun's home page we decided we needed to change it drastically
>every month to keep the users' interest...''
Hmm, I predict that Sun will be the DEC of the 2000's; they'll stick
to an obsolete and overburdened product line until it's too late, and
then get bought out by Dell and ultimately squashed under foot.
- Dan ``I saw a Solarian Light'' C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-18 23:57 rob pike
2001-07-19 0:03 ` Boyd Roberts
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2001-07-18 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I believe - if you think my opinion is relevant about a program I wrote
15 years ago but haven't used much for the last 7 or 8 - that sam has
two major advantages:
1) Structural regular expressions, and the command language that
derives from them.
2) Sam -r
Advantage 1) feels cool and makes a difference when you're working
on a problem; advantage 2) is the deep, structural improvement that
trumps all else.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 23:57 [9fans] sam vs acme rob pike
@ 2001-07-19 0:03 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 3:20 ` Rick Hohensee
2001-07-20 21:19 ` Mike Haertel
2 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-19 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
sam is a fine piece of s/w. accept no substitute.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 23:57 [9fans] sam vs acme rob pike
2001-07-19 0:03 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-19 3:20 ` Rick Hohensee
2001-07-20 21:19 ` Mike Haertel
2 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Rick Hohensee @ 2001-07-19 3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>
> I believe - if you think my opinion is relevant about a program I wrote
> 15 years ago but haven't used much for the last 7 or 8 - that sam has
> two major advantages:
>
> 1) Structural regular expressions, and the command language that
> derives from them.
> 2) Sam -r
>
> Advantage 1) feels cool and makes a difference when you're working
> on a problem; advantage 2) is the deep, structural improvement that
> trumps all else.
>
> -rob
>
Illiterate translation: it escapes the infuriating line-wiseness of the
ed-family text utils. Hoo Ray. Huzzah.
Quibble:
It doesn't quite fully supplant ed for me, unfortunately. It doesn't work
(that I know of) on binary files. It elides zero-bytes. My dotted-dir
thing for Linux directory names is dependant on an ed script that converts
e.g. /bin/ to /.bi/, that I can run on _anything_ uncompressed. I have sam
(just the command language part) in my base install stuff though , which
is under 40 meg, in addition to ed. Please take that as high praise.
Rick Hohensee
www.clienux.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-18 23:57 [9fans] sam vs acme rob pike
2001-07-19 0:03 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 3:20 ` Rick Hohensee
@ 2001-07-20 21:19 ` Mike Haertel
2001-07-20 22:37 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-23 8:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Mike Haertel @ 2001-07-20 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
A few days ago, Rob wrote:
>I believe - if you think my opinion is relevant about a program I wrote
>15 years ago but haven't used much for the last 7 or 8 - that sam has
>two major advantages:
>
>1) Structural regular expressions, and the command language that
> derives from them.
>2) Sam -r
>
>Advantage 1) feels cool and makes a difference when you're working
>on a problem; advantage 2) is the deep, structural improvement that
>trumps all else.
I won't dispute (1), but claim (2) gnawing at me ever since I saw it.
I personally use sam in preference to, say, vi, but I want to
play devil's advocate for a moment...
How is "sam -r" be different from running vi (or another tty based
editor of your choice) in a telnet session in a terminal emulator?
(Leaving aside the obvious differences: mouse-based vs. keyboard
based, different command language, sam's support for multiple
buffers.) Why is "sam -r" a "deep, structural improvement"?
* Both approaches take advantage of pre-existing remote execution
facilities.
* Both approaches avoid having to send entire file contents
over a possibly low-bandwidth link.
* Both approaches have a low-bandwidth protocol for updating
the remote display.
But:
* Many different display engines (terminal emulators) have been
written that are compatible with vi, so when you move to a new
system chances are there will be one already. By contrast, porting
samterm is nontrivial.
* On the other hand, you can easily port the sam back end to
just about any environment, since unlike a vi port you don't
have to worry about tty modes, curses libraries, and other
strange system dependent stuff. In fact the sam back end could
probably be written as a strictly conforming ANSI C program
with no OS-specific code at all.
So, there are differences, but there also seem to be advantages
on both sides. What makes "sam -r" so compelling? Or is
"sam -r" just a hack to regain functionality that was lost
in the move away from cursor-addressed character terminals?
Does this mean that every interactive display program that
does large amounts of file I/O but has low information theoretic
bandwidth to the display (e.g. editors, spreadsheets, just
about anything but pictures in fact) should be written in a
split-process style similarly to sam? Isn't that a pretty
big burden for programmers? Isn't there some way to solve this
problem *once* and reuse the solution?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-20 21:19 ` Mike Haertel
@ 2001-07-20 22:37 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-23 8:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-20 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Mike Haertel" <mike@ducky.net>
> I personally use sam in preference to, say, vi, but I want to
> play devil's advocate for a moment...
devil's idiot.
> How is "sam -r" be different from running vi (or another tty based
> editor of your choice) in a telnet session in a terminal emulator?
the user interface stays the same, but the editor runs remotely.
this all falls out of the way stuff was implemneted on the blit.
yes, we [basser] had a bunch of them and we were using 'jim'.
sam -r fell out of that rather fortuitously; as long as the
editor back end runs on the target m/c you could use sam
anywhere.
i'm not sure, but i suspect it was the beginning/inspiration
of 9P.
big difference.
you cannot compare that 'goto fonfon' disaster to sam.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-20 21:19 ` Mike Haertel
2001-07-20 22:37 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2001-07-23 8:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2001-07-23 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Mike Haertel wrote:
> ... What makes "sam -r" so compelling? ...
Because it works really slick with a very limited capability remote
host. I used it that way with a pseudo-Blit connected over dialup
to a minicomputer to edit large collections of files hosted on a
supercomputer. It beat all other available methods of editing
those files under those conditions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-19 6:14 forsyth
2001-07-19 13:30 ` Theo Honohan
2001-07-19 14:45 ` Dan Cross
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-07-19 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>>yer base level sysadmin in france. that was a bit of a shock. sysadmin
>>pays real well, but it's just as boring for an ex-code cutter as being
>>a bodyguard is for an ex-legionaire.
i noticed in the Shrek credits that sys admins appear to have replaced
key grip and best boy. there were quite a few sys admins.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-19 6:14 forsyth
@ 2001-07-19 13:30 ` Theo Honohan
2001-07-19 22:18 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 14:45 ` Dan Cross
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Theo Honohan @ 2001-07-19 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Thursday 19 July, forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk wrote ("Re: [9fans] sam vs acme "):
>
> >>yer base level sysadmin in france. that was a bit of a shock. sysadmin
> >>pays real well, but it's just as boring for an ex-code cutter as being
> >>a bodyguard is for an ex-legionaire.
>
> i noticed in the Shrek credits that sys admins appear to have replaced
> key grip and best boy. there were quite a few sys admins.
For extra software-schadenfreude points[1], see Shrek in the DLP Digital
presentation. The version I saw (Warner Village, Leicester Square) had
ugly flickering noise in areas of fine detail (e.g. wolf's fur),
presumably avoidable aliasing artifacts due to sloppy format conversion
at some stage. Ouch.
[1] We're all collecting these, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-19 13:30 ` Theo Honohan
@ 2001-07-19 22:18 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-07-19 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: "Theo Honohan" <theo@ideaworks3d.com>
>
> For extra software-schadenfreude points[1], see Shrek in the DLP Digital
> presentation. The version I saw (Warner Village, Leicester Square) ...
and you paid 10 quid for the _priviledge_. that's like 130 FF -- buy
the dvd. anyway with UGC here you can buy an _infinite_ movie card
for 108 FF/month [~7 quid] and see any movie at any time as many times
as you like as long as you sign up for a year.
you can book the ticket on the net and roll up and swipe your card.
no ugly queuing.
http://www.ugc.fr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-19 6:14 forsyth
2001-07-19 13:30 ` Theo Honohan
@ 2001-07-19 14:45 ` Dan Cross
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2001-07-19 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
In article <20010719061912.6DB8B199E8@mail.cse.psu.edu> you write:
>i noticed in the Shrek credits that sys admins appear to have replaced
>key grip and best boy. there were quite a few sys admins.
You know, I never have been able to figure out what a `key grip' or a
`best boy' *is*. Perhaps non-computer people can't figure out what a
sys admin is. Sometimes I wonder myself.
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-20 21:55 rob pike
2001-07-23 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2001-07-20 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> How is "sam -r" be different from running vi (or another tty based
> editor of your choice) in a telnet session in a terminal emulator?
Local echo and mouse-handling make a difference on slow and,
especially, high-latency networks.
> Does this mean that every interactive display program that
> does large amounts of file I/O but has low information theoretic
> bandwidth to the display (e.g. editors, spreadsheets, just
> about anything but pictures in fact) should be written in a
> split-process style similarly to sam? Isn't that a pretty
> big burden for programmers? Isn't there some way to solve this
> problem *once* and reuse the solution?
Yes, yes, and wouldn't it be nice?
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-20 21:55 rob pike
@ 2001-07-23 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-24 22:13 ` paurea
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Douglas A. Gwyn @ 2001-07-23 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
rob pike wrote:
> Yes, yes, and wouldn't it be nice?
if we were older
Then we wouldn't have to wait so long
And wouldn't it be nice to live together
In the kind of world where we belong
....
Maybe if we think and wish and hope and pray it might come true
Baby then there wouldn't be a single thing we couldn't do
....
You know it seems the more we talk about it
It only makes it worse to live without it
But let's talk about it
Wouldn't it be nice
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
2001-07-23 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
@ 2001-07-24 22:13 ` paurea
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: paurea @ 2001-07-24 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Douglas A. Gwyn writes:
> From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
> Subject: Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:54:33 GMT
>
> rob pike wrote:
> > Yes, yes, and wouldn't it be nice?
>
> if we were older
> Then we wouldn't have to wait so long
> And wouldn't it be nice to live together
> In the kind of world where we belong
>
> ....
>
> Maybe if we think and wish and hope and pray it might come true
> Baby then there wouldn't be a single thing we couldn't do
>
> ....
>
> You know it seems the more we talk about it
> It only makes it worse to live without it
> But let's talk about it
> Wouldn't it be nice
I was tempted, but restrained my fingers :-).
--
Saludos,
Gorka
"Curiosity sKilled the cat"
--
/"\
\ / ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
X - against ms attachments
/ \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] sam vs acme
@ 2001-07-20 22:41 forsyth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-07-20 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
>>Does this mean that every interactive display program that
>>does large amounts of file I/O but has low information theoretic
>>bandwidth to the display (e.g. editors, spreadsheets, just
>>about anything but pictures in fact) should be written in a
>>split-process style similarly to sam? Isn't that a pretty
>>big burden for programmers? Isn't there some way to solve this
>>problem *once* and reuse the solution?
yes. consider exporting a computable name space.
i've found it often reduces the burden on the programmer,
offers natural places to split the task, and like interconnection
with pipelines in unix, allows unusual combinations not expected
initially.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9
@ 2001-10-25 17:55 Russ Cox
2001-10-25 18:29 ` William Josephson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2001-10-25 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Could you please recommend me a reading on both architectures to
understand differences between them. I read here that BSD paging has
some drawbacks to AT&T one (used in Plan9). And I want to make this
clear for myself.
The discussions here were talking about many-years-old
systems. I don't think anyone even mentioned Plan 9's VM system,
which is just about the simplest thing you could imagine.
The BSDs have oodles more ``features.'' I'd look in
www.researchindex.com for the latest stuff, and in McKusick et al.
(Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD OS) for older stuff.
You can decide for yourself whether Plan 9 needs any of it.
Russ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9
2001-10-25 17:55 [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9 Russ Cox
@ 2001-10-25 18:29 ` William Josephson
2001-10-26 8:09 ` [9fans] acme bug/annoyance? Matt
2001-10-29 10:16 ` [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9 John S. Dyson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: William Josephson @ 2001-10-25 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 01:55:25PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> The discussions here were talking about many-years-old
> systems. I don't think anyone even mentioned Plan 9's VM system,
> which is just about the simplest thing you could imagine.
> The BSDs have oodles more ``features.'' I'd look in
> www.researchindex.com for the latest stuff, and in McKusick et al.
> (Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD OS) for older stuff.
> You can decide for yourself whether Plan 9 needs any of it.
You probably want to take a look at Charles Cranor's PHd thesis from
Washington on UVM. If I recall correctly, some of the *BSDs (NetBSD,
FreeBSD?) have picked it up or at least borrowed ideas.
-WJ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] acme bug/annoyance?
2001-10-25 18:29 ` William Josephson
@ 2001-10-26 8:09 ` Matt
2001-10-26 11:36 ` rob pike
2001-10-29 10:16 ` [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9 John S. Dyson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt @ 2001-10-26 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hi,
I just started a new instance of Acme
typed some code in an empty yellow window which was a directory
listing of an empty directory, I'd put the filename in the titlebar
but not saved the file.
All was going well until I resized the column and lost all my typing.
Not the end of the world but not very user friendly either.
An instance of where DWIM would win over "you have to have the text in
a file already, stupid"
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] acme bug/annoyance?
2001-10-26 8:09 ` [9fans] acme bug/annoyance? Matt
@ 2001-10-26 11:36 ` rob pike
2001-10-26 14:43 ` Scott Schwartz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: rob pike @ 2001-10-26 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
A nasty problem here. When you resize a directory window, acme should recolumnate
the output, but I couldn't see how to get that right while keeping the user's text, so I
just started over. A directory window is therefore a kind of scratch typing space, which
is actually a feature I like but is clearly a consequence of, rather than integral to, the design.
I suppose the documentation should mention this.
-rob
----- Original Message -----
From: Matt <matt@proweb.co.uk>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:09 AM
Subject: [9fans] acme bug/annoyance?
> Hi,
>
> I just started a new instance of Acme
>
> typed some code in an empty yellow window which was a directory
> listing of an empty directory, I'd put the filename in the titlebar
> but not saved the file.
>
> All was going well until I resized the column and lost all my typing.
>
> Not the end of the world but not very user friendly either.
>
> An instance of where DWIM would win over "you have to have the text in
> a file already, stupid"
>
> Matt
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9
2001-10-25 18:29 ` William Josephson
2001-10-26 8:09 ` [9fans] acme bug/annoyance? Matt
@ 2001-10-29 10:16 ` John S. Dyson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: John S. Dyson @ 2001-10-29 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
wkj-despam@eecs.harvard.edu (William Josephson) wrote in message news:<20011025142927.B8085@honk.eecs.harvard.edu>...
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 01:55:25PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> > The discussions here were talking about many-years-old
> > systems. I don't think anyone even mentioned Plan 9's VM system,
> > which is just about the simplest thing you could imagine.
> > The BSDs have oodles more ``features.'' I'd look in
> > www.researchindex.com for the latest stuff, and in McKusick et al.
> > (Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD OS) for older stuff.
> > You can decide for yourself whether Plan 9 needs any of it.
>
> You probably want to take a look at Charles Cranor's PHd thesis from
> Washington on UVM. If I recall correctly, some of the *BSDs (NetBSD,
> FreeBSD?) have picked it up or at least borrowed ideas.
>
FreeBSD and NetBSD have different VM systems. FreeBSD's (which I
am the primary implementer), is really a corrected and filled out
MACH VM for UNIX. It provides lots of the necessary shortcuts
fully virtualized for the process VM forking and things like that.
The original MACH VM port really wasn't meant as being production
ready (per my discussions with Hibler), but was more of a feasibility
exercise. Even though it wasn't fully made robust in the original
implementations, it wasn't that much worse than many commercial UNIX
VM behaviors.
Probably the biggest difference doesn't occur during 'normal'
memory resident situations, but where FreeBSD has rather advanced
paging stats, and really does put off the thrashfest until the
system doesn't have enough pages to supply an adequate resident
working set. If there is minimally enough memory, FreeBSD will
converge reasonably quickly, without undue thrashing. In my early
experiments, it was very satisfying to hear the system 'calm down'
after experiencing thrashing due to a necessary change in working
set population. Most other systems tended to keep on thrashing
for long periods, even when there was obviously enough memory. The
pseudo-random pagouts and invalidations from non-FreeBSD systems
tended to really screw up the page reference information on memory
segments being used by otherwise runnable processes. The relatively
good behavior has been especially useful when running user-mode
windowing systems, where the blocking from poorly chosen page
invalidations can really stop-up the works.
Both FreeBSD's VM and NetBSD's VM work pretty well (no real complaints
from either party), and most/all of the limitations of the original
MACH VM have been expunged. There were even cases of limitations
that I thought to be unsolvable in the FreeBSD code eventually simply
be an 'exercise in data structures', and the last REAL limitation
due to address space/fork inheritance was remedied as a result of
competition from NetBSD's new VM stuff.
FreeBSDs and NetBSDs code is both adequately portable, and that
should not be a deciding issue. Frankly, the most important deciding
issue is probably based upon knowledge of the VM code that the
individual who might do the port to Plan 9. One might make a
'decision' that the VM shouldn't page anyway (except in odd situations),
and so the relative advantages of the two systems becomes less
important.
My philosophy is based upon the fact that an OS MUST NOT just be a fair
weather friend, and from my rather VM-centered viewpoint, I believe that
this includes the fact that VM shouldn't randomly thrash, when it could
more actively converge to a reasonable working set (when possible.)
If starting from scratch, it is really easy to write some code that
works. However, there is ALOT more work to making a VM system
function under load to maximize availability of CPU cycles. Unfortunately,
it is clear that VM system behavior is almost always a secondary
priority, because it doesn't specify/benchmark very easily.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
@ 2002-01-20 20:02 Roshan James
2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Roshan James @ 2002-01-20 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3665 bytes --]
Getting started in Plan9
-------------------------
Its been a little over a week since i got my Plan9 working and
I still seem to be in tourist mode.Lots of questions and
a few suggestions:
(I promise I have tried to answer these for myself before
before I am ask them)
It would be great if we have a school boy style step-by-step
getting-off-the-ground tour of plan9, maybe somewhere in the
wiki. I would be glad to do this, if i knew enough.
Graphics
-----------
- I am working with an S3 Trio 64v2 card, the install floppy
gave me 800*600 res,but after installation i am on 640*480 and
i cant seem to be able to change it
aux/vga -l 800x600x8
gives me
'Warning (BUG) : redefinition of aperture does not change
s3screen segment.'
in a black background in the sentre of the screen and an error
message that reads
'aux/vga: vgactlw: <size 800x600x8 m8>: vga already configured'
in the console window. it is a low end card but I believe that
I did have a higher res through the boot disk so it should be
possible here too. how can i change to a higher res ?
- If plan9 is booted through xosl in 640*480 res,plan9 graphics
display ends up corrupt. the bootloader does switch to text mode
before the OS is booted. anyother resolution or a text mode boot
loader does not seem to have a problem.
The right quarter of the screen (approx) seems to be a duplicate
of the band of the screen display between in the left part. (bad
description i know). Anyway to fix this ?
Acessibility
-------------
- How can I read a couple of html docs in Plan9 ?
- Is there a place where the uses of directories the std file system
heirarchy is discussed, esp /n ?
- /n/c: exists, how can i access the extended partitions ?
- How can i access the floppy a: ? /n/a: exists but shows no files.
- How can i access the extended windows partitions ?
- Problem with accessing C: File operations to /n/c: causes a problem
'%mkdir /n/c:/testdir'
'mkdir: cant create /n/c:/testdir: write to hungup channel'
also a black background error message comes (is there a generic name
for these messages ?)
'dossrv 45: suicide: sys: trap fault read addr=0xb pc=0x00004757'
help ?
Shell
------
- How can I find/search for a file in Plan9 ? the usual find /|grep xxx
does not exist here, what is the equivalent ?
- Why doesnt/Can rc have autocomplete and filename completion as in
bash ? This has become so neccessary.
Keys
-----
- Why cant the left/right arrow keys+home+end keys move the cursor,
it is really difficult to edit something by placing the cursor there
with the mouse.
- Unless is it part of a grander plan (no pun intended), can we move
the process interrupt key from Del to something else and have the
conventional functionality of del back ?
General
-------
- Is the option of plan9 default boot in bootsetup (during install)
safe for other OSes that exist on the system ?
- Why arent there more applications and more developers interested
in developing for plan9 ?
Russ, I think it would kill you to keep answering all the newbie
questions. Russ, Imel, Thanks for all the help you have been. I
think the Plan9 faq needs updation with some of the more generic
questions here. This is a lesson that could learned from the Win32's,
if you want the OS to grow, you have to get people comfortable with
it very fast. I think we can make that happen.
Rosh.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
(Lord of the Rings)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4834 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 20:02 [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help Roshan James
@ 2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
2002-01-20 22:02 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-01-21 10:22 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-01-20 21:03 ` William S.
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: Matt H @ 2002-01-20 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Hi,
here's my set of slightly flippant answers
> - How can I read a couple of html docs in Plan9 ?
install inferno and use the netscape 3 hybrid Charon
I bet you can't wait :)
Web browsing it's plan9's end user pitfall.
No browser, not even text only (unless you count downloading & stripping the html tags text only)
> - How can I find/search for a file in Plan9 ? the usual find /|grep xxx
> does not exist here, what is the equivalent ?
du I think is your best bet
it's better still to learn where everything is :)
luckily there aren't 5 different directories where programs hide (well there can be but...)
all the executables show themselves in /bin which is a union of the directories where executables live if you see what I mean. There's aren't that many, have a look through them all, you'll remember easily enough.
> - Why doesnt/Can rc have autocomplete and filename completion as in
> bash ? This has become so neccessary.
yes, well, you see plan9 is more mouse driven. eventually you'll probably end up with Acme as much your "shell" as anything, and you'll find auto complete is unneccessary.
But you're right, it is a nice feature of the bash shell but then there are soooo many goddam directories on a Linux/FreeBSD box and auto complete is Bash's way of trying to alleviate the pain. If you miss it too much I'm sure you could just write a shell script to monitor /dev/cons for tabs, and echo the stuff into /dev/cons.
Personally, I do prefer having the screen as free form is plan9's is. The shell is more than the commands you can type, it's where you can type them.
> - Why cant the left/right arrow keys+home+end keys move the cursor,
> it is really difficult to edit something by placing the cursor there
> with the mouse.
That's what I said and I still get the urge to say it out loud. They told me I'd get used to it and you know what, I haven't. I'd even settle for Ctrl-J. But when I'm sat at a different terminal I still end up saying "I wish I was using Acme".
> - Unless is it part of a grander plan (no pun intended), can we move
> the process interrupt key from Del to something else and have the
> conventional functionality of del back ?
It depends who's conventions.
> - Why arent there more applications and more developers interested
> in developing for plan9 ?
file name completion
> This is a lesson that could learned from the Win32's,
> if you want the OS to grow, you have to get people comfortable with
> it very fast. I think we can make that.
After ten years of Windows I'm not sure people are comfortable with it.
It's clunky, crashes without explanation, brittle to end user fiddling, repeatedly exposes remote root exploits, is expensive, closed source. I need not go on.
> One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
> One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
> (Lord of the Rings)
Arntcha sick of those mobiles phones yet?
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
@ 2002-01-20 22:02 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-01-22 9:54 ` ozan s yigit
2002-01-21 10:22 ` Boyd Roberts
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2002-01-20 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
| yes, well, you see plan9 is more mouse driven. eventually you'll
| probably end up with Acme as much your "shell" as anything, and you'll
| find auto complete is unneccessary.
I think that input prediction, if done well, is a beautiful feature, and
one that would fit very well with acme, or maybe as a kind of plumbing. I
used to use a unix thing called "rk"; a markov chain style thing that
continuously prompted you with a line or two of predicted input. You
used the arrow keys or tab or ctrl-m to accept the next char/word/line
of the prediction. It was uncannily good. A lot of command line stuff is
very repetative, and anyone who's seen Rob's fake usenet postings can
see how good this kind of thing is for email. One of these days I'll
get around to hacking it into acme, maybe.
| > - Unless is it part of a grander plan (no pun intended), can we move
| > the process interrupt key from Del to something else and have the
| > conventional functionality of del back ?
Especially since PC keyboards have an actual "break" key to use.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 22:02 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2002-01-22 9:54 ` ozan s yigit
2002-01-23 10:05 ` Bakul Shah
0 siblings, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: ozan s yigit @ 2002-01-22 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) writes:
> used to use a unix thing called "rk"; a markov chain style thing that
> continuously prompted you with a line or two of predicted input.
it is "reactive keyboard" and i believe was a thesis work at university
of calgary, by Darragh under Witten. i'm sure a web search would still turn
up pointers. there is a book about it, not sure if still in print. the
interface was interesting in trying to accomodate disabled people to
interact with command interfaces by predictive completion.
oz
--
www.cs.yorku.ca/~oz | if you couldn't find any weirdness, maybe
york u. computer science | we'll just have to make some! -- hobbes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
2002-01-20 22:02 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2002-01-21 10:22 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-01-21 10:40 ` John Murdie
1 sibling, 1 reply; 230+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2002-01-21 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Matt H wrote:
> > - Why doesnt/Can rc have autocomplete and filename completion as in
> > bash ? This has become so neccessary.
> yes, well, you see plan9 is more mouse driven. eventually you'll probably end up with Acme as much your "shell" as anything, and you'll find auto complete is unneccessary.
> But you're right, it is a nice feature of the bash shell but then there are soooo many goddam directories on a Linux/FreeBSD box and auto complete is Bash's way of trying to alleviate the pain. If you miss it too much I'm sure you could just write a shell script to monitor /dev/cons for tabs, and echo the stuff into /dev/cons.
> Personally, I do prefer having the screen as free form is plan9's is. The shell is more than the commands you can type, it's where you can type them.
I remember the major flamewar over whether Byron's unix implementation of rc
should do this; I was in the 'no way' camp. The result was that you could
conditionally compile in that readline trash. You could probably pick it out
and stick into Plan 9's rc if you wanted to, but Plan 9 is not unix. It has
much better ways to do things.
I guess another way to do it is to use pipefile. One of the Kenji's (iirc)
did this for japanese input -- now there's a problem for you.
As for Latin-1: "Fco. J. Ballesteros" <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es> has volunteered
to clean up what I did late last year (I'm too busy). If anyone wants it I'll
send it on or put it on a web page somewhere. I think the only problem is the
caps-lock/ctrl key swap.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-21 10:22 ` Boyd Roberts
@ 2002-01-21 10:40 ` John Murdie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: John Murdie @ 2002-01-21 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans; +Cc: John Murdie
> - Why doesnt/Can rc have autocomplete and filename completion as in
> bash ? This has become so neccessary.
If you put the command history editor in the shell, then you can only
use it in the shell; if you use another shell from time to time, then
you have to learn to use that shell's (different) history mechanism.
It's far better to use a single, general, command history mechanism
provided by your terminal emulator or Acme (which is so more than a
terminal emulator). There is a slight loss from the shell and the
command history editor being separated, I know.
Incidentally, I hate command completion predictors; they remember my
typing mistakes days, weeks or months later, either hesitating to show
me the full, correct, command because of my previous mistake or, worse,
confidently complete my command with the mistake!
--
John A. Murdie
Experimental Officer (Software)
Department of Computer Science
University of York
England
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 20:02 [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help Roshan James
2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
@ 2002-01-20 21:03 ` William S.
2002-01-20 21:34 ` William Josephson
2002-01-21 6:53 ` cej
3 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: William S. @ 2002-01-20 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I can answer this one:
step one: (at the prompt type) a:
step two: cd /n/a:
Bill
Amsterdam, NL
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 01:32:35AM +0530, Roshan James wrote:
<<snip>>
>
> - How can i access the floppy a: ? /n/a: exists but shows no files.
<<snip>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 20:02 [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help Roshan James
2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
2002-01-20 21:03 ` William S.
@ 2002-01-20 21:34 ` William Josephson
2002-01-21 6:53 ` cej
3 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: William Josephson @ 2002-01-20 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 01:32:35AM +0530, Roshan James wrote:
> - Why doesnt/Can rc have autocomplete and filename completion as in
> bash ? This has become so neccessary.
binding everything on to /bin mostly remove the need for this.
If you haven't done so already, I would suggest grabbing the
various shell scripts and C programs from Russ Cox's web
page at www.eecs.harvard.edu/~rsc. " and "" are very useful
in conjunction with the mouse.
-WJ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
2002-01-20 20:02 [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help Roshan James
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-01-20 21:34 ` William Josephson
@ 2002-01-21 6:53 ` cej
3 siblings, 0 replies; 230+ messages in thread
From: cej @ 2002-01-21 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Rosh,
you can find some stupid scripts, including "find", at
http://cejchan.gli.cas.cz/plan9
Cheers,
--pac
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 230+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-29 2:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 230+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-08-18 15:34 [9fans] Re: Solaris thread scheaduling rob pike
[not found] ` <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2000-08-02 14:48 ` [9fans] pipefile rob pike
2000-08-02 15:49 ` James A. Robinson
2000-08-18 20:25 ` [9fans] Re: Solaris thread scheaduling Tom Duff
2000-09-06 21:59 ` [9fans] Reliable Cray Y-MP C90 Supercomputer rob pike
2000-09-06 22:02 ` James A. Robinson
2000-09-06 22:14 ` Boyd Roberts
2000-09-06 22:11 ` Boyd Roberts
2000-09-07 22:18 ` [9fans] new versions of graphics programs? Tom Duff
2000-11-01 22:23 ` [9fans] /n/smtp rob pike
2000-11-01 22:38 ` Scott Schwartz
2000-11-24 0:41 ` [9fans] Crazy idea... or a new project? rob pike
2000-11-24 0:48 ` Boyd Roberts
2000-11-24 22:13 ` Scott Schwartz
2000-11-24 22:24 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-02-06 17:11 ` [9fans] azerty [french] keyboard support rob pike
2001-02-06 19:10 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-02-06 19:23 ` Dan Cross
2001-02-07 15:23 ` [9fans] 9p2k, fsync rob pike
2001-02-07 18:42 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-02-08 1:19 ` Dan Cross
2001-02-08 9:43 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-02-14 13:51 ` [9fans] isatty rob pike
2001-02-14 16:42 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-03-26 14:12 ` [9fans] sam mod for delete-forward rob pike
2001-03-26 15:37 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-03-27 8:25 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-03-27 14:01 ` Sam
2001-03-27 16:51 ` Dan Cross
2001-03-28 8:37 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-03-29 8:26 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-03-26 15:42 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-05-10 14:59 ` [9fans] snprint(), getfields() specification rob pike
2001-05-10 16:42 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-05-10 18:13 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-05-10 21:38 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-11 6:51 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-05-19 14:14 ` Re[4]: [9fans] home, end ^h^j^k^l rob pike
2001-05-19 14:26 ` Re[6]: " Matt H
2001-05-19 22:45 ` [9fans] ls -m Scott Schwartz
2001-05-19 22:50 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-19 15:35 ` Re[4]: [9fans] home, end ^h^j^k^l James A. Robinson
2001-05-19 20:36 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-19 23:30 ` Richard Elberger
2001-05-20 2:37 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-20 7:03 ` Lucio De Re
2001-05-20 11:16 ` paurea
2001-05-20 13:11 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-20 13:04 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-23 8:24 ` Randolph Fritz
2001-05-23 8:46 ` Re[6]: " Matt H
2001-05-23 9:04 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-20 0:16 ` [9fans] ls -m rob pike
2001-05-20 0:31 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-20 1:38 ` [9fans] mouse vs key Scott Schwartz
2001-05-20 6:29 ` Dan Cross
2001-05-20 8:09 ` Matt H
2001-05-20 11:35 ` Re[2]: [9fans] mouse vs key - nethack matt
2001-05-20 13:13 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-05-20 12:50 ` [9fans] mouse vs key Boyd Roberts
2001-05-29 4:27 ` [9fans] src vs db rob pike
2001-05-29 4:37 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-11 19:22 ` [9fans] sam vs acme rob pike
2001-07-11 20:08 ` James A. Robinson
2001-08-14 12:54 ` [9fans] User Interface rob pike
2001-08-14 15:01 ` James A. Robinson
2001-08-16 13:45 ` phaet0n
2001-08-20 8:57 ` Randolph Fritz
2001-12-02 3:10 ` [9fans] plumb rob pike
2001-12-02 3:31 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-01-30 5:52 ` [9fans] venti rob pike
2002-01-30 6:23 ` George Michaelson
2002-01-30 8:07 ` paurea
2002-01-30 11:17 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-03-01 6:20 ` Fwd: Re: [9fans] samuel (fwd) rob pike
2002-03-01 6:34 ` George Michaelson
2002-03-01 12:04 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-04-27 16:35 ` [9fans] Fourth Release of Plan 9 Now Available rob pike, esq.
2002-04-27 18:24 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-04-27 22:14 ` Laura Creighton
2002-04-29 9:37 ` Andrew
2002-06-28 16:49 ` [9fans] dumb question rob pike, esq.
2002-06-29 2:23 ` Scott Schwartz
2000-09-07 21:57 [9fans] new versions of graphics programs? rob pike
2000-09-07 22:50 ` Jim Choate
[not found] ` <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
2000-09-07 22:35 ` Tom Duff
2000-09-07 23:24 ` Jim Choate
2000-09-08 15:28 ` please_no_spam_to_
[not found] ` <D.M.Pick@qmw.ac.uk>
2000-09-08 16:43 ` Tom Duff
2001-06-09 17:22 [9fans] could those of you who have students check this out for forsyth
2001-06-09 18:50 ` [9fans] Re: the 'science' in computer science andrey mirtchovski
2001-06-09 17:56 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-11 8:27 ` pac
2001-06-11 15:19 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-11 21:43 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] ` <0cb501c0f2bf$97cacea0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
2001-06-11 22:43 ` paurea
2001-06-12 14:18 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-12 15:50 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 18:48 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-12 0:09 ` Scott Merrilees
2001-06-12 0:16 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 0:42 ` Scott Merrilees
2001-06-12 1:08 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] ` <0cc301c0f2c0$78949560$e8b7c6d4@SOMA>
2001-06-12 14:12 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-16 23:34 ` Matt
2001-06-28 21:29 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-28 22:03 ` Matt
2001-06-28 23:20 ` George Michaelson
2001-06-29 21:27 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 15:49 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-06-29 4:30 ` Lucio De Re
[not found] <vikki@proweb.co.uk>
2001-06-10 17:32 ` [9fans] string to list? vikki
2001-06-10 17:47 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-10 17:55 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-10 18:03 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-10 21:48 ` Matt
2001-06-10 22:24 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-10 22:30 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] <matt@proweb.co.uk>
2001-06-12 0:39 ` [9fans] help, i'm in a wet paper bag and I can't get out Matt
2001-06-12 0:55 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-12 1:12 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 1:00 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-12 1:30 ` Jonathan Sergent
2001-06-15 8:27 ` Hermann Samso
2001-06-15 11:53 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-15 12:18 ` Matt
2001-06-15 14:01 ` Matt
2001-06-15 14:25 ` Boyd Roberts
[not found] <aam396@mail.usask.ca>
2001-06-24 23:04 ` [9fans] sam vs acme andrey mirtchovski
2001-06-24 22:14 ` Matt
2001-06-24 22:33 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-06-25 3:41 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-28 22:58 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-25 0:28 anothy
2001-07-10 9:00 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-06-25 1:08 jmk
2001-06-25 7:10 nigel
2001-06-25 7:25 ` Matt
2001-06-28 23:04 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-25 7:45 Richard Miller
2001-06-25 13:29 William Staniewicz
2001-06-25 23:59 rob pike
2001-06-26 0:14 ` Howard Trickey
2001-06-26 4:55 anothy
2001-06-26 16:33 [9fans] bitsy question John Packer
2001-06-26 17:10 ` [9fans] " Dan Cross
2001-06-26 19:51 ` John Packer
2001-06-26 20:34 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-29 22:32 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-06-27 1:15 ` [9fans] Two cpu servers? Ish Rattan
2001-06-26 20:09 ` [9fans] Re: bitsy question John Packer
2001-06-26 20:36 ` Dan Cross
2001-06-26 20:18 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2001-06-26 20:28 ` Matt
2001-06-26 22:13 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-06-28 23:52 [9fans] sam vs acme David Gordon Hogan
2001-06-29 21:28 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-10 10:32 rog
2001-07-10 10:43 ` Lucio De Re
2001-07-18 8:43 ` David Rubin
2001-07-18 21:17 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 21:40 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-18 21:51 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 22:55 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-18 23:00 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-19 0:00 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 0:12 ` suspect
2001-07-19 0:14 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-20 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-20 9:47 ` George Michaelson
2001-07-20 10:08 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-20 16:44 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-07-20 21:57 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-10 22:57 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-10 23:23 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 6:55 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-11 13:24 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 21:20 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-12 10:36 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-12 8:31 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-07-12 10:38 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 6:52 nemo
[not found] <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2001-07-11 17:53 ` David Gordon Hogan
2001-07-11 19:19 ` James A. Robinson
2001-07-11 21:15 ` Steve Kilbane
2001-07-11 23:11 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-11 20:16 rob pike
2001-07-11 20:36 rog
2001-07-11 20:36 rob pike
2001-07-11 21:09 ` Dan Cross
2001-07-11 21:01 rog
2001-07-12 8:42 [9fans] architectures forsyth
2001-07-12 13:56 ` Laura Creighton
2001-07-12 16:13 ` Ozan Yigit
2001-07-12 16:33 ` Matt
2001-07-12 18:12 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-07-12 18:16 ` Martin Harriss
2001-07-12 18:43 ` Dan Cross
2001-07-13 14:52 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-13 15:13 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-18 23:57 [9fans] sam vs acme rob pike
2001-07-19 0:03 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 3:20 ` Rick Hohensee
2001-07-20 21:19 ` Mike Haertel
2001-07-20 22:37 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-23 8:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-19 6:14 forsyth
2001-07-19 13:30 ` Theo Honohan
2001-07-19 22:18 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-07-19 14:45 ` Dan Cross
2001-07-20 21:55 rob pike
2001-07-23 8:54 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-07-24 22:13 ` paurea
2001-07-20 22:41 forsyth
2001-10-25 17:55 [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9 Russ Cox
2001-10-25 18:29 ` William Josephson
2001-10-26 8:09 ` [9fans] acme bug/annoyance? Matt
2001-10-26 11:36 ` rob pike
2001-10-26 14:43 ` Scott Schwartz
2001-10-29 10:16 ` [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9 John S. Dyson
2002-01-20 20:02 [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help Roshan James
2002-01-20 21:01 ` Matt H
2002-01-20 22:02 ` Scott Schwartz
2002-01-22 9:54 ` ozan s yigit
2002-01-23 10:05 ` Bakul Shah
2002-01-21 10:22 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-01-21 10:40 ` John Murdie
2002-01-20 21:03 ` William S.
2002-01-20 21:34 ` William Josephson
2002-01-21 6:53 ` cej
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).